Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing age is associated with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies secondary to documented index ventricular tachyarrhythmias

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
European Geriatric Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Editorial to this article was published on 04 June 2019

Key Summary Points

AbstractSection Aim

The study sought to assess the impact of age on recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality at 5 years in consecutive ICD recipients.

AbstractSection Findings

Age ≥ 75 years was associated with higher rates of first recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality at 5 years.

AbstractSection Message

Elderly ICD recipients aged ≥ 75 years are at increased risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality at 5 years.

Abstract

Background

Data regarding the prognostic impact of age in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients is limited.

Objective

The study sought to assess the impact of age on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients.

Methods

This “secondary prevention” study is based on a large retrospective registry including consecutive ICD recipients with documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients < 75 years of age were compared to patients ≥ 75 years. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were ICD-related therapies, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Statistics comprised Kaplan–Meier survival curves, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and propensity-score matching.

Results

A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients with index ventricular tachyarrhythmias was included (< 75 years: 78%; ≥ 75 years 22%). Age ≥ 75 years was associated with the primary endpoint of first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (49% vs. 43%, log-rank p = 0.015; HR 1.418; 95% CI 1.070–1.881; p = 0.015), and with the secondary endpoint of first appropriate ICD therapy (78% vs. 22%, log-rank p = 0.011) even within multivariable Cox regression analyses. After propensity-score matching, age ≥ 75 years was still associated with the primary endpoint of first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (49% vs. 42%, log-rank p = 0.045; HR 1.482; 95% CI 1.007–2.182; p = 0.046).

Conclusion

Elderly ICD recipients aged ≥ 75 years are at increased risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapies, and all-cause mortality at 5 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niccoli T, Partridge L (2012) Ageing as a risk factor for disease. Curr Biol 22(17):R741–R752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zipes DP et al (2006) Guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Executive summary. Rev Esp Cardiol 59(12):1328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Writing Group M et al (2016) Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(4):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Francis Stuart SD et al (2018) Age-related changes in cardiac electrophysiology and calcium handling in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation. J Physiol 596:3977–3991. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP276396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Writing Group M et al (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(4):e38–e360

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mirza M et al (2012) Mechanisms of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 28(4):555–573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aktas MK et al (2014) Comparison of age (< 75 years versus ≥ 75 years) to risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks (from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Am J Cardiol 114(12):1855–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moss AJ et al (1996) Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 335(26):1933–1940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators (1997) A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 337(22):1576–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. John RM et al (2012) Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Lancet 380(9852):1520–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tracy CM et al (2012) 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Heart Rhythm 9(10):1737–1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang AS et al (2005) Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society position paper on implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Canada. Can J Cardiol 21(Suppl A):11A–18A

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suleiman M et al (2014) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy in a real-world setting: data from the Israeli ICD Registry. Heart Rhythm 11(3):435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moss AJ et al (2002) Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 346(12):877–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elming MB et al (2017) Age and outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. Circulation 136(19):1772–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickstein K et al (2008) ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J 29(19):2388–2442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C (2015) 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death summarized by co-chairs. Eur Heart J 36(41):2757–2759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dickstein K et al (2008) ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur J Heart Fail 10(10):933–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Priori SG et al (2015) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 36(41):2793–2867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Khatib SM et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:e91–e220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Authors/Task Force M et al (2010) 2010 Focused update of ESC guidelines on device therapy in heart failure. An update of the 2008 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association. EP Europace 12(11):1526–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferdinand D, Otto M, Weiss C (2016) Get the most from your data: a propensity score model comparison on real-life data. Int J Gen Med 9:123–131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bardy GH et al (2005) Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 352(3):225–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Earley A et al (2014) Effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in subgroups a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 160(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Healey JS et al (2007) Role of the implantable defibrillator among elderly patients with a history of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Eur Heart J 28(14):1746–1749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuck KH et al (2000) Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH). Circulation 102(7):748–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Connolly SJ et al (2000) Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation 101(11):1297–1302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moss AJ et al (2012) Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med 367(24):2275–2283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Manian U, Gula LJ (2016) Arrhythmia management in the elderly-implanted cardioverter defibrillators and prevention of sudden death. Can J Cardiol 32(9):1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swindle JP et al (2010) Implantable cardiac device procedures in older patients: use and in-hospital outcomes. Arch Intern Med 170(7):631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Behnes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no potential conflict of interests to disclose for any author.

Ethical approval

This study is based on a retrospective data analysis/registry and has been approved by the local ethics commission II of the faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg (ethical approval number 2016-612NMA) (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier: NCT02982473).

Informed consent

No informed consent was deemed necessary for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weidner, K., Behnes, M., Weiß, C. et al. Increasing age is associated with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies secondary to documented index ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Eur Geriatr Med 10, 567–576 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00178-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00178-0

Keywords

Navigation