Importance of an Interprofessional Team Approach in Achieving Improved Management of the Dizzy Patient

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

Because of its multifaceted nature, dizziness is difficult for clinicians to diagnose and manage independently. Current treatment trends suggest that patients are often referred to the otolaryngologist for intervention despite having a nonotologic disorder. Additionally, many individuals with atypical presentations are often misdiagnosed and spend a significant amount of time waiting for consultation by the otolaryngologist. Few studies have alluded that implementation of an interprofessional team approach in the diagnosis and management of the dizzy patient can improve clinical decision-making. However, to the authors’ knowledge, there is no information specifically quantifying the outcomes and potential benefits of using an interprofessional balance care team approach.

Purpose:

To compare dizziness diagnoses trends and referral practices with and without the use of an interprofessional management approach within a university healthcare system.

Research Design:

Over the course of a 3-yr period, a retrospective review of the diagnosis and management of dizziness was performed with and without implementation of an interprofessional team. To observe potential differences, year 3 incorporated the interprofessional management approach while years 1–2 did not. The two periods were then compared to each other.

Study Sample:

A total of 134 patients referred to a university hearing clinic for a vestibular and balance function evaluation.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Diagnoses and management trends were examined with descriptive statistics (percentages and frequencies). Fisher’s exact tests, analysis of contingency tables, were conducted to evaluate the influence of interprofessional management on dizziness diagnoses and treatment patterns.

Results:

Results demonstrated that before implementation of an interprofessional team approach, (1) referring clinicians used unspecific dizziness diagnosis codes (e.g., dizziness and giddiness), (2) a low number of patients with dizziness were referred for balance function testing, (3) diagnoses remained unspecific following the balance function assessment, and (4) the most frequently occurring vestibular diagnoses were unilateral vestibular hypofunction and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Following the use of an interprofessional management approach, it was determined that (1) disease-specific diagnoses increased, (2) patients with dizziness were referred for balance function testing mainly by otolaryngologists, (3) dizziness was considered to be multifaceted for a greater number of patients, (4) a larger percentage of patients were referred to a specialist other than the otolaryngologist as a result of their diagnosis, and (5) patients reported reduction or resolution of their symptoms.

Conclusions:

An interprofessional management approach for the dizzy patient can lead to more specific diagnoses and provide alternative referral pathways to other health-care professionals (e.g., audiologists, physical therapists, and pharmacists) in an effort to reduce over-referral to one specialist. Future studies should address the utility of an interprofessional team approach in the overall management of patients with dizziness.

This article was orally presented at the Texas Society of Allied Health Professions Conference, Houston, TX, September 24 and 25, 2014; the Texas Speech, Language, and Hearing Difference Convention, San Antonio, TX, March 19–21, 2015.

