CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Semin Hear 2024; 45(01): 029-039
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770138
Review Article

Rehabilitation Service Needs and Preferences among Veterans with Tinnitus: A Qualitative Study

Khaya D. Clark
1   VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR), Portland, Oregon
2   Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
3   Department of Defense, Hearing Center of Excellence, San Antonio, Texas
,
Tara Zaugg
1   VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR), Portland, Oregon
,
Susan DeFrancesco
4   VA Health Services Research & Development Service Center of Innovation, Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System (R&D 66), Portland, Oregon
5   Oregon Health and Science University – Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Christine Kaelin
1   VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR), Portland, Oregon
,
James A. Henry
1   VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR), Portland, Oregon
6   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Kathleen F. Carlson
1   VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR), Portland, Oregon
4   VA Health Services Research & Development Service Center of Innovation, Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System (R&D 66), Portland, Oregon
5   Oregon Health and Science University – Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
FUNDING/ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to the Veterans that shared their time and experiences with us as participants in this research. This research was supported by grants from the Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (SPiRE 121 RX002216-01 to K.F.C.; C9427S to J.A.H.; and C9230C to M.P.F.). This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR) (Center Award #C2361C/I50 RX002361) at the VA Portland Health Care System in Portland, Oregon. Support for this work was also received from the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute at Oregon Health and Science University (1 UL1 RR024140 01). The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.

