Skip to main content
Log in

Could mastication modify the shape of the orbit? A scannographic study in humans

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Since prehistory, changes of the facial skeleton have been related to the modification of diet. More recent studies have shown changes in the morphology of the mandible and maxilla due to variations of strain during mastication. The temporal muscle (TM) is a strong masticatory muscle, with its insertions extending through the temporal fossa. Our objective is to observe the relations between the TM and the lateral orbital wall (LOW) which could indicate an influence of mastication on the shape of the LOW.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study using 100 CT scans. The length of the lateral orbital wall (LLOW), the angle between LOW and the medial orbital wall (MOW), the cross-sectional areas of LOW and of the TMs were measured on both sides of each CT scan. The correlation between TMs and other three parameters was studied by Pearson correlations.

Results

A correlation was found between TMs and LOWs, a lower with LLOW, and a very weak and negative correlation between LOW/MOW angle.

Conclusions

Anatomical knowledge about TM and investigation of masticatory strains lead us to think that mastication have minimal effect on the morphology of the LOW, only on the frontal process of zygomatic. This may explain, in part, why the LOW is the strongest wall of the orbit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bénateau H, Labbé D, Rigot-Jolivet M, Elissalde JM, Salamé E (2002) The temporal periosteum: anatomical study and surgical implications. Annales de chirurgie plastique esthetique 47(3):189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP (1999) Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 21:659–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson DS, Van Gerven DP (1977) Masticatory function and post-Pleistocene evolution in Nubia. Am J Phys Anthropol 46:495–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ducasse A (2007) Surgical orbital anatomy. Oculoplastics and orbit. Springer, New York, pp 73–97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engström C, Kiliaridis S, Thilander B (1986) The relationship between masticatory function and craniofacial morphology. II. A histological study in the growing rat fed a soft diet. Eur J Orthod 8:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Enlow DH (1966) A comparative study of facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:293–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hylander WL, Johnson KR, Picq PG (1991) Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 86:1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ingervall B, Bitsanis E (1987) A pilot study of the effect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children. Eur J Orthod 9:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Janovic A, Saveljic I, Vukicevic A, Nikolic D, Rakocevic Z, Jovicic G (2015) Occlusal load distribution through the cortical and trabecular bone of the human mid-facial skeleton in natural dentition: a three-dimensional finite element study. Ann Anat Anat Anz 197:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieberman DE, Krovitz GE, Yates FW, Devlin M, Claire MS (2004) Effects of food processing on masticatory strain and craniofacial growth in a retrognathic face. J Hum Evol 46:655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pakdel AR, Whyne CM, Fialkov JA (2017) Structural biomechanics of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton under maximal masticatory loading: inferences and critical analysis based on a validated computational model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prado FB, Freire AR, Cláudia Rossi A, Ledogar JA, Smith AL, Dechow PC (2016) Review of in vivo bone strain studies and finite element models of the zygomatic complex in humans and nonhuman primates: implications for clinical research and practice. Anat Rec 299:1753–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sella-Tunis T, Pokhojaev A, Sarig R, O’Higgins P, May H (2018) Human mandibular shape is associated with masticatory muscle force. Sci Rep 8:6042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sicher H, Tandler J (1928) Anatomie für zahnärzte. J. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toro-Ibacache V, Zapata Muñoz V, O’Higgins P (2016) The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting. Ann Anat Anat Anz 203:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC (1992) A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 71:1279–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wachtler F, Jacob M (1986) Origin and development of the cranial skeletal muscles. Bibliotheca Anatomica 29:24–46

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weijs WA, Hillen B (1985) Cross-sectional areas and estimated intrinsic strength of the human jaw muscles. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 23:267–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff J (1986) The law of bone remodelling. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong A, Woods M, Stella D (2016) Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns. Aust Orthod J 32:2–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zink KD, Lieberman DE (2016) Impact of meat and lower Palaeolithic food processing techniques on chewing in humans. Nature 531:500–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA: project development, data collection, manuscript writing. JMF: manuscript writing. NG: data collection. KC: data collection. CC: project development. LG: project development, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Arnaud-Brachet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnaud-Brachet, M., Foletti, J.M., Graillon, N. et al. Could mastication modify the shape of the orbit? A scannographic study in humans. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 63–67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02315-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02315-7

Keywords

Navigation