skip to main content
10.1145/1090785.1090810acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Research-derived web design guidelines for older people

Published:09 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the development of a set of research-derived ageing-centred Web design guidelines. An initial set of guidelines was first developed through an extensive review of the HCI and ageing literature and through employing a series of classification methods (card sorting and affinity diagrams) were employed as a means for obtaining a revised and more robust set of guidelines. A group of older Web users were then involved in evaluating the usefulness of the guidelines. To provide evaluation context for these users, two websites targeted to older people were used. This study makes several contributions to the field. First, it is perhaps the first manuscript that proposes ageing-friendly guidelines that are for most part backed by published studies. Second, the guidelines proposed in this study have been thoroughly examined through a series of expert and user verifications, which should give users of these guidelines confidence of their validity.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p129-kurniawan56k.mp4

mp4

21 MB

p129-kurniawan768k.mp4

mp4

145.4 MB

References

  1. Christopher, P. Older Adults - Special considerations for special people, 1999. Available at: http://www.gsu.edu/ ~mstswh/courses/it7000/papers/newpage31.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaffney, G. What is Affinity Diagramming?, 1999. Available at: http://www.infodesign.com.au/ftp/ AffinityDiagramming.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. General Services Administration. Section 508, 1998. Available at: http://www.section508.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hart, T. Evaluation of Websites for Older Adults: How "Senior Friendly" are they? Available at: http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/61/older_adults.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hom, J. The Usability Methods Toolbox Handbook, 1998. Available at: http://jthom.best.vwh.net/usability/ usable.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hwang F., Keates S., Langdon P., Clarkson P.J., Robinson P, 2001. Perception and haptics: Towards more accessible computers for motion-impaired users, in Proceedings of Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces (PUI'001) (Orlando, USA, Nov 2001). Available at: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/conferences/PUI/PUIWorkshop/PUI-2001/a26.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. IBM. EZSort. Available at: http://www-3.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/410Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolodinsky, J., Cranwell M., Rowe, E. Bridging the Generation Gap across the Digital Divide: Teens Teaching Internet Skills to Senior Citizens. Journal of Extension 40, 3, 2002. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2002june/rb2.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lopes, J.B. Designing user interfaces for severely handicapped persons. Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on Universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly, (Alcácer do Sal, Portugal, May 2001). ACM Press, 100--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Maguire, M.C. User-Centred Requirements Handbook, Version 3.3, 1998. Available at: http://www.ejeisa.com/nectar/respect/5.3/44.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Maurer, D., Warfel, T. Card sorting: a definitive guide. Available at: http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/ card_sorting_a_definitive_guide.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Meyer, B., Sit, R.A., Spaulding, V.A., Mead, S.E., Walker, N. Age Group Differences in World Wide Web Navigation, in Extended Abstracts of the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '97) (Atlanta, GA, USA, March 1997), ACM Press, New York, NY, 1997, 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Meyer, B., Mead, S.E., Rogers, W.A., Schneider-Hufschmidt, M. Making technology accessible for older users, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '98) (Los Angeles, CA, USA, April 1998), ACM Press, New York, NY, 1998, 373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. National Institute on Aging. Making Your Web Site Senior Friendly: A Checklist, 2002. Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen, J. Ten Usability Heuristics, 1994. Available at: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robertson, J. Information design using card sorting. Available at: http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Scapin, D., Leulier, C., Vanderdonckt, J., Mariage, C., Bastien, C., Farence, C., Palanque, P., Bastide, R. A Framework for Organising Web Usability Guidelines. Available at: http://www.tri.sbc.com/hfweb/scapin/Scapin.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zajicek, M. Successful and available: interface design exemplars for older users. Interacting with Computers 16, 2004, 411--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0., 1999. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W3C. Policies Relating to Web Accessibility, 2003. Available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research-derived web design guidelines for older people

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Assets '05: Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
      October 2005
      232 pages
      ISBN:1595931597
      DOI:10.1145/1090785

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 October 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader