Minimally Invasive Cesarean Section – Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section. The Outcomes of Applying to the Same Patient More than Once. Case Series

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Extraperitoneal caesarean section (EPCS) provides intraoperative and postoperative advantages to patients compared to transperitoneal (TPCS). Nevertheless, it is less preferred.

Methods Extraperitoneal caesarean section (EPCS) is a type of caesarean section performed without entering the peritoneal cavity.

Results In this study, EPCS was successfully performed again in patients who had previously undergone EPCS.

Conclusion This method, which reduces maternal mortality and health expenditures, can be performed more than once.

Publication History

Received: 30 August 2023

Accepted after revision: 07 November 2023

Article published online:
14 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Bates GW, Shomento S. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: S19-24
  Google Scholar
• 2 Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP. et al. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction 2013; 28: 1943-1952
  Google Scholar
• 3 Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y. et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 853-865
  Google Scholar
• 4 Andolf E, Thorsell M, Kallen K. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 406e1-6
  Google Scholar
• 5 Hibbard LT. Extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985; 28: 711-721
  Google Scholar
• 6 Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P. et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 338.e1-8
  Google Scholar
• 7 Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, AI RA. Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 657-663
  Google Scholar
• 8 Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P. et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 338.e1-8
  Google Scholar
• 9 Khoiwal K, Sheoran D, Mishra R. et.al Comparison of extra-peritoneal cesarean section with conventional trans-peritoneal cesarean section: An open label randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023; 19: 100212
  Google Scholar
• 10 Vaswani BP, Trivedi A, Gopal S. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis. Int J Reprod Contracept. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 9: 567-569
  Google Scholar
• 11 Bebincy DS, Chitra J. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section in surgical morbidity in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6: 3397-3399
  Google Scholar
• 12 Chao Ji, Meng C, Eichen Q. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective study. Postgrad Med 2023; 135: 38-42
  Google Scholar
• 13 Shlomi S, Inna B, Rabia B. et al. Comparison between modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section to the standard cesarean technique – a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5: 100910
  Google Scholar
• 14 Dimassi K, Ami O, Fauck D. et al. French ambulatory cesarean: Mother and newborn safety. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 148: 198-204
  Google Scholar
• 15 Mukhopadhyay D, Gada R, Rufford B. Repeat extraperitoneal cesarean section on a woman with pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 37: 370-372
  Google Scholar