Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with patient positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective non-placebo and non-randomized study

  • Urology - Original article
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods

Between September 2010 and June 2014, 534 patients who underwent RALP were evaluated. Patients were positioned in operating theater by operating room staff, and two independent urologists noted postoperative follow-up. Patient’s demographic data, postoperative complications associated with positioning, pain score according to visual analogue scale, and hospital stay were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications were observed in 54 (10.1 %) and 27 (5 %) patients, respectively. We found ASA, BMI, and comorbidities were significantly associated with postoperative pain levels in univariate analyses (p = 0.01, p = 0.013, and p = 0.01, respectively). Additionally, ASA, previous operations, and comorbidities were significantly associated with postoperative neuromuscular complications (p = 0.04, p = 0.01, and p = 0.02, respectively). According to statistical analyses, BMI < 30 and presence of an implant were significantly associated with postoperative pain in multivariate logistic regression analyses (p = 0.010 and p = 0.033, respectively). Additionally, having comorbidities was significantly associated with postoperative neuromuscular complications in multivariate analyses (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Patients with previous operations, comorbidities, and high ASA score are at risk of neuromuscular complications during RALP. Lower BMI and having an implant also lead to higher postoperative pain. Operating room staff and anaesthesia team should be very careful with patients undergoing RALP in steep Trendelenburg and low-lithotomy position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chitlik A (2011) Safe positioning for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. AORN J 94:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghazi A, Scosyrev E, Patel H, Messing EM, Joseph JV (2013) Complications associated with extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the standardized Martin classification. Urology 81:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wen T, Deibert CM, Siringo FS, Spencer BA (2014) Positioning-related complications of minimally invasive radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 28:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fumo MJ, Hemal AK, Menon M (2006) Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. In: Naito S, Hirao Y, Terachi T (eds) Endourological management of urogenital carcinoma. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 175–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopes CM, Galvão CM (2010) Surgical positioning: evidence for nursing care. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 18:287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gözen AS, Akin Y, Akgul M, Yazici C, Klein J, Rassweiler J (2014) A novel practical trocar placement technique for extraperitoneal laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with lower midline abdominal incisions. JLAST 24:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  8. St-Arnaud D, Paquin M (2008) Safe positioning for neurosurgical patients. AORN J 87:1156–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mills JT, Burris MB, Warburton DJ, Conaway MR, Schenkman NS, Krupski TL (2013) Positioning injuries associated with robotic assisted urological surgery. J Urol 190:580–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pick DL, Lee DI, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE (2004) Anatomic guide for port placement for DaVinci robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 18:572–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, Roth A, Yan W, Fernandez S, Roth S, Patel V (2009) The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 109:473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Mottrie A, Absalom A, Mortier EP, Struys MM (2010) Influence of steep trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 104:433–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi EM, Na S, Choi SH, An J, Rha KH, Oh YJ (2011) Comparison of volume controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 23:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Natalin RA, Landman J (2010) Positional and neuromuscular complications of laparoscopic and robotic urologic surgery. In: Ghavamian R (ed) complications of laparoscopic and robotic urologic surgery. Springer, New York, pp 35–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mattei A, Di Pierro GB, Rafeld V, Konrad C, Beutler J, Danuser H (2013) Positioning injury, rhabdomyolysis, and serum creatine kinase-concentration course in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J Endourol 27:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phong SV, Koh LK (2007) Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesthesiol Intensive Care 35:281–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber ED, Colyer MH, Lesser RL, Subramanian PS (2007) Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy. J Neuroophthalmol 27:285–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akhavan A, Gainsburg DM, Stock JA (2010) Complications associated with patients positioning in urologic surgery. Urology 76:1309–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koc G, Tazeh NN, Joudi FN, Winfield HN, Tracy CR, Brown JA (2012) Lower extremity neuropathies after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on a split-leg table. J Endourol 26:1026–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The abstract of the present study was presented at the 16th European Association of Urology Nurses (EAUN) Meeting, 21 March 2015, Madrid, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Serdar Gozen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gezginci, E., Ozkaptan, O., Yalcin, S. et al. Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with patient positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective non-placebo and non-randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 1635–1641 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1088-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1088-8

Keywords

Navigation