Abstract
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remains a major problem in perinatal medicine because of the variety of its underlying causes and the prediction of its outcome. Characteristics of heartbeat interval patterns are associated with neuro-vegetative and humoral regulatory processes. Fetal magnetocardiography allows non-invasive assessment of these processes with high precision throughout the second half of gestation. The aim of our study was the analysis of linear and non-linear parameters of fetal heart rate fluctuations to distinguish between IUGR fetuses and a cohort of normal subjects, both pre-selected from heart-rate traces representing a quiet state of activity in the third trimester of gestation.
References
1 Pincus SM, Viscarello RR. Approximate entropy: a regularity measure for fetal heart rate analysis. Obstet Gynecol1992; 79: 249–255.Search in Google Scholar
2 Di Renzo GC, Montani M, Fioriti V, et al. Fractal analysis: a new method for evaluating fetal heart rate variability. J Perinat Med1996; 24: 261–269.10.1515/jpme.1996.24.3.261Search in Google Scholar
3 Maulik D, Saini V, Zigrossi ST. Clinical significance of short-term variability computed from heart-rate waveforms. J Perinat Med1983; 11: 243–248.10.1515/jpme.1983.11.5.243Search in Google Scholar
4 Keeling WJH. Fetal and neonatal pathology. 3rd edition. London: Springer Verlag 2001.10.1007/978-1-4471-3682-8Search in Google Scholar
5 Meyberg R, Boos R, Babajan A, Ertan AK, Schmidt W. Intrauterine growth retardation – perinatal mortality and postnatal morbidity in a perinatal center. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol2000; 204: 218–223.10.1055/s-2000-9581Search in Google Scholar
6 Peters MJ, Crowe J, Pieri JF, et al. Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods. J Perinat Med2001; 29, 408–416.10.1515/JPM.2001.057Search in Google Scholar
7 Dalton KJ, Dawes GS, Patrick JE. The autonomic nervous system and fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol1983; 146: 456–462.10.1016/0002-9378(83)90828-1Search in Google Scholar
8 Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CB Jr, Bots RS. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum Dev1982; 6: 177–195.10.1016/0378-3782(82)90106-2Search in Google Scholar
9 Van Leeuwen P, Lange S, Bettermann H, Grönemeyer D, Hatzmann W. Fetal heart rate variability and complexity in the course of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev1999; 54: 259–269.10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00102-9Search in Google Scholar
10 Wakai RT, Wang M, Pedron SL, Reid DL, Martin CB Jr. Spectral analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate variability from fetal magnetocardiogram recordings. Early Hum Dev1993; 35: 15–24.10.1016/0378-3782(93)90134-GSearch in Google Scholar
11 Zhuravlev YE, Rassi D, Mishin AA, Emery SJ. Dynamic analysis of beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variability recorded by SQUID magnetometer: quantification of sympatho-vagal balance. Early Hum Dev2002; 66: 1–10.10.1016/S0378-3782(01)00225-0Search in Google Scholar
12 Lange S, Van Leeuwen P, Geue D, Grönemeyer D. Parameterwahl zur Bestimmung der approximierten Entropie (ApEn) bei magnetokardiogaphischen fetalen RR-Zeitreihen. Biomed Tech2001; 46 (Suppl 1): 260–261.10.1515/bmte.2001.46.s1.260Search in Google Scholar
13 Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043–1065.Search in Google Scholar
14 Hoyer D, Leder U, Hoyer H, Pompe B, Sommer M, Zwiener U. Mutual information and phase dependencies: measures of reduced nonlinear cardiorespiratory interactions after myocardial infarction. Med Eng Phys2002; 24: 33–43.10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00120-5Search in Google Scholar
15 Frank B, Pompe B, Schneider U, Hoyer D. Permutation entropy improves fetal behavioural state classification based on heart rate analysis from biomagnetic recordings in near term fetuses. Med Biol Eng Comp2006; 44: 179–187.10.1007/s11517-005-0015-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