Abstract

Tinnitus is prevalent among military Veterans, yet there is a gap between the demand and the provision of services for tinnitus rehabilitation services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We sought to understand tinnitus rehabilitation service needs and preferences among Veterans with bothersome tinnitus who use Veterans Affairs (VA) services. We conducted semistructured telephone interviews in 2019 with Veterans diagnosed with tinnitus, who reported it as bothersome. Veterans were purposively sampled to represent national VA users, with and without comorbid traumatic brain injury (TBI), and who were or were not interested in tinnitus rehabilitation services. Qualitative data were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Among 40 Veterans interviewed (32 men, 8 women; 50% with TBI), 72.5% endorsed being somewhat/very likely to be interested in tinnitus rehabilitation services while 27.5% were very/somewhat unlikely. Themes related to Veterans' interest in tinnitus rehabilitation services included barriers and facilitators to participation and preferences for receiving tinnitus services (e.g., individual vs. group-based; in-person vs. remote access). Our findings highlight factors that influence Veterans' reported need and preferences for, and readiness to engage in, rehabilitation services for tinnitus. Personalized or otherwise adaptable approaches to program delivery may help ensure maximal uptake among Veterans.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990; 8 (04) 221-254
  • 2 Folmer RL, McMillan GP, Austin DF, Henry JA. Audiometric thresholds and prevalence of tinnitus among male veterans in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48 (05) 503-516
  • 3 Bhatt JM, Bhattacharyya N, Lin HW. Relationships between tinnitus and the prevalence of anxiety and depression. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (02) 466-469
  • 4 Reavis KM, Henry JA, Marshall LM, Carlson KF. Prevalence of self-reported depression symptoms and perceived anxiety among community-dwelling US adults reporting tinnitus. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2020; 5 (04) 959-970
  • 5 Hoffman HJ. Epidemiology of tinnitus. Tinnitus Theory and Management; 2004: 16-41
  • 6 Theodoroff SM, Lewis MS, Folmer RL, Henry JA, Carlson KF. Hearing impairment and tinnitus: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in US service members and veterans deployed to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Epidemiol Rev 2015; 37 (01) 71-85
  • 7 Swan AA, Nelson JT, Swiger B. et al. Prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus in Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. Hear Res 2017; 349: 4-12
  • 8 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Mental health. Accessed March 2022 at: https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/get-help/treatment/ebt.asp
  • 9 Myers PJ, Griest S, Kaelin C. et al. Development of a progressive audiologic tinnitus management program for Veterans with tinnitus. J Rehabil Res Dev 2014; 51 (04) 609-622
  • 10 Henry JA, Thielman EJ, Zaugg TL. et al. Randomized controlled trial in clinical settings to evaluate effectiveness of coping skills education used with progressive tinnitus management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60 (05) 1378-1397
  • 11 Henry JA, Thielman EJ, Zaugg TL. et al. Telephone-based progressive tinnitus management for persons with and without traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (02) 227-242
  • 12 Carlson KF, Gilbert TA, O'Neil ME. et al. Health care utilization and mental health diagnoses among veterans with tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (1S): 181-190
  • 13 Zaugg TL, Thielman EJ, Carlson KF. et al. Factors affecting the implementation of evidence-based progressive tinnitus management in department of veterans affairs medical centers. PLoS One 2020; 15 (12) e0242007
  • 14 Carlson KF, Barnes JE, Hagel EM, Taylor BC, Cifu DX, Sayer NA. Sensitivity and specificity of traumatic brain injury diagnosis codes in United States Department of Veterans Affairs administrative data. Brain Inj 2013; 27 (06) 640-650
  • 15 Gilbert T, Holmer H, Carlson K. 0099 validity of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for traumatic brain injury in VA administrative data. Inj Prev 2021; 27 (Suppl. 03) A29
  • 16 Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Guidebook. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2018
  • 17 Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. Tinnitus Functional Index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res 2016; 334: 58-64
  • 18 Prewitt A, Harker G, Gilbert TA. et al. Mental health symptoms among veteran VA users by tinnitus severity: a population-based survey. Mil Med 2021; 186 (Suppl. 01) 167-175
  • 19 Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2013: 541-545
  • 20 Knudsen LV, Laplante-Lévesque A, Jones L. et al. Conducting qualitative research in audiology: a tutorial. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (02) 83-92
  • 21 Crabtree BF. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage; 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199507000-00011
  • 22 Scaglione T, Kuzbyt B. Tinnitus management: the utilization of a hybrid telehealth and in-person delivery model. Semin Hear 2021; 42 (02) 115-122
  • 23 de Matos IL, Ferreira MC, Mondelli MFCG. Development and evaluation of Portal do Zumbido: a novel telehealth approach to tinnitus. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 25 (02) e258-e266
  • 24 Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4 (01) 50
  • 25 Aazh H, Swanepoel W, Moore BCJ. Telehealth tinnitus therapy during the COVID-19 outbreak in the UK: uptake and related factors. Int J Audiol 2021; 60 (05) 322-327
  • 26 Andersson G. Tinnitus in 2021. Time to consider evidence-based digital interventions. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 12: 100263
  • 27 Beukes EW, Andersson G, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Baguley DM. Effectiveness of guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy vs face-to-face clinical care for treatment of tinnitus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144 (12) 1126-1133
  • 28 Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67 (12) 2072-2078
  • 29 Sykes S, Wills J, Rowlands G, Popple K. Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis. BMC Public Health 2013; 13 (01) 150
  • 30 Occa A, Morgan SE, Scaglione TL, Kuzbyt B, Bookman RJ. What would an evidence-based tinnitus patient education program look like? findings from a scoping review. J Commun Healthc 2020; 13 (03) 188-200
  • 31 Rozmovits L, Ziebland S. What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 53 (01) 57-64
  • 32 Mold JW, Blake GH, Becker LA. Goal-oriented medical care. Fam Med 1991; 23 (01) 46-51
  • 33 Clark KD, Garinis AC, Konrad-Martin D. Incorporating patient narratives to enhance audiological care and clinical research outcomes. Am J Audiol 2021; 30 (3S): 916-921
  • 34 Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T. et al. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med 2015; 45 (01) 11-27
  • 35 Hoge CW, Castro CA, Messer SC, McGurk D, Cotting DI, Koffman RL. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (01) 13-22
  • 36 Milliken CS, Auchterlonie JL, Hoge CW. Longitudinal assessment of mental health problems among active and reserve component soldiers returning from the Iraq war. JAMA 2007; 298 (18) 2141-2148
  • 37 Sayer NA, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Spoont M. et al. A qualitative study of determinants of PTSD treatment initiation in veterans. Psychiatry 2009; 72 (03) 238-255
  • 38 Porter TL, Johnson WB. Psychiatric stigma in the military. Mil Med 1994; 159 (09) 602-605
  • 39 Moldestad M, Stryczek KC, Haverhals L. et al. Competing demands: scheduling challenges in being veteran-centric in the setting of health system initiatives to improve access. Mil Med 2021; 186 (11-12): e1233-e1240