Skip to main content
Log in

Debriefing Following Trauma

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we address three areas. First we review the literature on clinical intervention using debriefing, second we examine who attends debriefings by looking at a study of the 1989 plane crash at Ramstein, Germany and lastly we examine the effect of natural debriefing, i.e., talking to family and friends on psychiatric outcome in disaster workers by looking at a study of the Sioux City, Iowa United plane crash, 1989. Our data suggest that those with high exposure and females were more likely to attend a debriefing. People most likely to talk about the disaster with spouse/significant other, coworker and/or another person were: those with acute PTSD, higher total and intrusive Impact of Event symptoms, older, married, those with higher levels of education and higher levels of disaster exposure. Better understanding of who attends formal debriefings will help identify potential high-risk groups. Similarly, whether talking about the disaster is associated with fewer or greater psychological symptoms is important to understanding the outcome, mechanisms, and risks of debriefing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ursano RJ, Grieger TA, McCarroll, JE: Prevention of posttraumatic stress: Consultation, training and early treatment (pp 441–463), in Truamatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. Edited by Van der Kolk, BA, McFarlane, AC, Weisaeth L, New York: Guilford Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel, RJ, Ursano RJ: Integrative group therapy with disaster workers. In Group Treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Edited by Young, BH, Blake, DD: Ann Arbor, MI: Brunner/Mazel, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shalev A: Debriefing following traumatic exposure (pp 201–220), in Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: Edited by Ursano RJ, McCaughey BG., Fullerton CS., The structure of human chaos, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raphael B: When disaster strikes: A handbook for caring professionals. London: Hutchinson, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunning C: Mental health sequelae in disaster workers: Prevention and intervention. International Journal of Mental Health, 19:91–103, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyregrov A, Mitchell JT: Work with Traumatized Children-Psychological Effects and Coping strategies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5:5–17, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holaday M, Warren-Miller G, Smith, A, Yost, TE: A preliminary investigation of on-the-scene coping mechanisms used by disaster workers. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 347–359, 1995.

  8. Schachter S: The Psychology of Affiliation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gottlieb BH: Theories and practices of mobilizing support in stressful circumstances, in Stress, Medicine, and Health (Vol. 1, pp. 339–374). Edited by Cooper CL, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shalev AY, Schreiber S, Galai, T: Early Psychological Responses to Traumatic Injury. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6(4):441–450, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ: Postraumatic responses in spouse/significant others of disaster workers, (pp 59–76), in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Acute and Long-term Responses to Trauma and Disaster. Edited by Fullerton CS, Ursano, RJ, American Psychiatric Press Inc, Washington, D.C., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fullerton CS, Wright KM, Ursano RJ, McCarroll JE: Psychological responses of rescue workers: fire fighters and trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62(3):371–8, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pennebaker JW, O'Heeron RC: Confiding in Others and Illness rate among Spouses of Suicide and Accidental Death Victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93(473), 1984.

  14. Silver RL, Wortman CB: Copying with undesirable life events. In Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications (pp. 279). Edited by Garber J, Seligman ME, New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janoff-Bulman, R. Shattered assumptions, New York: The Free Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coates D, Winston T: Counteracting the Deviance of Depression: Peer Support Groups for Victims. Journal of Social Issues, 39(169), 1983.

  17. Allen SN, Bloom SL: Group and Family Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 17(2):425–437, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Avery A, King S, Bretherton R, Orner R: Deconstructing psychological debriefing and the emergence of calls for evidence-based practice. Traumatic Stress Points 13(2):6–8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gist R, Lubin B, Redburn BG: Psychosocial, ecological, and community perspectives on disaster response, in Response to Disaster Psychosocial, Community and Ecological perspectives on disaster response (pp 1–20). Edited by Gist R, Lubin B. Ann Arbor, MI: Braun-Brumfield, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matthews LR: Effect of staff debriefing on posttraumatic stress symptoms after assaults by community housing residents, Psychiatric Services, 49, 207–212, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Raphael B, Wilson J, Meldrum L, McFarlane AC: Acute preventive intervention, (pp 463–480), in Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. Edited by Van der Kolk BA, McFarlane AC, Weisaeth L, New York: Guilford Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander DA: Reactions to police officers to body handling after major disaster. British Journal of Psychiatry (1991).

  23. Byrand: Ethical considerations of management of posttraumatic responses. Bull of the Australian Psychological Society, 1994.

  24. Griffith, Watts: The Kempsy and Grafton Buss Crashes: The aftermath. Lismore: New South Wales, 1992.

  25. Hytten K, Hasle A: Firefighters: A study of stress and coping. Actapsychiatr. Scand, Supplement 355(80):50–55, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McFarlane A: The longitudinal course of most traumatic morbidity. The range of outcomes and their predictors. J. Nervous Mental Disease, 1988.

  27. Carlier IVE, Lamberts RG, van Uchelen AJ, Gersons BPR: Disaster related post-traumatic stress in Police Officers: A field study of the impact of debriefing. Stress Medicine 14:143–148, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchel J: The impact of stress on emergency service personnel: Policy issues in emergency response, in Managing Disasters, Strategies, and Policy Perspectives. Edited by Comfort L, 1988.

  29. Saunter: Debriefing from military origin to therapeutic application. J Psychosocial Nursing, 31:23–27, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Everly GS, Boyle S, Lating J: Psychological debriefing: A Meta Analysis. Paper presented at First Nations' Emergency Services Society Critical Incident Stress Conference, Vancover, BC, Canada, 1998.

  31. Everly GS, Boyle S: Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD): A meta analysis. Paper Presented at the Fourth World Congress on Stress, Trauma and Coping in the Emergency Services Professions, Baltimore, MD, 1997.

  32. Epstein RS, Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder following an air disaster: a prospective study. American Journal of Psychiatry 155(7):934–938, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McCarroll JE, Fullerton CS, Ursano, RJ, Hermsen JM: Posttraumatic stress symptoms following forensic dental identification: Mt. Carmel, Waco, Texas. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 153:778–782, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ursano RJ, Fullerton CS, Bhartiya V, Kao TC: Longitundinal Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression after Exposure to Traumatic Death. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 42:36–42, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Horowitz M., Wilner N, Alvarez W: Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41:209–218, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keane TM, Malloy PF, Fairbank JA: Empirical development of an MMPI subscale for the assessment of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorders. J. Consult Clin Psychol, 52:888–891, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zung WWK: A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 12:63–70, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Drabek TE, Key WH: The impact of disaster on primary group linkages. Mass Emergencies, 1:89–105, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Erikson KT: Loss of communality at Buffalo Creek. Am J Psychiatry, 133:302–305, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Winje D, Ulvik A: Confrontations with reality: Crisis intervention services for traumatized families after a school but accident in Norway. J Traumatic stress, 8:429–444, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fullerton, C.S., Ursano, R.J., Vance, K. et al. Debriefing Following Trauma. Psychiatr Q 71, 259–276 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004634227908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004634227908

Keywords

Navigation