skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ICT-development in residential care settings: sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we wish to contribute to the recent ICT-design for and reflection of the application field of residential care homes. In doing so, the contribution of the paper is twofold: we wish to highlight some aspects of the every-day life of institutionalized elderly people - trust, sociality, and memory - which not only provoke reflection on design ideas but also on the socio-technical nexus in which design for the elderly has to take place. This domain, we suggest, is one where the 'parachuting in' of technology is unlikely to prove successful, for reasons we examine below. Further, we suggest that design for and with the elderly carries with it some specific problems. We illustrate our methodological reflections by means of an ongoing empirical research project which aims at the development of a large-screen display for a residential care home.

References

  1. Bengtson, V. L., Silverstein, M., and Putney, N. Handbook of theories of aging. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blythe, M., Wright, P., Bowers, J., et al. Age and experience: ludic engagement in a residential care setting. Proc. DIS 2010, ACM (2010), 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bohlmeijer, E. Reminiscence and depression in later life (Dissertation) 2007. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/1871/12886/2/proefschrift_reminiscence_and_depression_in_later_life.pdf (15.09.2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, F. K. Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Clarkson, J. Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Springer, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, G. W., Gibson, L., Hanson, V. L., Bobrowicz, A., and McKay, A. Engaging the disengaged: how do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? Proc. DIS 2010, ACM (2010), 175--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., et al. Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Proc. OZCHI 2003, 4--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., and Benford, S. Moving with the times: IT research and the boundaries of CSCW. Journal Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14, 3, (2005), 217--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Duh, H. B.-L., Do, E. Y.-L., Billinghurst, M., Quek, F., and Chen, V. H.-H. Senior-friendly technologies: interaction design for senior users. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 4513--4516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eaton, S. C. Eldercare in the United States: Inadequate, Inequitable, but Not a Lost Cause. Feminist Economics 11, 2 (2005), 37--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Frost D. and Durrant J. Teachers as Leaders: exploring the impact of teacher-led development work. School Leadership and Management 22, 2 (2002), 143--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6, (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gilleard, C. J. and Higgs, P. Cultures of ageing: self, citizen, and the body. Pearson Education, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Harper, D. Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies 17, 1 (2002), 13--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Harper, R., Randall, D., Smyth, N., Evans, C., Heledd, L., and Moore, R. The past is a different place: they do things differently there. Proc. DIS 2008, ACM (2008), 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., Kort, Y. de, and Poels, K. Digital game design for elderly users. Proc. Future Play 2007, ACM (2007), 17--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Li, L. W. and McLaughlin, S. J. Caregiver Confidence: Does It Predict Changes in Disability Among Elderly Home Care Recipients? The Gerontologist (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindley, S. E., Randall, D., Sharrock, W., Glancy, M., Smyth, N., and Harper, R. Narrative, memory and practice: tensions and choices in the use of a digital artefact. Proc. British HCI, (2009), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Massimi, M., Baecker, R. M., and Wu, M. Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. Proc. ACM SIGACCESS 2007, ACM (2007), 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Newell, A., Arnott, J., Carmichael, A., and Morgan, M. Methodologies for involving older adults in the design process. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human computer interaction:coping with diversity, (2007), 982--989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Newell, A. F. and Gregor, P. User sensitive inclusive design; in search of a new paradigm. Proc. Universal Usability 2000, ACM (2000), 39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Piper, A. M., Campbell, R., and Hollan, J. D. Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 907--916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Räsänen, M. and Nyce, J. M. A new role for anthropology?: rewriting "context" and "analysis" in HCI research. Proc. NordiCHI 2006, ACM (2006), 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Roberts, S. The Fictions, Facts and Future of Older People and Technology. ILC-UK, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robichaud, L., Durand, P. J., Bédard, R., and Ouellet, J. P. Quality of life indicators in long term care: Opinions of elderly residents and their families. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 73, 4 (2006), 245--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rohde, M. Integrated organization and technology development (OTD) and the impact of socio-cultural concepts: a CSCW perspective. http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/3112 (15.10.2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosowsky, E. Ageism and Professional Training in Aging: Who Will Be There To Help? Generations 29, 3 (2005), 55--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shura, R., Siders, R. A., and Dannefer, D. Culture Change in Long-term Care: Participatory Action Research and the Role of the Resident. The Gerontologist 51, 2 (2011), 212--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stark, A. Warm Hands in Cold Age - On the Need of a New World Order of Care. Feminist Economics 11, 2 (2005), 7--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Stolk, R. P., Hutter, I., and Wittek, R. P. M. Population ageing research: a family of disciplines. European Journal of Epidemiology 24, 11 (2009), 715--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Suchman, L. A. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Svensson, M. S. and Sokoler, T. Ticket-to-talk-television: designing for the circumstantial nature of everyday social interaction. Proc. NordiCHI 2008, ACM (2008), 334--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Thomas, W. H. Life Worth Living: How Someone You Love Can Still Enjoy Life in a Nursing Home - The Eden Alternative in Action. Vanderwyk & Burnham, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Timonen, V. and O'Dwyer, C. Living in Institutional Care: Residents' Experiences and Coping Strategies. Social Work in Health Care 48, (2009), 597--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Warschauer, M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yeunsook Lee, Z. Zenn Bien, Mounir Mokhtari, et al. ed. Aging Friendly Technology for Health and Independence: 8th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, ICOST 2010, Seoul, Korea. Springer, Berlin, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ICT-development in residential care settings: sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader