Skip to main content
Log in

Lungenembolie

Pulmonary embolism

  • CME Weiterbildung • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Pneumologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Lungenembolien sind relativ häufig, bleiben oft asymptomatisch, enden aber nicht selten fatal. Während die akute Lungenembolie das höchste Mortalitätsrisiko innerhalb der ersten Stunde nach dem Ereignis hat, dauert es bei der chronisch thromboembolischen pulmonalen Hypertonie oft viele Jahre, bis sich eine bedrohliche Rechtsherzinsuffizienz entwickelt. Obwohl beide Erkrankungen miteinander verwandt sind, weisen sie unterschiedliche pathologische Mechanismen auf und erfordern unterschiedliche diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen. Bei klinischem Verdacht auf akute Lungenembolie hilft ein evidenzbasierter diagnostischer Algorithmus bei der Entscheidung, ob eine Antikoagulation eingeleitet werden muss oder mit akzeptablem Risiko darauf verzichtet werden kann. Bei vorhandener Embolie kann die Entscheidung für oder gegen eine Lysetherapie mithilfe eines evidenzbasierten therapeutischen Algorithmus getroffen werden. Risikofaktoren der Lungenembolie müssen gegen die der Lyse abgewogen werden. Biomarker wie BNP und TNT sowie die Echokardiographie gewinnen an Stellenwert. Wichtig ist die klinische Aufmerksamkeit, damit die Verdachtsdiagnose gestellt wird. Hinweisend sind nicht nur die Beschwerden, sondern auch die Risikokonstellation, die wissenschaftlich zunehmend Beachtung findet.

Abstract

Thromboembolic events are frequent and may remain asymptomatic but possess a considerable mortality risk. During the first hour, acute events pose the highest mortality risk, while chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension often gradually develops over a period of many years before it leads to right heart failure. Although the two diseases are related, they involve different pathologic mechanisms and require different diagnostic and therapeutic management. In patients with suspected acute thromboembolism, an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm helps decide whether to begin anticoagulation treatment or to withhold it with a tolerable risk. In patients suffering an acute event, an evidence-based therapeutic algorithm helps decide whether thrombolysis should be considered. Echocardiography and biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin are becoming increasingly important. Clinical awareness of thromboembolic events is of the utmost importance. Not only the patients’ complaints but also the acknowledgement of risk factors are helpful and are attracting increasing scientific interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Tillie-Leblond I, Marquette CH, Perez T et al. (2006) Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors. Ann Intern Med 144(6): 390–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horlander KT, Mannino DM, Leeper KV (2003) Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States, 1979–1998: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Arch Intern Med 163(14): 1711–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M et al. (2007) Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 146(4): 278–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Monreal M, Falga C, Valle R et al. (2006) Venous thromboembolism in patients with renal insufficiency: findings from the RIETE Registry. Am J Med 119(12): 1073–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galli M, Borrelli G, Jacobsen EM et al. (2007) Clinical significance of different antiphospholipid antibodies in the WAPS (warfarin in the antiphospholipid syndrome) study. Blood 110(4): 1178–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corral J, Hernandez-Espinosa D, Soria JM et al. (2007) Antithrombin Cambridge II (A384S): an underestimated genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis. Blood 109(10): 4258–4263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ray JG, Kearon C, Yi Q et al. (2007) Homocysteine-lowering therapy and risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146(11): 761–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Vlijmen EF, Brouwer JL, Veeger NJ et al. (2007) Oral contraceptives and the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects: results from a retrospective family cohort study. Arch Intern Med 167(3): 282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lobo JL, Zorrilla V, Aizpuru F et al. (2006) Clinical syndromes and clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism: findings from the RIETE registry. Chest 130(6): 1817–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA et al. (1991) Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 100(3): 598–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O et al. (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352(17): 1760–1768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al. (2000) Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 83(3): 416–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al. (2001) Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 135(2): 98–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD et al. (2004) Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 126(3 Suppl): 401S–428S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan S, Quinlan DJ, Agnelli G, Eikelboom JW (2004) Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Circulation 110(6): 744–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A et al. (1997) Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 30(5): 1165–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kucher N, Printzen G, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107(20): 2545–2547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M et al. (2002) Importance of cardiac troponins I and T in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 106(10): 1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ (2006) Massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 113(4): 577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Schoepf UJ et al. (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109(20): 2401–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoepf UJ, Kucher N, Kipfmueller F et al. (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: a predictor of early death in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 110(20): 3276–3280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G et al. (2002) Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 347(15): 1143–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leacche M, Unic D, Goldhaber SZ et al. (2005) Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129(5): 1018–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang IM (2004) Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension – not so rare after all. N Engl J Med 350(22): 2236–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonderman D, Skoro-Sajer N, Jakowitsch J et al. (2007) Predictors of outcome in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 115(16): 2153–2158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olschewski H, Hoeper MM, Borst MM et al. (2006) Diagnosis and therapy of chronic pulmonary hypertension. Pneumologie 60(12): 749–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galie N et al. (2002) Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 347(5): 322–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hughes RJ, Jais X, Bonderman D et al. (2006) The efficacy of bosentan in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a 1-year follow-up study. Eur Respir J 28(1): 138–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghofrani HA, Schermuly RT, Rose F et al. (2003) Sildenafil for long-term treatment of nonoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167(8): 1139–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reichenberger F, Voswinckel R, Enke B et al. (2005) Long-term treatment with oral sildenafil improves exercise capacity and hemodynamics patients with non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 112(17): U151

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reichenberger F, Voswinckel R, Enke B et al. (2007) Long-term treatment with sildenafil in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J (in press)

  32. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A et al. (1997) Prognostic significance of right ventricular afterload stress detected by echocardiography in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Heart 77(4): 346–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Matthys H, Seeger W (2008) Klinische Pneumologie, 4. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in press)

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Olschewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olschewski, H. Lungenembolie. Pneumologe 5, 45–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10405-007-0188-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10405-007-0188-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation