Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000043.xml
NOTARZT 2022; 38(03): 123-124
DOI: 10.1055/a-1690-3162
DOI: 10.1055/a-1690-3162
Journal Club
Mobile Stroke Units verbessern das Outcome von Schlaganfallpatienten
Je schneller ein Schlaganfall behandelt wird, desto höher ist die Chance auf ein behinderungsfreies Überleben [1] [2]. Mit einer mobilen Stroke Unit (MSU) kann die Therapie prähospital begonnen werden [3]. Die BEST-MSU-Studie in den USA und die B_PROUD-Studie in Berlin haben nun gezeigt, dass das MSU-Konzept zu einem verbesserten klinischen Outcome führt.
Publication History
Article published online:
23 March 2023
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Saver JL. et al. Stroke thrombolysis: save a minute, save a day. Stroke 2014; 45: 1053-1058 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002910. (PMID: 24627114)
- 2 Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Tatlisumak T. et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke: Save a minute-save a week. Neurology 2017; 88: 2123-2127 DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003981. (PMID: 28455382)
- 3 Fassbender K, Walter S, Liu Y. et al. “Mobile stroke unit” for hyperacute stroke treatment. Stroke 2003; 34: e44 DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075573.22885.3B. (PMID: 12750527)
- 4 Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M. STEMO Consortium. et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1622-1631 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-020-00100-1. (PMID: 33499926)
- 5 Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 397-404 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70057-1. (PMID: 22497929)
- 6 Ebinger M, Kunz A, Wendt M. et al. Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72: 25-30 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3188. (PMID: 25402214)
- 7 Kunz A, Ebinger M, Geisler F. et al. Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 1035-1043
- 8 Zwaab J, Knies S, van der Meijden C, Staal P, van der Heiden L. Cost-effectiveness in practice. 2016 Im Internet (Stand: 05.11.2021): https://english.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publications/reports/2015/06/16/cost-effectiveness-in-practice
- 9 Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Weinstein MC. Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 796-797
- 10 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. 2021 Im Internet (Stand: 05.11.2021): https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/resources/
- 11 Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen KR, Bollweg K. et al. Cost-effectiveness estimate of prehospital thrombolysis: results of the PHANTOM-S study. Neurology 2015; 84: 1090-1097 DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001366. (PMID: 25672925)