Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of trendelenburg versus passive leg raising: Autotransfusion in humans

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A, The Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58:1072–1083

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor J, Weil MH (1967) Failure of the Trendelenburg position to improve circulation during clinical shock. J Am Coll Surg 124:1005–1010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reed JH Jr, Wood EH (1970) Effect of body position on vertical distribution of pulmonary blood flow. J Appl Physiol 28:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shenkin HA, Scheuerman WG, Spitz EB, Groff RA (1949) Effect of change of position upon the cerebral circulation of man. J Appl Physiol 2:317–326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terai, C., Anada, H., Matsushima, S. et al. Effects of trendelenburg versus passive leg raising: Autotransfusion in humans. Intensive Care Med 22, 613–614 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708113

Keywords

Navigation