Correction to: Ophthalmol Ther https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3
In Fig. 4 of this article, the 95%LoA are not properly visualized for three studies (Muijzer 2021, VA ≤ 0.5 logMAR; Rosser 13 2001 [ETDRS] and Lim 2010 [ETDRS]); the figure should have appeared as shown below.
Mean differences between distance visual acuity assessments (digital tool minus reference standard) and 95% limits of agreement in logMAR. Some articles reported separate comparisons per subgroup or per eye. The dashed lines represent ± 0.15 logMAR, a difference that has been suggested in literature to be clinically acceptable [20]. Abbreviations: N number of paired observations; 95% LoA 95% limits of agreement
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Claessens, J.L.J., Geuvers, J.R., Imhof, S.M. et al. Correction to: Digital Tools for the Self-Assessment of Visual Acuity: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther 10, 731–732 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00376-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00376-9