Skip to main content
Log in

The prognostic significance of geriatric syndromes and resources

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Geriatric syndromes (GS) do not fit into discrete disease categories and are often underdiagnosed in hospitalized older adults. Geriatric resources (GR) are also not routinely collected in clinical settings, although this may potentiate the beneficial effects of clinical decisions. The prognostic relevance of GS and GR has never been systematically evaluated through clinical tools developed for clinical decision purposes.

Aim

To ascertain the impact of common GS and GR on patients’ prognosis as assessed by means of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI).

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five hospitalized patients aged 70 years and older underwent a CGA evaluation with calculation of the MPI on admission and discharge. Accordingly, patients were subdivided in low (MPI-1, score 0–0.33), moderate (MPI-2, score 0.34–0.66), and severe (MPI-3, score 0.67–1)-risk of mortality at 1 month and 1 year. Nine GR and 17 GS were identified and collected accordingly.

Results

A lower number of GS and a higher number of GR were shown to be highly significantly correlated with a lower MPI, as well as years of education, grade of care, and number of medications independent of age, sex and number of GS or GR. Underweight and obesity according to the BMI were significantly correlated to higher number of GS. Patients with more GR had a significantly higher chance of being discharged home.

Conclusions

The MPI evaluation together with GS and GR in acute care for older patients should be encouraged to improve clinical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brocklehurst JC (1997) Geriatric medicine in Britain—the growth of a specialty. Age Ageing 4:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lutz W et al (2008) The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer M et al (2009) Hospital discharge planning for frail older people and their family. Are we delivering best practice? A review of the evidence. J Clin Nurs 18:2539–2546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nolte E, Knai C (2015) Assessing chronic disease management in European health systems, Observatory Studies Series, No. 39. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stuck AE, Iliffe S (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inouye SK et al (2007) Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gill TM et al (2002) A program to prevent functional decline in physically frail, elderly persons who live at home. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RT et al (2013) Factors associated with geriatric syndromes in older homeless adults. J Health Care Poor Underserved. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2013.0077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Koroukian SM et al (2016) Combinations of chronic conditions, functional limitations, and geriatric syndromes that predict health outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3590-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez E et al (2011) Prevalence of geriatric syndromes and impact on clinical and functional outcomes in older patients with acute cardiac diseases. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2011.227504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Loon IN et al (2016) The relevance of geriatric impairments in patients starting dialysis: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06660615

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clerencia-Sierra M et al (2015) Multimorbidity patterns in hospitalized older patients: associations among chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132909

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Olde Rikkert MG et al (2003) Geriatric syndromes: medical misnomer or progress in geriatrics? Neth J Med 61:83–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lund Jensen N et al (2017) The impact of socioeconomic status and multimorbidity on mortality: a population-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol 9:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Turjamaa R et al (2013) Forgotten resources of older home care clients: focus group study in Finland. Nurs Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Forstmeier S, Maercker A (2008) Ressourcenorientierte Diagnostik im Alter—Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation. GeroPsych. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-8892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Black K et al (2012) Aging in community: mobilizing a new paradigm of older adults as a core social resource. J Appl Gerontol. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812463984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumgärtel F et al (2015) I care Pflege. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berking M, Rief W (2012) Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie für Bachelor Band II: Therapieverfahren. Lesen, Hören, Lernen im Web. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Polidori MC, Pilotto A (2018) The comprehensive geriatric assessment—patient-centred, goal-oriented care. In: Roller-Wirnsberger R, Singler K, Polidori MC (eds) Learning geriatric medicine. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin F (2010) Comprehensive assessment of the frail older patient. Publishing EUGMS, http://www.eugms.org/fileadmin/user_upload/News_Documents/Publications/Comprehensive_Assessment_of_the_Frail_Older_Patient.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2018

  22. Rubenstein LZ et al (1984) Effectiveness of geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 311:1664–1670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pilotto A et al (2008) Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for one-year mortality from comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenation Res 11:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bureau ML et al (2017) Using a multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to predict mortality in elderly undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 236:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dent E et al (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 31:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer AM et al (2018) New associations of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index. Z Gerontol Geriat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-018-01471-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Warnier RM et al (2016) Validity, reliability, and feasibility of tools to identify frail older patients in inpatient hospital care: a systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging 20:218–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pilotto A et al (2012) Usefulness of the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) in the management of older patients with chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol 25:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baake CP (Hrsg) (2017) Begutachtungsverfahren NBA—Pflegegrad bei Erwachsenen. Walhalla Fachverlag, Regensburg

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bollheimer C et al (2014) Praxishandbuch Altersmedizin. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kane RL et al (2012) The association between geriatric syndromes and survival. J AM Geriatr Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neubart R (2015) Repetitorium Geriatrie: Geriatrische Grundversorgung—Zusatz-Weiterbildung Geriatrie—Schwerpunktbezeichnung Geriatrie. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–176

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Niederfranke A et al (2013) Funkkolleg Altern 1: Die vielen Gesichter des Alterns. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–305

    Google Scholar 

  34. Senn N, Monod S (2015) Development of a comprehensive approach for the early diagnosis of geriatric syndromes in general practice. Front Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wehling M, Burkhardt H (2016) Arzneitherapie für Ältere. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Diegelmann C, Isermann M (2016) Ressourcenorientierte Psychoonkologie: Psyche und Körper ermutigen. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linn BS et al (1968) The cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 16:622–626 (20–30)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bliss MR et al (1966) Mattresses for preventing pressure sores in geriatric patients. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 25:238–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sancarlo D et al (2011) Validation of a modified-Multidimensional Prognostic Index (m-MPI) including the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) for the prediction of one-year mortality in hospitalized elderly patients. J Nutr Health Aging 3:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Katz S et al (1970) Progress in the development of an index of ADL. Gerontologist 10:20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Evert J et al (2003) Morbidity profiles of centenarians: survivors, delayers, and escapers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang DC et al (2015) Association between multiple geriatric syndromes and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older adults: a nationwide study in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Züll C (2015) Berufscodierung. Mannheim, GESIS—Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS Survey Guidelines). https://doi.org/10.15465/gesis-sg_019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results were partly presented at the 2018 annual conference of the German Internal Medicine Society as well as at the 2017 annual conference of the German Geriatrics Society, where the work received the Advancement Award for Interdisciplinary Aging Research of the German Geriatrics Society. The authors are grateful to the patients who took their time during the hospital stay to take part into the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the clinical trial: AMM MCP. Performed the experiments: AMM. Analysed the data: AMM IB GS. Wrote the paper: AMM. Conception of the manuscript: AMM MCP. Critical revisions: AMM IB PTB TB AP MCP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cristina Polidori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany (the study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00010606) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Each patient or proxy respondent signed informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, A.M., Becker, I., Siri, G. et al. The prognostic significance of geriatric syndromes and resources. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 115–124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01168-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01168-9

Keywords

Navigation