A Review of Numerical Simulation and Analytical Modeling for Medical Devices Safety in MRI

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To review past and present challenges and ongoing trends in numerical simulation for MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) safety evaluation of medical devices.

Methods: A wide literature review on numerical and analytical simulation on simple or complex medical devices in MRI electromagnetic fields shows the evolutions through time and a growing concern for MRI safety over the years. Major issues and achievements are described, as well as current trends and perspectives in this research field.

Results: Numerical simulation of medical devices is constantly evolving, supported by calculation methods now well-established. Implants with simple geometry can often be simulated in a computational human model, but one issue remaining today is the experimental validation of these human models. A great concern is to assess RF heating on implants too complex to be traditionally simulated, like pacemaker leads. Thus, ongoing researches focus on alternative hybrids methods, both numerical and experimental, with for example a transfer function method. For the static field and gradient fields, analytical models can be used for dimensioning simple implants shapes, but limited for complex geometries that cannot be studied with simplifying assumptions.

Conclusions: Numerical simulation is an essential tool for MRI safety testing of medical devices. The main issues remain the accuracy of simulations compared to real life and the studies of complex devices; but as the research field is constantly evolving, some promising ideas are now under investigation to take up the challenges.

• References

• 1 ©OECD/2015, OECD Data, OECD Publishing, Paris.. https://data.oecd.org.
  PubMed
• 2 ©OECD/2015, Hip and knee replacement, OECD Publishing, Paris.. DOI:10.1787/health_glance-2015-36-en.
  PubMed
• 3 ISO/TS 10974:2012, Assessment of the safety of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with an active implantable medical device.
  PubMed
• 4 ASTM F2052 - 15, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment.
  PubMed
• 5 Yee K. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media.. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1996; May 14 (Suppl. 05) 302-7.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ibrahim TS. Modeling the EM wave interaction with the Body and SAR.. ISMRM Weekend Educational Course Syllabus 2006.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Büchler P, Simon A, Burger J, Ginggen A, Crivelli R, Tardy Y. et al. Safety of Active Implantable Devices During MRI Examinations: A Finite Element Analysis of an Implantable Pump.. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007 April;54(4).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Xu XG, Eckerman KF. Handbook of Anatomical Models for Radiation Dosimetry.. Series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; 2009.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Xu XG, Chao TC, Bozkurt A. VIP-MAN: an image-based whole-body adult male model constructed from color photographs of the visible human project for multi-particle Monte Carlo calculations.. Health Physics 2000; May 78 (Suppl. 05) 476-86.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Caon M. Voxel-based computational models of real human anatomy: a review.. Radiat Environ Biophys 2004; Feb 42 (Suppl. 04) 229-35.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Consortium of Computational Human Phantoms (CCHP). 2011 http://www.virtualphantoms.org/phantoms.htm.
  PubMed
• 12 Kim CH, Jeong JH, Yeom YS. Recent Advances in Computational Human Phantom for Monte Carlo Dose Calculation.. Prog Nucl Sci Technol 2012; 3: 7-10.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Mispelter J, Lupu M, Briguet A. NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biomedical experiments.. Imperial College Press; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 14 ASTM F2182 - 11a, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating On or Near Passive Implants During Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
  PubMed
• 15 Chaudhury A, Khasnavis S, Russell M, Sarathy V. Magnetic Resonance Induced Heating in a Vascular Stent.. Cornell University Library; 2007
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rafiroiu D, Ciupa R, Iancu A, Lazar A, Tiseanu I. Numerical analysis of the electric field and temperature changes around carotid stents.. 7th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 SPEAG Website. (http://www.speag.com) Generic stent lead simulation with Huygens Source.
  PubMed
• 18 Pawlenka M, Schaefers G. MR Safety of Implants: Numerical assessment of SAR distribution at design-simplified stents of different lengths placed inside a virtual phantom model investigated at an MR frequency of 63.9 MHz.. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2009(17).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Busch M, Vollmann W, Bertsch T, Wetzler R, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B. et al. On the heating of inductively coupled resonators (stents) during MRI examination.. Magn Reson Med 2005; Oct 54 (Suppl. 04) 775-82.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Busch MH, Vollmann W, Schnorr J, Grönemeyer DH. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants with cylindrical symmetry: 1. Properly working devices.. Biomed Eng Online 2005; Apr 8 4: 25.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Camps-Raga B, Goertz W, Schaefers G, Mezape Y, Shalev A. A comparative study of numerical and experimental evaluation of RF-induced heating for an endovascular stent-graft at 1.5 T and 3T.. Biomed Tech 2012; 57 (Suppl. 1).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Camps-Raga B, Gortz W, Schaefers G, Mezape Y, Shalev A. Numerical and experimental evaluation of SAR hotspots for an endovascular stent graft at 1.5T and 3T.. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE) 2012
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Schaefers G, Goertz W, Noureddine Y, Koch C, Pawlenka MJ. Magnetic Resonance (MR) safety testing of implants using numerical simulation for worst-case determination.. General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, XXXth URSI 2011.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ibrahim TS, Tang L, Kangarlu A, Abraham R. Electromagnetic and Modeling Analyses of an implanted device at 3 and 7 T.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; Nov 26 (Suppl. 05) 1362-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Hand JW, McRobbie DW. Effects of hip prostheses in situ exposed to 64 and 128 MHz RF Field.. eMagRes 2012 1(3).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Powell J, Papadaki A, Hand J, Hart A, McRobbie D. Numerical simulation of SAR induced around Co-Cr-Mo hip prostheses in situ exposed to RF Fields associated with 1.5 and 3T MRI body coils.. Magn Reson Med 2012; Sep 68 (Suppl. 03) 960-8.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Liu Y, Chen J, Shellock F, Kainz W. Computational and experimental studies of orthopedic implants heating under MRI RF coils.. IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT) 2012
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Liu Y. Numerical and experimental study of MRI RF signal interactions with various medical devices.. PhD Dissertation, University of Houston Libraries 2012
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Liu Y, Chen J, Shellock FG, Kainz W. Computational and experimental studies of an orthopedic implant: MRI-related heating at 1.5T/64 MHz and 3T/128 MHz.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; Feb 37 (Suppl. 02) 491-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Angelone LM, Potthast A, Segonne F, Iwaki S, Belliveau JW, Bonmassar G. Metallic electrodes and leads in simultaneous EEG-MRI: Specific absorption rate (SAR) simulation studies.. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; May 25 (Suppl. 04) 285-95.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Shen J, Kainz W, Qian S, Wu W, Chen J. Computational study of external fixation devices surface heating in MRI RF environment.. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2012
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Nyenhuis JA, Miller CR. Calculation of Heating of Passive Implants by the RF Electromagnetic Field in MRI.. XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Kraff O, Wrede KH, Schoemberg T, Dammann P, Noureddine Y, Orzada S. et al. MR safety assessment of potential RF heating from cranial fixation plates at 7T.. Med Phys 2013; Apr 40 (Suppl. 04) 042302.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Jasti S, Singh V, Lazzi G. On the modeling of the electromagnetic fields induced by MRI fields in patients with a retinal implant.. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2007
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Marincas C, Mada M, Rotaru H, Carpenter A, Ciupa R. The thermal effect of Radiofrequency waves near dental implants during MRI examination at 3 Tesla.. Acta Electrotehnica 2013 54(1).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Giordano D, Zilberti L, Borsero M, Chiampi M, Bottauscio O. Experimental validation of MRI dosimetric simulations in phantoms including metallic objects.. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2014; 50 (Suppl. 11) 1-4.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Bottauscio O, Cassarà AM, Hand JW, Giordano D, Zilberti L, Borsero M. et al. Assessment of computational tools for MRI RF dosimetry by comparison with measurements on a laboratory phantom.. Phys Med Biol 2015; Jul 21 60 (Suppl. 14) 5655-80.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Andreuccetti D, Fossi R, Petrucci C. An Internet resource for the calculation of the dielectric properties of body tissues in the frequency range 10 Hz - 100 GHz.. Website at http://niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop.IFAC-CNR Florence (Italy), 1997. Based on data published by C. Gabriel et al. in 1996
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Hasgall PA, Di Gennaro F, Baumgartner C, Neufeld E, Gosselin MC, Payne D. et al. IT’IS Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues.. Version 3.0, 2015 Sept, www.itis.ethz.ch/database.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Murbach M. EMF Risk Assessment: Exposure Assessment and Safety Considerations in MRI and other Environments.. PhD Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Thesis No. 21514, Zurich, 2013.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Shrivastava D, Utecht L, Tian J, Hughes J, Vaughan JT. In Vivo Radiofrequency Heating in Swine in a 3T (123.2 MHz) Birdcage Whole Body Coil.. Magn Reson Med 2014; Oct 72 (Suppl. 04) 1141-50.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Gosselin MC, Neufeld E, Payne D, Kuster N. Numerical simulation in virtual anatomical models: the devil is in the details.. Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 2015.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Abbasi M, Schaefers G, Sánchez JD, Erni D. Worst-Case Analysis of RF-Induced Heating During MRI Scanning in a Generic Multi-Component Orthopedic Medical Implant Applying the Design of Experiment Method (DoE).. