Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2018) 44:847–856 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5222-9
Because of a technical error, the code corresponding to the outcome for the Basir et al. cohort was mis-implemented in the original version of our article. Characteristics of the cohort are in fact the followings:
Observational studies | Inclusion period | Cause of cardiogenic shock | Single/multicenter | Number of patients (n) | Epinephrine-treated patients n (%) | Death n (%) | Mortality endpoint | ECLS (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basir et al., 2018 [1] | 2016 | Acute coronary syndrome | Single | 41 | 8 (18) | 10 (24) | In-hospital | Yes (27) |
Yet, this has a slight impact on the estimation of the association of epinephrine with the outcome for this cohort and subsequently to the entire cohort. More precisely, the ORs (with 95% confidence interval) have changed as depicted in the table below:
Original version | After erratum | |
|---|---|---|
Basir et al. [1] | 0.96 (0.16–5.73) | 1.04 (0.17–6.22) |
All studies | 3.33 (2.81–3.94) | 3.42 (2.89–4.05) |
Reference
Basir MB, Schreiber T, Dixon S, Alaswad K, Patel K, Almany S, Khandelwal A, Hanson I, George A, Ashbrook M, Blank N, Abdelsalam M, Sareen N, Timmis SBH, O’Neill WW (2018) Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the detroit cardiogenic shock initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 91(3):454–461
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Léopold, V., Gayat, E., Pirracchio, R. et al. Correction to: Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients. Intensive Care Med 44, 2022–2023 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5372-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5372-9