Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of tracheostomy on the nose

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish the effect of tracheostomy on nasal function and quality of life. Teaching Hospital, Scotland, UK. Cross-sectional case–control study. Two groups of patients were selected; a group of ten patients who underwent surgical tracheostomy and a control group of ten patients with confirmed or suspected head and neck malignancy that did not require tracheostomy. Two questionnaires, the SNOT-22 quality of life instrument, and the Rhinogram nasal symptoms score were used to evaluate each group. For the Rhinogram questionnaire the median total score was 13.5 for the tracheostomy group and 2 for the control group (P = 0.02) whilst for the SNOT-22, the mean total scores were 39 and 29, respectively (P = 0.205). The tracheostomy group scored worse for all Rhinogram questions, and for the anosmia score this was independently statistically significant (5 vs. 0 units, P = 0.001). The tracheostomy group most commonly identified “loss of smell & taste” as their most important symptom, compared with only 2 subjects in the control group. Tracheostomy can give rise to nasal symptoms. This needs to be addressed in the routine follow up of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tos M, Mogensen C (1979) Experimental surgery on the nose. Changes of the epithelium in the vestibular region at altered airflow. Acta Otolaryngol 87:317–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cvetnic V, Batistic B, Sankovic F (1987) Cytological & histological alterations in the nasal mucous membrane during experimental obstruction of nasal openings. Rhinology 25:5–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shin SH, Heo WW (2005) Effects of unilateral naris closure on the nasal & maxillary sinus mucosa in the rabbit. Auris Nasus Larynx 32:139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyce J, Eccles R (2006) Do chronic changes in nasal airflow have any physiological effect on the nose and paranasal sinuses? A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 31:15–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilgers FJM, Van Dam FSAM, Keyzers S, Koster MN, Van As CJ, Muller MJ (2000) Rehabilitation of olfaction after laryngectomy by means of a nasal airflow inducing maneuver. The “polite yawning” technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:726–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magardino TM, Suskind-Liu D, Kroger H, Mirza N (2001) Ipratroprium nasal spray for the treatment of rhinorrhea in the laryngectomized patient: a pilot study. Am J Rhinol 15:203–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McNeill EJM, Samuel PR (2005) Nasal polyposis in the laryngectomee. JLO 119:57–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maurizi M, Paludetti G, Almadori G, Ottaviani F, Todisco T (1986) Mucociliary clearance and mucosal surface characteristics before and after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 102:136–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cvetnic V, Sips D (1988) Clinical and cytological alterations in nasal mucosa in laryngectomized patients. Rhinology 26:183–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher EW, Lund VJ, Rutman A (1992) The human nasal mucosa after deprivation of the airflow. A study of laryngectomy patients. Rhinology 30:5–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozdem C, Ercan MT (1984) Measurement of blood flow to human nasal mucosa in normal and pathological conditions by the use of the 133Xe clearance technique. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 239:219–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bende M (1983) Blood flow in human nasal mucosa after laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 96:529–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Toppozada HH, Gaafar HA (1976) Human nasal blood vessels after permanent tracheostomy electron-microscopic study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 38:35–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Havas TE, Cole P, Gullane P, Kassel R (1987) Alterations in nasal physiology. The nasal cycle. J Otolaryngol 16:149–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher EW, Lui M, Lund VJ (1994) The nasal cycle after deprivation of airflow. A study of laryngectomy patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 114:443–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morley AD, Sharp HR (2006) A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems-which is best? Clin Otolaryngol 31:103–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hopkins C (2009) Patient reported outcome measures in Rhinology. Rhinology 47:10–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piccirillo J, Merritt M, Richards M (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT 20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccirillo JF, Edwards D, Haiduk A (1995) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 31-item Rhinosinusitis outcome test (RSOM-31). Am J Rhinol 9:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buckland JR, Thomas S, Harries PG (2003) Can the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT 22) be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol 28:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Browne JP, Hopkins C, Slack R et al (2006) Health-related quality of life after polypectomy with and without additional surgery. Laryngoscope 116:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Srouji IA, Andrews P, Edwards C, Lund VJ (2006) General and rhinosinusitis-related quality of life in patients with wegener’s granulomatosis. Laryngoscope 116:1621–1625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Oene CM, Van Reij E, Sprangers M, Fokkens WJ (2007) Quality assessment of disease specific quality of life questionnaires for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. A systematic review. Allergy 62:1359–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test. Clin Otolaryngol 34:447–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lund VJ, Kennedy DW (1995) Staging and therapy group. Quantification for staging sinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 167:17–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR (1993) Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal inspiratory peak flow rate. Clin Otolaryngol 18:19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. White P (2004) Subjective scoring systems in Rhinology. ENT News 12:50–51

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patel PM, Maskell S, Heywood R, Eze N, Hern J (2010) Prospective, comparative, cohort study comparing the rhinogram, sino-nasal outcome test 20 and health-related quality of life questionnaire. JLO 124:623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, D1 9SY, Scotland, UK

    A. Tsikoudas, M. L. Barnes & P. White

  2. Department of Otolaryngology, Consultant ENT Surgeon, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, NE7 7DN, UK

    A. Tsikoudas

Authors
  1. A. Tsikoudas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. L. Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tsikoudas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsikoudas, A., Barnes, M.L. & White, P. The impact of tracheostomy on the nose. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268, 1005–1008 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1522-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1522-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation