Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominelle Sonographie

Teil 3: Hepatobiliäres System und Pankreas

Abdominal sonography

Part 3: Hepatobiliary system and pancreas

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die vorliegende Arbeit erläutert Indikationen und Möglichkeiten zeitgemäßer transabdomineller sonographischer Techniken für die Diagnostik biliärer und pankreatischer Erkrankungen. Die Sonographie hat sich in der Diagnostik von Gallenblasenerkrankungen praktisch uneingeschränkt durchgesetzt. Die Sensitivität liegt für die Cholezystolithiasis bei 98 % und wird kaum von einer anderen Indikation oder Bildgebung erreicht. Die Diagnostik der Choledocholithiasis bleibt auch mit modernster Technik entscheidend abhängig von der Erfahrung des Untersuchers. Die Sensitivität der konventionellen Sonographie zur Erkennung der Choledocholithiasis liegt zwischen 25 und 98 %. Die Endosonographie ist genauer (94–100 %). In der Pankreasdiagnostik ist die transabdominelle Sonographie das erste bildgebende Verfahren. Bei der akuten Pankreatitis ist insbesondere die Beurteilung und die Verlaufskontrolle der pankreatitischen Komplikationen (Pseudozysten, Gefäßkomplikationen, Obstruktionseffekte, Nekrosenbildung und Exsudation) wertvoll.

Abstract

This review summarizes the current knowledge and possibilities for transabdominal ultrasound techniques in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Ultrasound has become widely accepted for the diagnosis of gall bladder diseases as the sensitivity for cholecystolithiasis can be up to 98 % and for bile duct stones it lies between 25 % and 98 % whereas endosonography is more accurate (94–100 %). In the diagnostics of the pancreas ultrasound is the first step in an imaging cascade. In cases of acute pancreatitis the assessment and follow-up of complications (e.g. exsudation, necrosis, pseudocysts, vascular complications and obstructive effects) is particularly valuable. Ductal adenocarcinoma appears to be less vascularized in comparison to the surrounding tissue, while endocrine tumors and some metastases are often hypervascularized. Transabdominal sonography is also helpful in the differentiation of cystic lesions into macrocystic and microcystic adenomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Nuernberg D, Ignee A, Dietrich CF (2007) Ultrasound in gastroenterology. Biliopancreatic system. Med Klin (Munich) 102: 112–126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Hilgers R et al (2004) Catheter probe extraductal EUS reliably detects distal common bile duct abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietrich CF, Hocke M, Jenssen C (2011) Interventional endosonography. Ultraschall Med 32: 8–22 (quiz)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietrich CF, Jenssen C (2011) Evidence based endoscopic ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 49: 599–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33: 33–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wermke W (1989) Ultrasonic diagnosis of gallstone diseases. Z Gesamte Inn Med 44: 377–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirche TO, Russler J, Braden B et al (2004) Sonographic detection of perihepatic lymphadenopathy is an indicator for primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 19: 586–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. EFSUMB (2012) European Course Book. European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, London

  9. Wehrmann T, Aharonoff H, Dietrich CF et al (1997) Do ultrasound parameters allow diagnosis of biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Z Gastroenterol 35: 449–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Todani T, Tabuchi K, Watanabe Y, Kobayashi T (1979) Carcinoma arising in the wall of congenital bile duct cysts. Cancer 44: 1134–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Todani T, Narusue M, Watanabe Y et al (1978) Management of congenital choledochal cyst with intrahepatic involvement. Ann Surg 187: 272–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M et al (1977) Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 134: 263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirche TO, Russler J, Schroder O et al (2002) The value of routinely performed ultrasonography in patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 37: 1178–1183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schiemann U, Dayyani V, Muller-Lisse UG, Siebeck M (2004) Aerobilia as an initial sign of a cholecystoduodenal fistula – a case report. MMW Fortschr Med 146: 39–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui XW, Ignee A, Braden B et al (2012) Biliary papillomatosis and new ultrasound imaging modalities. Z Gastroenterol 50: 226–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietrich CF (2012) Gastrointestinal ultrasound update 2011. Praxis (Bern) 101: 239–250

  17. Dietrich CF, Hocke M (2011) Endosonographie zystischer Pankreasläsionen. Viszeralmedizin 27: 194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29: 28–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis. Z Gastroenterol 43: 737–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seifert H, Dietrich C, Schmitt T et al (2000) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided one-step transmural drainage of cystic abdominal lesions with a large-channel echo endoscope. Endoscopy 32: 255–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bunk A, Unger W, Friedberg R, Hildebrandt E (1990) Results of sonographically-guided percutaneous procedures as therapy of liquid-filled space-occupying lesions in acute abdomen. Zentralbl Chir 115: 1101–1111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorffel T, Wruck T, Ruckert RI et al (2000) Vascular complications in acute pancreatitis assessed by color duplex ultrasonography. Pancreas 21: 126–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12: 246–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E et al (2004) Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 126: 1330–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hocke M, Schmidt C, Zimmer B et al (2008) Contrast enhanced endosonography for improving differential diagnosis between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133: 1888–1892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF (2011) Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 43: 163–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF (2011) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 43 (Suppl 2 UCTN): E381–E382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott M, Ignee A (2009) Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 41: 718–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beyer-Enke SA, Hocke M, Ignee A et al (2010) Contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound in the characterisation of pancreatic lesions with cystic appearance. JOP 11: 427–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dietrich CF, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Hocke M (2012) Comments on the EFSUMB non-liver Guidelines 2011. Praxis (Bern) 101: 1175–1181

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dietrich CF, Cui XW, Schreiber-Dietrich DG, Ignee A (2012) EFSUMB guidelines 2011: comments and illustrations. Ultraschall Med 33 (Suppl 1): S11–S21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Allescher HD et al (2008) Differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions using endoscopic ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 46: 601–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adler G, Seufferlein T, Bischoff SC et al (2007) S3-Leitlinie „Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom“ 2007. Z Gastroenterol 45: 487–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology – an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23: 743–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rickes S, Unkrodt K, Ocran K et al (2000) Evaluation of doppler ultrasonography criteria for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. Ultraschall Med 21: 253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Flath B, Rickes S, Schweigert M et al (2003) Differentiation of a pancreatic metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma from a primary pancreatic carcinoma by echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography. Pancreatology 3: 349–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cylwik B, Nowak HF, Glowinska L (1984) Malignant neoplasms of the pancreas. A study based on autopsy data from 1953 to 1982 in Bialystok, Poland. II. A survey of 195 cases. Neoplasma 31: 605–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishii T, Maeda K, Nakamura K, Hosoda Y (1979) Cancer in the aged: an autopsy study of 940 cancer patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 27: 307–313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshimori M, Nakamura K, Ozaki H (1978) Malignant tumor of the pancreas. A clinical study based on autopsy cases from 1963 to 1975 in National Cancer Center Hospital (part 3) (author’s transl). Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 75: 1377–1385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parkash O (1975) Carcinoma of pancreas. A study based on autopsy data from 1928 to 1972 in Vienna, Austria. Digestion 13: 137–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jarnerot G, Rajs J (1971) Carcinoma of the pancreas. A pathological-anatomical and clinical analysis of a series of autopsy cases. Nord Med 85: 206–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. D’Onofrio M, Barbi E, Dietrich CF et al (2012) Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS). Eur J Radiol 81: 630–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. C.F. Dietrich gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.F. Dietrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietrich, C., Schreiber-Dietrich, D. & Nürnberg, D. Abdominelle Sonographie. Gastroenterologe 9, 159–171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-013-0816-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-013-0816-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation