Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of osteoporotic fractures following stroke in older persons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this study was to explore the increased risk of stroke survivors to different sustained osteoporotic fractures. We used hospital data and data on functional impairment. We found a higher risk in stroke survivors without functional impairment with the risk higher for lower than for upper extremity fractures.

Introduction

Stroke survivors are at high risk of osteoporotic fractures due to frequent falls and an increased risk to develop osteoporosis. Data on their relative risk to sustain other than hip fractures is limited. Furthermore, the role of severe functional impairment on their fracture risk has not been considered yet. The aim of this study was to determine the relative risk of stroke survivors to sustain different osteoporotic fractures with regard to the presence of severe functional impairment.

Methods

Data from 2004 to 2009 of more than 1.2 million individuals aged 65 years or older and insured at a large German health insurance company were used for the analyses. Incident stroke and fractures were obtained from hospital diagnoses. Analyses were stratified by gender and information on severe functional impairment. Persons without preceding incident stroke were used as the reference group. Multistate models were used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results

Stroke survivors had a higher risk for fractures. However, a strong effect modification by functional impairment was apparent. Stroke survivors with functional impairment had no significantly increased risk for any fractures site compared to the corresponding reference group with functional impairment. In contrast, stroke survivors without functional impairment had a clearly and significantly increased fracture risk for most fracture sites. In these persons, the relative fracture risk for fractures of the lower extremities was higher than for fractures of the upper extremities.

Conclusion

To evaluate the relative risk of stroke survivors for osteoporotic fractures, functional status appears to be a relevant parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons (2011) J. Am. Geriatr Soc. 59, 148–157

  2. Becker C, Blessing-Kapelke U (2011) Recommended guidelines for physical exercise to prevent falls in elderly people living at home. Z Für Gerontol Geriatr 44:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. CG21 Falls: NICE guideline. at <http://www.nice.org.uk/CG021NICEguideline>

  4. Deandrea S et al (2010) Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Camb Mass 21:658–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF (1988) Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 319:1701–1707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinlay S (2011) Changes in stroke epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 124:e494–e496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E (2002) Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP (1996) Complications after acute. Stroke 27:415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamb SE, Ferrucci L, Volapto S, Fried LP, Guralnik JM (2003) Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke the women’s health and aging study. Stroke 34:494–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jørgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK (2002) Higher incidence of falls in long-term stroke survivors than in population controls depressive symptoms predict falls after. Stroke 33:542–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown DL, Morgenstern LB, Majersik JJ, Kleerekoper M, Lisabeth LD (2008) Risk of fractures after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Switz 25:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitson HE et al (2006) Adding injury to insult: fracture risk after stroke in veterans. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1082–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu C-H, Liou T-H, Hsiao P-L, Lin Y-C, Chang K-H (2011) Contribution of ischemic stroke to hip fracture risk and the influence of gender difference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92:1987–1991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramnemark A, Nilsson M, Borssén B, Gustafson Y (2000) Stroke, a major and increasing risk factor for femoral neck fracture. Stroke J Cereb Circ 31:1572–1577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Borssén B, Olsson T, Gustafson Y (1998) Fractures after stroke. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 8:92–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dennis MS, Lo KM, McDowall M, West T (2002) Fractures after stroke: frequency, types, and associations. Stroke J Cereb Circ 33:728–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O (2001) Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalization for stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ 32:702–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pouwels S et al (2009) Risk of hip/femur fracture after stroke: a population-based case–control study. Stroke J Cereb Circ 40:3281–3285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Melton LJ 3rd, Brown RD Jr, Achenbach SJ, O’Fallon WM, Whisnant JP (2001) Long-term fracture risk following ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 12:980–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sennerby U et al (2009) Cardiovascular diseases and risk of hip fracture. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 302:1666–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jørgensen L, Jacobsen BK, Wilsgaard T, Magnus JH (2000) Walking after stroke: does it matter? Changes in bone mineral density within the first 12 months after stroke. A Longitudinal Study Osteoporos Int 11:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R, Olsson T, Gustafson Y (1999) Hemiosteoporosis after severe stroke, independent of changes in body composition and weight. Stroke 30:755–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benzinger P et al (2013) Pelvic fracture rates in community-living people with and without disability and in residents of nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. © Statistisches Bundesamt, W. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland - GENESIS-Online. (2014). at <https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online>

  25. Becker C, Leistner K, Nikolaus T (1998) Introducing a statutory insurance system for long-term care (Pflegeversicherung) in Germany. Michel JP Rubenstein LZ Vellas BJ Albarede JL Geriatr. Programs Dep. World Serdi-Springer Paris-N. Y. 55–64

  26. Van den Bussche H et al (2010) Inzidenz, Rezidiv. Pflegebedürftigkeit und Mortalität von Schlaganfall Aktuelle Neurol 37:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanis JA et al (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 12:417–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beyersmann J, Gastmeier P, Wolkewitz M, Schumacher M (2008) An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation. J Clin Epidemiol 61:1216–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Walraven C, Davis D, Forster AJ, Wells GA (2004) Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 57:672–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beyersmann J, Wolkewitz M, Allignol A, Grambauer N, Schumacher M (2011) Application of multistate models in hospital epidemiology: advances and challenges. Biom J 53:332–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cologne J et al (2012) Proportional hazards regression in epidemiologic follow-up studies: an intuitive consideration of primary time scale. Epidemiol Camb Mass 23:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lamarca R, Alonso J, Gómez G, Muñoz A (1998) Left-truncated data with age as time scale: an alternative for survival analysis in the elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53:M337–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R, Englund U, Gustafson Y (1999) Progressive hemiosteoporosis on the paretic side and increased bone mineral density in the nonparetic arm the first year after severe stroke. Osteoporos Int 9:269–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lampropoulos CE, Papaioannou I, D’Cruz DP (2012) Osteoporosis—a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:587–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Benzinger P et al (2014) Risk for femoral fractures in Parkinson’s disease patients with and without severe functional impairment. PLoS ONE 9:e97073

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rapp K et al (2012) Femoral fracture rates in people with and without disability. Age Ageing 41:653–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1993) Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc at <http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1994-18107-001>

  38. De Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, Fasotti L, van Limbeek J (2004) Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:886–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Berger K, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Heuschmann P, Keil U (2000) [Frequency of stroke in Germany: prevalence, incidence and sources of these data]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1946 125, 21–25

  40. Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19:1139–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Icks AIA, Arend WAW, Becker CBC, Rapp KRK, Haastert BHB (2013) Incidence of hip fractures in Germany, 1995–2010. Arch Osteoporos 8:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kliebsch U, Reiser K, Brenner H Reliabilitätsstudie zum Begutachtungsverfahren der Pflegebedürftigkeit im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung. Gesundheitswesen 59, 34–41

  43. Hyndman D, Ashburn A (2003) People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance. ADL Ability Falls Disabil Rehabil 25:817–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Einsiedel T et al (2006) Frakturen der oberen Extremität beim geriatrischen Patienten–Harmlose Monoverletzung oder Ende der Selbstständigkeit?: Eine prospektive Studie zum Outcome nach distaler Radius- und proximaler Humerusfraktur bei über 65-jährigen. Z Für Gerontol Geriatr 39:451–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Finnern HW, Sykes DP (2003) The hospital cost of vertebral fractures in the EU: estimates using national datasets. Osteoporos Int 14:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Quah C, Boulton C, Moran C (2011) The influence of socioeconomic status on the incidence, outcome and mortality of fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93-B:801–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gillespie LD et al (2012) Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Online 9, CD007146

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K (2005) Risedronate sodium therapy for prevention of hip fracture in men 65 years or older after stroke. Arch Intern Med 165:1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Batchelor F, Hill K, Mackintosh S, Said C (2010) What works in falls prevention after stroke. A Syst Rev Meta-Analysis Stroke 41:1715–1722

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Statement of human rights

Anonymised data were obtained by the insurance company. The insurants were not contacted personally for informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ulm University.

Funding

The analysis was supported by the “Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung” (01EC1007A).

Conflicts of interest

Petra Benzinger, Kilian Rapp, Hans-Helmut König, Florian Bleibler, Christoph Globas, Jan Beyersmann, Andrea Jaensch, Clemens Becker, and Gisela Büchele declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Benzinger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 35 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benzinger, P., Rapp, K., König, H.H. et al. Risk of osteoporotic fractures following stroke in older persons. Osteoporos Int 26, 1341–1349 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-3005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-3005-x

Keywords

Navigation