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2014;22.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Neufeld E, Oikonomidis IV, Iacono MI, Akinnagbe E, Angelone LM, Kainz W. et al. Simulation platform for coupled modeling of EM-induced neuronal dynamics and functionalized anatomical models.. 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), 2015.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Niendorf T, Paul K, Oezerdem C, Graessl A, Klix S, Huelnhagen T. et al. W(h)ither human cardiac and body magnetic resonance at ultrahigh fields?. Technical advances, practical considerations, applications, and clinical opportunities. NMR Biomed 2015 Feb 23.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Finn JP, Ennis DB. Pacemaker Lead Tip Heating in Abandoned and Pacemaker-Attached Leads at 1.5 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; Feb 33 (Suppl. 02) 426-31.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Bottomley PA, Kumar A, Edelstein WA, Allen JM, Karmarkar PV. Designing passive MRI-safe implantable conducting leads with electrodes.. Med Phys 2010; Jul 37 (Suppl. 07) 3828-43.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Yeung CJ, Susil RC, Atalar E. RF Safety of Wires in Interventional MRI:Using a Safety Index.. Magn Reson Med 2002; Jan 47 (Suppl. 01) 187-93.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Yeung CJ, Susil RC, Atalar E. RF Heating Due to Conductive Wires During MRI Depends on the Phase Distribution of the Transmit Field.. Magn Reson Med 2002; Dec 48 (Suppl. 06) 1096-8.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Park SM, Kamondetdacha R, Nyenhuis JA. Calculation of MRI-Induced Heating of an Implanted Medical Lead Wire With an Electric Field Transfer Function.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; Nov 26 (Suppl. 05) 1278-85.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Feng S, Qiang R, Kainz W, Chen J. A technique to evaluate MRI-induced Electric Fields at the ends of practical implanted lead.. IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 2015 Jan;63(1).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Cabot E, Zastrow E, Kuster N. Safety assessment of AIMDs under MRI Exposure: Tier3 vs.. Tier4 Evaluation of Local RF-induced Heating. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Tokyo (EMC’14/Tokyo), 2014.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Missoffe A, Kabil J, Felblinger J, Pasquier C, Vuissoz PA. Determination of a transmission line model of an insulated cable for RF interaction hazard evaluation.. ESMRMB Scientific Session communications, October 2015.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Balac S, Caloz G. Induced magnetic field computations using a boundary integral formulation.. Applied Numerical Mathematics 2002; 41: 345-67.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Lüdeke KM, Röschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging.. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3 (Suppl. 04) 329-43.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Balac S, Benoit-Cattin H, Lamotte T, Odet C. Analytic solution to boundary integral computation of susceptibility induced magnetic field inhomogeneities.. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2004; 39 4-5 437-55.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Olsson MB, Wirestam R, Persson BR. A computer simulation program for MR imaging: Application to RF and static magnetic field imperfections.. Magn Reson Med 1995; Oct 34 (Suppl. 04) 612-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Balac S, Caloz G. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2000; 3 (Suppl. 04) 335-49.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Balac S. Simulation numérique des artefacts de susceptibilité magnétique en IRM. Innovation et Technologie en Biologie et Médecine (ITBM) [Numerical simulation of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in MRI.. Innovation and Technology in Biology in Medicine (ITBM)] 1998; 19 (Suppl. 05) 369-79.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Condon B, Hadley DM. Potential MR hazard to patients with metallic heart valves: The Lenz effect.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; Jul 12 (Suppl. 01) 171-6.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Robertson NM, Diaz-Gomez M, Condon B. Estimation of torque on mechanical heart valves due to magnetic resonance imaging including an estimation of the significance of the Lenz effect using a computational model.. Phys Med Biol 2000; Dec 45 (Suppl. 12) 3793-807.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Golestanirad L, Dlala E, Wright G, Mosig JR, Graham SJ. Comprehensive analysis of Lenz effect on the artificial heart valves during magnetic resonance imaging.. Progress In Electromagnetics Research 2012; 128: 1-17.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Büchler P, Simon A, Burger J, Ginggen A, Crivelli R, Tardy Y, Luechinger R, Olsen S. Safety of Active Implantable Devices During MRI Examinations: A Finite Element Analysis of an Implantable Pump.. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007 April;54(4).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Turk EA, Kopanoglu E, Guney S, Bugdayci KE, Ider YZ, Erturk VB. et al. A Simple Analytical Expression for the Gradient Induced Potential on Active Implants During MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 October;59(10).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M, Hand J, Lopez HS, Crozier S. Collateral Thermal Effect of MRI-LINAC Gradient Coils on Metallic Hip Prostheses.. IEEE Transaction on Magnetics 2014 Nov;50(11).
  PubMedGoogle Scholar