Skip to main content
Log in

Disaster response. Natural disaster: Katrina

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aftermath and response to a disaster can be divided into four phases. The importance of each depends on the length of time without resupply and the resources that are required. This in turn depends on the time span of the disaster; the area involved; the number of the population affected; the resupply available; the extent of the devastation; and the size of the evacuation. The above phases are discussed using hurricane Katrina as an example. The phases are as follows: immediate response, evacuation, backfill and resupply, and restoration. The restoration phase is usually the longest and requires the most resources. This article addresses the situation of Katrina, the mistakes that were made, the lessons that were learned, and the solutions that are needed. Appropriate training and practice are required for all participants using realistic scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McSwain N. Disaster preparedness perspective from 90.05.32w, 29.57.18n. Crit Care 2006;10(1):108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fordis M, Alexander JD, McKellar J. Role of a database-driven web site in the immediate disaster response and recovery of Academic Health Center: the Katrina experience. Acad Med 2007;82(8):769–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kankakee, IL: two hospitals; a middle-of-the-night train crash; 114 injured-how their disaster plans played out. Hosp Secur Saf Manage 1999;20(2):5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tanner A, Friedman DB, Koskan A, Barr D. Disaster communication on the internet: a focus on mobilizing information. J Health Commun 2009;14(8):741–755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Virginia Tech disaster response shows value of regular drills and planning. ED Manage 2007;19(6):61–63.

  6. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D. Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 2007;97(suppl 1):S109–S115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans D. Simulated aircraft disaster instructional exercise at Baltimore-Washington International Airport. Aviat Space Environ Med 1976;47(4):445–448.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson GA, Calkins A. Prehospital triage and communication performance in small mass casualty incidents: a gauge for disaster preparedness. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17(2):148–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The “terrifying” Seattle/Olympia earthquake: a learning experience for area hospitals about disaster plans. Hosp Secur Saf Manage 2001;21(12):5–10.

  10. Avoid disasters during your next JCAHO survey: quality managers share secrets. Hosp Peer Rev 2004;29(7):89–93.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McSwain, N.E. Disaster response. Natural disaster: Katrina. Surg Today 40, 587–591 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4090-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4090-2

Key words

Navigation