Abstract
Introduction With improvements in diagnosis, treatment and survival rates, returning to work after cancer is of increasing importance to individuals and employers. Although line managers can play a potentially important role in the return to work process, research thus far has focused on the return to work process from the perspective of cancer survivors. Aim To explore the attitudes of line managers towards employees with a cancer diagnosis. Methods A short self-administered, on-line questionnaire was circulated to managers in the North East of England. Factorial structures of the line managers’ attitudes survey was examined using exploratory factor analysis and the effect of demographic characteristics and organisational variable on the attitudes of line managers was examined using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results Line managers’ attitudes can be conceptualized according to five empirical factors: (a) fearful attitudes towards cancer survivors, (b) supportive attitudes, (c) line-managers’ perceived burden, (d) maintaining normality, and (e) financial benefits issues. Overall, line-managers hold relatively positive attitudes toward cancer survivors and are willing to support them in their effort to return to work. However, managers tend to harbour negative attitudes regarding the individual cancer survivors’ ability both to engage in work related activities and in meeting the demands of employment. MANOVA results also indicated that female managers hold more positive attitudes than male managers toward cancer diagnosis, less concerned about workload burdens of working with cancer survivors, and more willing to help cancer survivors maintain normality. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that employers/line-managers need to be provided with training, support, and resources to help them facilitate employment and job retention of employees diagnosed with cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Disability Discrimination Act (Online). 2005. (cited 2008 Oct 15); Available from: URL:http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050013_en_1/.
Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.
Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.
Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35.
Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:914–20.
Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.
Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Masse B, Deschenes L. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1813–22.
Perry EL, Kuhlik CT. The devolution of HR to the line: implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19:262–73.
Heraty N, Morley M. Line managers and human resource development. J Eur Indust Train. 1995;19:31–7.
Renwick D. Line manager involvement in HRM: an inside view. Employee Relat. 2003;25:262–80.
Thornhill A, Saunders MNK. What if line managers don’t realise they’re responsible for HR? Lessons from an organisation experiencing rapid change. Pers Rev. 1998;27:460–76.
Bond S, Wise S. Family leave policies and devolution to the line. Pers Rev. 2003;32:58–72.
Cunningham I, Hyman J. Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line: beginning of the end or a new beginning for personnel? Pers Rev. 1999;28:9–27.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, de Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:817–23.
Kushnir T, Luria O. Supervisors’ attitudes towards return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:331–7.
Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273–90.
CIPD/ Cancer backup/ Working with cancer. Survey report (Online). 2006 (cited 2008 Oct 15). Available from: URL:http://www.cancerbackup.org.uk/News/Mediacentre/Pressreleasesstatements/2006/Newguidancetoaddresslackofsupportforemployeesaffectedbycancer/Surveyfinal.pdf.
Amir Z, Wynn P, Whitaker S, Luker K. Cancer survivorship and return to work: a survey of UK occupational physician experience. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):390–6.
Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta analysis of responses rates in web or internet based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.
Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:464–94.
Chan F, Cardoso L, Copeland J, Jones R, Fraser R. Workplace accommodations. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Handbook of cancer survivorship and work. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 223–54.
Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 73–89.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to all participants who took part in this survey and to Macmillan Cancer support (UK) who funded this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amir, Z., Wynn, P., Chan, F. et al. Return to Work After Cancer in the UK: Attitudes and Experiences of Line Managers. J Occup Rehabil 20, 435–442 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9197-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9197-9