Abstract
This study evaluated a breast self-examination intervention to increase phase-specific self-efficacy and positive outcome expectancies. The role of social cognitive predictors in the process of behavior change was investigated. Using cluster randomization, participants were assigned to an intervention (n = 244) or to a control (n = 173) group. Controls were measured twice, with 13 weeks between the assessments. Respondents from the intervention group received the intervention before the 1st measurement. The increase in the number of self-examination components was significantly higher in the intervention group than among controls. Women who had never performed self-examinations before the intervention, as well as those who did it irregularly or incompletely, changed their behavior significantly. Results of structural equation modeling for a 2-group model showed that phase-specific self-efficacy was a significant predictor of intention, planning, and behavior change in the intervention group. In the control group, these relations were weaker or remained nonsignificant. Social cognitive variables measured in this study explained 15% of variance of behavior change in the control group and 29% of breast self-examination change in the intervention group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alagna, S. W., & Reddy, D. M. (1987). Predictors of proficient technique and successful lesion detection in breast self-examination. Health Psychology, 3, 113–127.
Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Brain, K., Norman, P., Gray, J., & Mansel, R. (1999). Anxiety and adherence to breast self-examination in women with history of breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 181–187.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chalmers, K. I., & Luker, K. A. (1996). Breast self-care practices in women with primary relatives with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 1212–1220.
Champion, V. L. (1990). Breast self examination in women 35 and older: A prospective study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 523–530.
Europa Donna Warszawa (Producer) & Polish Committee to Fight Against Cancer (Producer) (2000). Breast self-examination. Do itforyourself! [Film]. (Available from Europa Donna Warszawa, Oncology Institute, 5 Roentgena Street, Warsaw, Poland)
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
Green, B. B., & Taplin, S. H. (2003). Breast cancer screening controversies. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 16, 233–241.
Hackshaw, A. K., & Paul, E. A. (2003). Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer, 88, 1047–1053.
Hodgkins, S., & Orbell, S. (1998). Can protection motivation theory predict behaviour? A longitudinal test exploring the role of previous behaviour. Psychology and Health, 13, 237–250.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, J. A., Eckhardt, L. E., Mayer, J. A., Bartholomew, S., Malcarne, V. L., Hovell, M. F., & Elder, J. P. (1993). The effects of an instructional audiotape on breast self-examination proficiency. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 225–235
Kenny, D. A. (2000). Multiple group models. Retrieved October 15, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/mgroups.htm
Lerman, C., Kash, K., & Stefanek, M. (1994). Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: Perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 16, 171–176.
Maddux, J. E., Brawley, L., & Boykin, A. (1995). Self-efficacy and health behavior. Prevention, promotion and detection. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 173–202). New York: Plenum.
Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 500–510.
Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.
Mishra, S. I., Chavez, L. R., Magaqa, J. R., Nava, P., Burciaga-Valdez, R., & Hubbell, F. A. (1998). Improving breast cancer control among Latinas: Evolution of a theory-based educational program. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 653–670.
Morrison, C. (1996). Using PRECEDE to predict breast self-examination in older, lower-income women. American Journal of Health Behavior, 20, 3–14.
Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 945–954.
Rippetoe, P. A., & Rogers, R. W. (1987). Effects of components of protection motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with health threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 596–604.
Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford.
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355–1369.
Ruiter, R. A. C., Kok, G., Verplanken, B., & Brug, J. (2001). Evoked fear and effects of appeals on attitudes to performing breast self-examination: An information-processing perspective. Health Education Research, 6, 307–319.
Schwarzer, R. (2001). Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 47–51.
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Constanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., III, Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H., J., & Sener, S. (2003). American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003. Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53, 141–169.
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 236–243.
Thomas, B., Stamler, L. L., Lafreniere, K. D., & Delahunt, T. D. (2002). Breast health educational interventions. Changes in beliefs and practices of working women. American Association of Occupational Nurses Journal, 50, 460–467.
Umeh, K., & Rogan-Gibson, J. (2001). Perceptions of threat, benefits, and barriersin breast self-examination amongst asymptomatic women. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 361–372.
Weiss, N. S. (2003). Breast cancer mortality in relation to clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Breast Journal, 9, 86–89.
Wood, R. Y., Duffy, M. E., Morris, S. J., & Carnes, J. E. (2002). The effect of an educational intervention on promoting breast self-examination in older African American and Caucasian women. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29, 1081–1090.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luszczynska, A. Change in breast self-examination behavior: Effects of intervention on enhancing self-efficacy. Int. J. Behav. Med. 11, 95–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1102_5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1102_5