Skip to main content
Log in

Return to Work After Cancer in the UK: Attitudes and Experiences of Line Managers

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction With improvements in diagnosis, treatment and survival rates, returning to work after cancer is of increasing importance to individuals and employers. Although line managers can play a potentially important role in the return to work process, research thus far has focused on the return to work process from the perspective of cancer survivors. Aim To explore the attitudes of line managers towards employees with a cancer diagnosis. Methods A short self-administered, on-line questionnaire was circulated to managers in the North East of England. Factorial structures of the line managers’ attitudes survey was examined using exploratory factor analysis and the effect of demographic characteristics and organisational variable on the attitudes of line managers was examined using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results Line managers’ attitudes can be conceptualized according to five empirical factors: (a) fearful attitudes towards cancer survivors, (b) supportive attitudes, (c) line-managers’ perceived burden, (d) maintaining normality, and (e) financial benefits issues. Overall, line-managers hold relatively positive attitudes toward cancer survivors and are willing to support them in their effort to return to work. However, managers tend to harbour negative attitudes regarding the individual cancer survivors’ ability both to engage in work related activities and in meeting the demands of employment. MANOVA results also indicated that female managers hold more positive attitudes than male managers toward cancer diagnosis, less concerned about workload burdens of working with cancer survivors, and more willing to help cancer survivors maintain normality. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that employers/line-managers need to be provided with training, support, and resources to help them facilitate employment and job retention of employees diagnosed with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Disability Discrimination Act (Online). 2005. (cited 2008 Oct 15); Available from: URL:http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050013_en_1/.

  2. Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:914–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Masse B, Deschenes L. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1813–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perry EL, Kuhlik CT. The devolution of HR to the line: implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19:262–73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heraty N, Morley M. Line managers and human resource development. J Eur Indust Train. 1995;19:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Renwick D. Line manager involvement in HRM: an inside view. Employee Relat. 2003;25:262–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thornhill A, Saunders MNK. What if line managers don’t realise they’re responsible for HR? Lessons from an organisation experiencing rapid change. Pers Rev. 1998;27:460–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bond S, Wise S. Family leave policies and devolution to the line. Pers Rev. 2003;32:58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cunningham I, Hyman J. Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line: beginning of the end or a new beginning for personnel? Pers Rev. 1999;28:9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, de Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kushnir T, Luria O. Supervisors’ attitudes towards return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. CIPD/ Cancer backup/ Working with cancer. Survey report (Online). 2006 (cited 2008 Oct 15). Available from: URL:http://www.cancerbackup.org.uk/News/Mediacentre/Pressreleasesstatements/2006/Newguidancetoaddresslackofsupportforemployeesaffectedbycancer/Surveyfinal.pdf.

  18. Amir Z, Wynn P, Whitaker S, Luker K. Cancer survivorship and return to work: a survey of UK occupational physician experience. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):390–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta analysis of responses rates in web or internet based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:464–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan F, Cardoso L, Copeland J, Jones R, Fraser R. Workplace accommodations. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Handbook of cancer survivorship and work. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 223–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to all participants who took part in this survey and to Macmillan Cancer support (UK) who funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fong Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amir, Z., Wynn, P., Chan, F. et al. Return to Work After Cancer in the UK: Attitudes and Experiences of Line Managers. J Occup Rehabil 20, 435–442 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9197-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9197-9

Keywords

Navigation