Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2016; 141(20): 1455-1458
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112089
Klinischer Fortschritt
Intensivmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sepsis – ein Update 2016

Sepsis: new findings and developments. Update 2016
Matthias Kochanek
1   Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln
,
Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen
1   Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln
,
Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
1   Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln
,
Boris Böll
1   Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 October 2016 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Inzidenz der Sepsis nimmt in Deutschland nach neuesten DRG Auswertungen weiter zu und auch die Letalität ist weiterhin auf hohem Niveau. Ziel der neuen Sepsis - 3 Definition ist das Erkennen und den Therapiebeginn zu optimieren. Die Therapie Algorithmen nach Rivers (EGDT) sind in die Jahre gekommen. Eine rasche Identifikation von septischen Patienten, schnelle Antibiotikagabe und rasches Therapiemanagement sind entscheidend.

Abstract

The incidence of sepsis increases in Germany from latest DRG evaluations and also the mortality is still at a high level. The aim of the new Sepsis - 3 definition is to optimize the identification and initiation of therapy. The treatment algorithms by Rivers (EGDT) are getting old. Rapid identification of septic patients, rapid administration of antibiotics and rapid therapy management are crucial.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Hall M. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief 2011; 62
  • 2 Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Shieh MS et al. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 754-761
  • 3 Fleischmann C, Thomas-Rueddel DO, Hartmann M et al. Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 159-166
  • 4 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801-810
  • 5 Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 775-787
  • 6 Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 762-774
  • 7 Bone. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP / SCCM consensus conference committee. American college of chest physicians / Society of critical care medicine. Chest 1992; 101: 1644
  • 8 Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC et al. 2001 SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS International sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1250-1256
  • 9 Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1629-1638
  • 10 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-1377
  • 11 Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1683-1693
  • 12 Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1301-1311
  • 13 Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1496-1506
  • 14 Gupta RG, Hartigan SM, Kashiouris MG et al. Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions. Crit Care 2015; 19: 286