• REFERENCES

• Agrawal Y, Ward BK, Minor LB. 2013; Vestibular dysfunction: prevalence, impact and need for targeted treatment. J Vestib Res 23 (03) 113-117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (AAA) 2004 Scope of practice. http://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/scope-practice . Accessed 10 August 2015
• Bird JC, Beynon GJ, Prevost AT, Baguley DM. 1998; An analysis of referral patterns for dizziness in the primary care setting. Br J Gen Pract 48 (437) 1828-1832
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowman S. 2008; Why ICD-10 is worth the trouble. J AHIMA 79 (03) 24-29, quiz 41–42
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burkard R, Trembath S. 2015 Practicing at the top of the audiology license. ASHA Access Audiology, 20. http://www.asha.org/aud/Articles/practicing-at-the-top-of-the-audiology-license/ . Accessed 15 August 2015
  Google Scholar
• Cappello M, di Blasi U, di Piazza L, Ducato G, Ferrara A, Franco S, Fornaciari M, Sciortino A, Tarantino AM, di Blasi S. 1995; Dizziness and vertigo in a department of emergency medicine. Eur J Emerg Med 2 (04) 201-211
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colledge NR, Barr-Hamilton RM, Lewis SJ, Sellar RJ, Wilson JA. 1996; Evaluation of investigations to diagnose the cause of dizziness in elderly people: a community based controlled study. BMJ 313 (7060) 788-792
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dros J, Maarsingh OR, Beem L, van der Horst H, ter Riet G, Schellevis F, van Weert H. 2012; Functional prognosis of dizziness in older adults in primary care: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 60 (12) 2263-2269
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dros J, Maarsingh OR, van der Horst HE, Bindels PJ, Ter Riet G, van Weert HC. 2010; Tests used to evaluate dizziness in primary care. CMAJ 182 (13) E621-E631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fife D, FitzGerald JE. 2005; Do patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo receive prompt treatment? Analysis of waiting times and human and financial costs associated with current practice. Int J Audiol 44 (01) 50-57
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geser R, Straumann D. 2012; Referral and final diagnoses of patients assessed in an academic vertigo center. Front Neurol 3: 169
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guardabascio LM, Rothman RE, Zee DS, Newman-Toker DE. 2006; “Chief complaint screening”—a new method for symptom-oriented research in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 13: S146
  Google Scholar
• Han BI, Song HS, Kim JS. 2011; Vestibular rehabilitation therapy: review of indications, mechanisms, and key exercises. J Clin Neurol 7 (04) 184-196
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herdman SJ, Whitney SL. 2007. Interventions for the patient with vestibular hypofunction. In: Herdman SJ. Vestibular Rehabilitation. San Francisco, CA: Davis Company; 309-337
  Google Scholar
• Herr RD, Zun L, Mathews JJ. 1989; A directed approach to the dizzy patient. Ann Emerg Med 18 (06) 664-672
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman RM, Einstadter D, Kroenke K. 1999; Evaluating dizziness. Am J Med 107 (05) 468-478
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honaker JA, Gilbert JM, Stabb JP. 2009; Chronic subjective dizziness (CSD) vs. conversion disorder: discussion of clinical findings and rehabilitation. Am J Audiol 19: 3-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayarajan V, Rajenderkumar D. 2003; A survey of dizziness management in General Practice. J Laryngol Otol 117 (08) 599-604
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Koch LL, Celani KE, Lopez IP, Williams VA. 2008; Hearing and balance screening and referrals for Medicare patients: a national survey of primary care physicians. J Am Acad Audiol 19 (02) 171-190
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maarsingh OR, Dros J, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC, van der Windt DA, ter Riet G, van der Horst HE. 2010; Causes of persistent dizziness in elderly patients in primary care. Ann Fam Med 8 (03) 196-205
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macias JD, Massingale S, Gerkin RD. 2005; Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation therapy in reducing falls. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133 (03) 323-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahalingam S, Seymour N, Pepper C, Tostevin P, Oakeshott P. 2014; Reducing inappropriate referrals to secondary care: our experiences with the ENT Emergency clinic. Qual Prim Care 22 (05) 251-255
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Post RE, Dickerson LM. 2010; Dizziness: a diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician 82 (04) 361-368, 369
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royl G, Ploner CJ, Leithner C. 2011; Dizziness in the emergency room: diagnoses and misdiagnoses. Eur Neurol 66 (05) 256-263
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saber Tehrani AS, Coughlan D, Hsieh YH, Mantokoudis G, Korley FK, Kerber KA, Frick KD, Newman-Toker DE. 2013; Rising annual costs of dizziness presentations to U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 20 (07) 689-696
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staab JP. 2012; Chronic subjective dizziness. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 18 (5 Neuro-otology) 1118-1141
  Google Scholar
• Stewart MG, Chen AY, Wyatt JR, Favrot S, Beinart S, Coker NJ, Jenkins HA. 1999; Cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic evaluation of vertigo. Laryngoscope 109 (04) 600-605
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wasay M, Dubey N, Bakshi R. 2005; Dizziness and yield of emergency head CT scan: is it cost effective?. [Letter] Emerg Med J 22 (04) 312
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein BE, Devons CA. 1995; The dizzy patient: stepwise workup of a common complaint. Geriatrics 50 (06) 42-46, 49, quiz 50–51
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yardley L, Donovan-Hall M, Smith HE, Walsh BM, Mullee M, Bronstein AM. 2004; Effectiveness of primary care-based vestibular rehabilitation for chronic dizziness. Ann Intern Med 141 (08) 598-605
  Google Scholar
• Zhao JG, Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel Jr EL, Kallogjeri D, Goebel JA. 2011; Predictive capability of historical data for diagnosis of dizziness. Otol Neurotol 32 (02) 284-290
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar