Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis with Dexamethasone Phonophoresis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intraarticular corticosteroid injection is an adjunct to core treatments for relief of moderate-to-severe pain in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the effect of dexamethasone phonophoresis (DxPh) on knee OA.

Patients and Methods

Forty six female patients with knee OA were randomized into two equal groups. The study group received DxPh over the medial side of the knee, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and quadriceps strengthening exercises. Control group received ultrasound therapy and the same TENS and exercise program. Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the pain subscale of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pre- and posttreatment. Functional mobility was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, total WOMAC, and the joint stiffness and physical function subscales of WOMAC. The minimal clinically identifiable difference was used to calculate treatment effect sizes of both modalities, which was compared to intraarticular steroid injections.

Results

The VAS, TUG, and WOMAC scores improved with both modalities. Pain intensity improved by 50.6%–58.0% in the study group (VAS and pain subscale of WOMAC, respectively) compared to 17.8%–28.6% for the control group. Functional mobility showed a higher rate of improvement in the DxPh group compared to control (37.7 vs. 17.5% for TUG and 53.2 vs. 23.0 and 56.1 vs. 26.4% for the joint stiffness and physical function subscales of WOMAC, respectively). Posttreatment results revealed statistically and clinically significant improvement in pain intensity and functional mobility in the DxPh group.

Conclusion

DxPh resulted in a greater improvement in pain and function in patients with knee OA than therapeutic ultrasound combined with exercise and TENS. The effect size of phonophoresis was clinically significant and higher than that reported for intraarticular steroid injection from pooled data in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scanzello CR, Goldring SR. The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Bone 2012;51:249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2011;7:33–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jevsevar DS, Brown GA, Jones DL, Matzkin EG, Manner PA, Mooar P, et al. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on: Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, 2nd edition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1885–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott J, Checketts JX, Horn JG, Cooper C, Vassar M. “Knee osteoarthritis and current research for evidence-are we on the right way?” Int Orthop 2018;42:2105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutenbrunner C, Bender T, Cantista P, Karagülle Z. A proposal for a worldwide definition of health resort medicine, balneology, medical hydrology and climatology. Int J Biometeorol 2010;54:495–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Release 2011;152:330–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Grant RL, Guideline Development Group. Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008;336:502–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ostergaard M, Halberg P. Intraarticular corticosteroids in arthritic disease: A guide to treatment. BioDrugs 1998;9:95–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Creamer P. Intraarticular corticosteroid treatment in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1999;11:417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jevsevar DS, Shores PB, Mullen K, Schulte DM, Brown GA, Cummins DS. Mixed treatment comparisons for nonsurgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A Network meta-analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018;26:325–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakhtiary AH, Fatemi E, Emami M, Malek M. Phonophoresis of dexamethasone sodium phosphate may manage pain and symptoms of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin J Pain 2013;29:348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elshazly FA, Shimaa A, Azab R, Lotfy Radwan N, Salah W, Mahmoud ED. Effect of phonophoresis on selected gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Am Sci 2013;99:679–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akinbo SR, Aiyejusunle CB, Akinyemi OA, Adesegun SA, Danesi MA. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of phonophoresis and iontophoresis using dexamethasone sodium phosphate in the management of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007;14:190–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altman RD. Classification of disease: Osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991;20:40–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Altman RD. Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987;65:31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:1886–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Butler AA, Menant JC, Tiedemann AC, Lord SR. Age and gender differences in seven tests of functional mobility. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pietrosimone BG, Saliba SA, Hart JM, Hertel J, Kerrigan DC, Ingersoll CD. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and therapeutic exercise on quadriceps activation in people with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:4–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide. Version VII. Brisbane, Australia; 2005; quoted in: Bellamy, N. The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand Osteoarthritis Indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:S148–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up and go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luksurapan W, Boonhong J. Effects of phonophoresis of piroxicam and ultrasound on symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim BW, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Sharma L, Bennell KL. Does knee malalignment mediate the effects of quadriceps strengthening on knee adduction moment, pain, and function in medial knee osteoarthritis? A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:943–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Day ML, McGuigan MR, Brice G, Foster C. Monitoring exercise intensity during resistance training using the session RPE scale. J Strength Cond Res 2004;18:353–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Atamaz FC, Durmaz B, Baydar M, Demircioglu OY, Iyiyapici A, Kuran B, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential currents, and shortwave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:748–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klaiman MD, Shrader JA, Danoff JV, Hicks JE, Pesce WJ, Ferland J. Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:1349–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Darrow H, Schulthies S, Draper D, Ricard M, Measom GJ. Serum dexamethasone levels after decadron phonophoresis. J Athl Train 1999;34:338–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Boucaud A, Montharu J, Machet L, Arbeille B, Machet MC, Patat F, et al. Clinical, histologic, and electron microscopy study of skin exposed to low-frequency ultrasound. Anat Rec 2001;264:114–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Benson HA. Transdermal drug delivery: Penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv 2005;2:23–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeğin T, Altan L, Kasapoğlu Aksoy M. The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017;43:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. White D, Evans JA, Truscott JG, Chivers RA. Can ultrasound propagate in the joint space of a human knee? Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:1104–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:142–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roos EM, Arden NK. Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016;12:92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saraf SK, Singh OP. Management of chronic hemophilic synovitis in children by phonophoresis. Indian J Orthop 2005;39:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Penderghest CE, Kimura IF, Gulick DT. Double-blind clinical efficacy study of pulsed phonophoresis on perceived pain associated with symptomatic tendinitis. J Sport Rehabil 1998;7:9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saliba S, Mistry DJ, Perrin DH, Gieck J, Weltman A. Phonophoresis and the absorption of dexamethasone in the presence of an occlusive dressing. J Athl Train 2007;42:349–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gurney AB, Wascher D, Schenck R, Tennison A, Jaramillo B. Absorption of hydrocortisone acetate in human connective tissue using phonophoresis. Sports Health 2011;3:346–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sedghimehr T, Bahrpeima F. Comparison of the effects of topical hydrocortison and clobetasole phonophoresis on reduction of pain in osteoarthritic knee joint. Physiol Pharmacol 2006;10:247–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emad Samuel Boles Saweeres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, M.A.S., Saweeres, E.S.B., Abdelkader, N.A. et al. Improved Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis with Dexamethasone Phonophoresis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JOIO 53, 700–707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_639_18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_639_18

Keywords

Navigation