Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148(4): 426-428
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249815
Hüftgelenkendoprothetik

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Harnblasenperforation durch Migration eines Burch-Schneider-Stützrings

Urinary Bladder Perforation Caused by a Loosened Acetabular Reinforcement RingD. Neumann1 , G. Metzner1 , F. Hofmann1 , U. Dorn1
  • 1Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg, Österreich
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 April 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Stützringe finden in der Revisionschirurgie großer azetabulärer Defekte breite Anwendung. Wir präsentieren einen Fallbericht eines gelockerten Burch-Schneider-Rings, kombiniert mit Perforation der Harnblase und konsekutiver Makrohämaturie 10 Jahre postoperativ. Nach entsprechender präoperativer Abklärung erfolgten die interdisziplinäre Explantation der Hüftendoprothese sowie die Sanierung des Defekts in der Harnblasenwand.

Abstract

Reinforcement cages are widely used for the treatment of large acetabular bone defects. We report the case of a loosened Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring causing a recurrent macrohaematuria due to a perforation of the urinary bladder. After performing several diagnostic procedures, the patient underwent interdisciplinary revision surgery. Due to the severe destruction of the acetabular bone stock and an infection of the total hip prosthesis as confirmed by fresh frozen section, the hip prosthesis was explanted. At the last follow-up the patient was free of infect-related symptoms and was able to walk with one crutch.

Schlüsselwörter

Harnblase - Perforation - Hüfte - Revision

Key words

urinary bladder - perforation - hip - revision

Literatur

  • 1 Paprosky W G, Perona P G, Lawrence J M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6 year follow-up evaluation.  J Arthroplasty. 1994;  9 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives followed for 0,3–13 years.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;  70 240-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gallo J, Florschutz A V. Burch Schneider cage fracture: a case report.  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005;  149 281-285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ilchmann T, Gelzer J P, Winter E. Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch Schneider ring: an EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions.  Acta Orthop. 2006;  77 79-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Van Koeveringe A J, Ochsner P E. Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.  Int Orthop. 2002;  26 291-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wachtl S W, Jung M, Jakob R P. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow up of 12 years.  J Arthroplasty. 2000;  15 959-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mittag F, Kluba T. Aneurysm of the femoral artery caused by aseptic loosening and migration of a Burch-Schneider cage.  J Arthroplasty. 2009;  24 159-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Daniel Neumann

Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg

Muellner Hauptstr. 48

5020 Salzburg

Österreich

Phone: + 43/6 62/44 82 29 01

Fax: + 43/6 62/44 82 29 03

Email: dr.daniel.neumann@gmail.com

      >