Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do the currently proposed DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa adequately consider developmental aspects in children and adolescents?

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss the proposed criteria of the fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) for anorexia nervosa (AN) and to compare these with an alternative proposal which is based on a broader conception of the AN phenotype (Hebebrand and Bulik, in press). The proposed DSM-5 criteria seem to only insufficiently resolve the problems inherent to the current classification of AN because (1) the A criterion does not include a reference to allow the clinician to decide if the (young) patient meets the weight criterion, (2) the AN patient first must have evolved the cognitive capacity for complex abstract reasoning in order to fulfill the criteria B and C (Bravender et al. in Eur Eat Disord Rev 18:79–89, 2010), (3) physical symptoms of starvation including the neuroendocrine dysfunction characteristic of AN are not a diagnostic requirement, and (4) the subtypes are not helpful for classification of younger patients who almost all have the restricting type. On these grounds the proposed DSM-5 criteria will perpetuate the diagnostic tradition of a high percentage of patients who are subsumed under the diagnosis of eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS), thus hampering both clinical practice and research. The use of our recently proposed alternative criteria for AN would result in most children and adolescents with an AN-like phenotype receiving a diagnosis of AN. Accordingly, our proposed criteria would be readily applicable to children, adolescents and adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker AE, Eddy KT, Perloe A (2009) Clarifying criteria for cognitive signs and symptoms for eating disorders in DSM-V. Int J Eat Disord 42:611–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hebebrand J, Bulik CM (2010) Critical appraisal of the provisional DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa and an alternative proposal (in press)

  3. Bravender T, Bryant-Waugh R, Herzog D, Katzman D, Kriepe RD, Lask B et al (2010) Classification of eating disturbance in children and adolescents: proposed changes for the DSM-V. Eur Eat Disord Rev 18:79–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eddy KT, Celio Doyle A, Hoste RR, Herzog DB, le Grange D (2008) Eating disorder not otherwise specified in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47(2):156–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peláez Fernández MA, Labrador FJ, Raich RM (2007) Prevalence of eating disorders among adolescent and young adult scholastic population in the region of Madrid (Spain). J Psychosom Res 62(6):681–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulik C, PF S, Fear J, Pickering A (1997) Predictors of the development of bulimia nervosa in women with anorexia nervosa. J Nerv Ment Dis 185:704–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eddy KT, Dorer DJ, Franko DL, Tahilani K, Thompson-Brenner H, Herzog DB (2008) Diagnostic crossover in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: implications for DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry 165:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hebebrand J, Casper R, Treasure J, Schweiger U (2004) The need to revise the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa. J Neural Transm 111:827–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Müller B, Herpertz S, Heussen N, Hebebrand J, Remschmidt H (2001) Prospective 10-year follow-up in adolescent anorexia nervosa—course, outcome, psychiatric comorbidity, and psychosocial adaptation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42(5):603–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peat C, Mitchell JE, Hoek HW, Wonderlich SA (2009) Validity and utility of subtyping anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 42(7):590–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bravender T, Bryant-Waugh R, Herzog D, Katzman D, Kreipe RD, Lask B, Le Grange D, Lock J, Loeb K, Madden S, Nicholls D, O’Toole J, Pinhas L, Rome E, Sokol-Burger M, Wallen U, Zucker N (2007) Workgroup for Classification of Eating Disorders in Children and Adolescents Classification of child and adolescent eating disturbances. Workgroup for Classification of Eating Disorders in Children and Adolescents (WCEDCA). Int J Eat Disord 40:117–122 (review)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hebebrand J, Muller T, Holtkamp K, Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2007) The role of leptin in anorexia nervosa: clinical implications. Mol Psychiatry 12:23–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heymsfield SB, Darby PC, Muhlheim LS, Gallagher D, Wolper C, Allison DB (1995) The calorie: myth, measurement, and reality. Am J Clin Nutr 62:1034S–1041S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barlow S (2007) Expert Committee. Expect committee recommendations regarding prevention, assessment and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 120:S164–S192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinheiro A, Thornton L, Plotonicov K, Tozzi T, Klump K, Berrettini W et al (2007) Patterns of menstrual disturbance in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 40:424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peebles R, Hardy KK, Wilson JL, Lock JD (2010) Are diagnostic criteria for eating disorders markers of medical severity? Pediatrics 125(5):e1193–e1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) CDC Growth Charts: United States. CDC National Center for Health Statistics 2000

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 245009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Hebebrand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knoll, S., Bulik, C.M. & Hebebrand, J. Do the currently proposed DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa adequately consider developmental aspects in children and adolescents?. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20, 95–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-010-0141-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-010-0141-5

Keywords

Navigation