Literatur
Rammelt S, Grass R, Zwipp H (2008) Sprunggelenkfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 111:412–438
Heim D, Niederhauser K (2007) Die Drittelrohrhakenplatte. Oper Orthop Traumatol 3:305–309
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Mittlmeier T (2013) Therapie der Sprunggelenks-Luxationsfrakturen vom Pronationstyp. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25:273–293
Heim U, Pfeiffer KM (1988) Periphere Osteosynthesen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
Schaffer JJ, Manoli A 2nd (1987) The antiglide plate for distal fibular fixation. A biomechanical comparison with fixation with a lateral plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:596–604
Weber M, Krause F (2005) Peroneal tendon lesions caused by antiglide plates used for fixation of lateral malleolar fractures: the effect of plate and screw position. Foot Ankle Int 26:281–285
Rammelt S, Manke E (2018) Syndesmosenverletzungen. Unfallchirurg 121:693–703
Buckley R, Kwek E, Duffy P, Korley R, Puloski S, Buckley A, Martin R, Rydberg Moller E, Schneider P (2018) Single-screw fixation compared with double screw fixation for treatment of medial malleolar fractures: a prospective randomized trial. J Orthop Trauma 32(11):548–553
McConnell T, Tornetta P (2001) Marginal plafond impaction in association with supination-adduction ankle fractures: a report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma 15(6):447–449
Rammelt S, Heim D, Hofbauer LC, Grass R, Zwipp H (2011) Probleme und Kontroversen in der Behandlung von Sprunggelenkfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 114:847–860
Stromsoe K, Hoqevold HE, Skjeldal S, Alho A (1995) The repair of a ruptured deltoid ligament is not necessary in ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:920–921
Sun X, Li T, Sun Z, Li Y, Yang M, Li S, Lv Z, Jiang X, Yong W, Wu X, Wang M (2018) Does routinely repairing deltoid ligament injuries in type B ankle joint fractures influence long term outcomes? Injury 49(12):2312–2317
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M (2017) Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. Changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin 22:125–145
Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2010) Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1129–1135
Baumbach SF, Herterich V, Damblemont A, Hieber F, Böcker W, Polzer H (2019) Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment frequently restores syndesmotic stability. Injury 50:564–570
Heim D, Niederhauser K, Simbray N (2010) The Volkmann dogma: a retrospective, long-term, single-center study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 36:515–515
Ferries JS, DeCoster TA, Firoozbakhsh KK, Garcia JF, Miller RA (1994) Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size. J Orthop Trauma 8(4):328–331
Hoekstra H, Rosseels W, Rammelt S, Nijs S (2017) Direct fixation of fractures of the posterior pilon via a posteromedial approach. Injury 48:1269–1274
Rammelt S (2019) Malleolar fractures. In: Rammelt S, Swords M, Dhillon M, Sands A (Hrsg) AO manual of fracture management. Foot & ankle. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, S 115–130
Stoffel K, Wysocki D, Baddour E, Nicholls R, Yates P (2009) Comparison of two intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis. A cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(11):2646–2652
Kamin K, Notov D, Al-Sadi O, Kleber C, Rammelt S (2020) Standards, Tipps und Fallstricke in der Versorgung der Sprunggelenkfraktur. Unfallchirurg. (in press)
Stark E, Tornetta P, Creevy WR (2007) Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):643–646
Pelton K, Thordarson DB, Barnwell J (2010) Open versus closed treatment of the fibula in Maisonneuve injuries. Foot Ankle Int 31(7):604–608
Höcker K, Pachucki A (1989) Die Incisura fibularis tibiae. Die Stellung der Fibula in der distalen Syndesmose am Querschnitt. Unfallchirurg 92:401–406
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. An evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin 13:611–633
Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):788–792
Vasarhelyi A, Lubitz J, Gierer P, Gradl G, Rosler K, Hopfenmuller W, Klaue K, Mittlmeier TW (2006) Detection of fibular torsional deformities after surgery for ankle fractures with a novel CT method. Foot Ankle Int 27:1115–1121
Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S (1997) The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1809–1815
Heineck J, Serra A, Haupt C, Rammelt S (2009) Accuracy of corrective osteotomies in fibular malunion: a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int 30(8):773–777
Andersen MR, Frihagen F, Hellund JC, Madsen JE, Figved W (2018) Randomized trial comparing suture button with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(1):2–12
Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S (2015) A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma 29(5):216–223
Honeycutt MW, Riehl JT (2019) Effect of a dynamic fixation construct on syndesmosis reduction: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 33(9):460–446
DeGroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32:250–256
Dingemans SA, Rammelt S, White TO, Goslings JC, Schepers T (2016) Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? A systematic review. Bone Joint J 98-B:1497–1504
Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C et al (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:2–6
Chissell HR, Jones J (1995) The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type‑C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):435–438
Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:102–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
K. Kamin erhielt Vortragshonorare von AOTrauma Deutschland. D. Notov gibt an, dass kein finanzieller Interessenkonflikt besteht. C. Kleber: Vortragshonorar: AOTrauma Deutschland. – Patent: „CD8 T cell subsets (CD3+8 + 11a++28-57+ = CD8+ TEMRA, and CD4+8+ double positive T cells) as a risk marker for predicting delayed or incomplete fracture healing and as a therapeutic target to improve the outcome of bone fracture healing. CH 592“. O. Al-Sadi gibt an, dass kein finanzieller Interessenkonflikt besteht. S. Rammelt: Begutachtete Mittel für Grundlagenforschung durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). – Reisekosten von AO Trauma für Kurse und Arbeitsgruppensitzungen.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
Redaktion
P. Biberthaler, München
T. Gösling, Braunschweig
T. Mittlmeier, Rostock
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamin, K., Notov, D., Kleber, C. et al. Versorgung der Sprunggelenkfraktur: operative Technik. Unfallchirurg 123, 57–67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-00754-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-00754-w