Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section after two Medial Laparotomies, Anus Prater, and Surgical Treatment of the Rectovaginal Fistula in a Patient with Crohn’s Disease: A Case Report

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this case report is to show the advantages of the extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) approach in a pregnant patient with multiple previous abdominal transperitoneal colon surgeries and Crohn’s disease. A pregnant nulliparous woman with Crohn’s disease was admitted for delivery. After delivery, a large rupture and lesion of the rectum was observed. Suturing of the vagina, rectum and sphincter was performed by an abdominal surgeon. Because of a very large and irregularly shaped rectum rupture, the patient underwent infraumbilical medial laparotomy and sigmoidostomy. After 18 months, the patient started to experience vaginal discharge and Y-shaped rectovaginal fistula was confirmed. Surgical reconstruction was performed. The patient’s second pregnancy began one year later. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, elective extraperitoneal cesarean section was performed. A healthy newborn was delivered. Follow-up showed full and fast recovery after the ECS. In cases of pregnant women who have had multiple colon surgeries, gynecology surgeons can choose to perform an ECS to avoid transperitoneal entrance into the abdomen. ECS avoids lysis of postoperative adhesions after repetitive gastrointestinal surgeries, the formation of new adhesions by lysis of the old adhesions, and most importantly, the possibility of colon or small intestine lesions during lysis of dense or firm adhesions.

Publication History

Received: 16 July 2023

Accepted: 10 October 2023

Article published online:
06 December 2023

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Perinat Med 2020; 49: 5-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ. et al. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 2012; 32: 1693-1712
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Chou CY, Liang PC, Chen CA. et al. Cervical abscess with vaginal fistula after extraperitoneal cesarean section. J Formos Med Assoc 2007; 106: 1048-1051
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P. et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obs Gyn 2013; 209: 338. e331-338
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Turan C, Buyukbayrak EE, Yilmaz AO. et al. Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section. J Obs Gyn Res 2015; 41: 565-574
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hatch Q, Champagne BJ, Maykel JA. et al. Crohn’s disease and pregnancy: the impact of perianal disease on delivery methods and complications. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 174-178
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Bourgeois GA, Phaneuf LE. The surgical anatomy of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Am J Obs Gyn 1949; 57: 237-250
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Ellis GJ, Devita MR. Extraperitoneal cesarean section. A simplified technique. Am J Obs Gyn 1961; 82: 695-701
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Norton JF. A paravesical extraperitoneal cesarean section technique; with an analysis of 160 paravesical extraperitoneal cesarean sections. Am J Obs Gyn 1946; 51: 519-526
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cacciarelli RA. Extraperitoneal cesarean section; a new paravesical approach. Am J Surg 1949; 78: 371-373
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Olivier AMF, Bénédicte S, Richard B. et al. The French ambulatory cesarean section: technique and interest. Int J Gynecol Clin Pract 2017; 4: 1-6
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Mukhopadhyay D, Gada R, Rufford B. Repeat extraperitoneal cesarean section on a woman with pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Obs Gyn 2017; 37: 370-372
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Perkins RP. Role of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obs Gyn 1980; 23: 583-599
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ. et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013; 347: f5588
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Awonuga AO, Fletcher NM, Saed GM. et al. Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review. Reprod Sci 2011; 18: 1166-1185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sinopoulou V, Gordon M, Akobeng AK. et al. Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn’s disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11: CD013531
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ouaissi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N. et al. Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg 2012; 149: e104-e114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 PAPooSE Study Group. Pregnancy outcomes after stoma surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: The results of a retrospective multicentre audit. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24: 838-844
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar