Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zur Messbarkeit von Lebensqualität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lebensqualität in der Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff Lebensqualität bezeichnet den von den Patienten erlebten Gesundheitszustand in körperlicher, psychischer, sozialer, mentaler und funktionaler Hinsicht. Eine Erfassung der Lebensqualität in der Medizin ist sinnvoll, um die Effekte von Diagnose und Behandlung auch aus Sicht der Patientinnen und Patienten sichtbar zu machen. Als Indikator des Behandlungserfolgs ist die „gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität“ in der Medizin inzwischen akzeptiert. Aber auch in der Prävention und Rehabilitation sowie in der Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie gewinnt Lebensqualität an Bedeutung. Zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität existiert eine Reihe von psychometrisch geprüften, standardisierten Messinstrumenten (Fragebögen), die in der Epidemiologie, in der Therapieevaluation, der Gesundheitsökonomie und in der Qualitätssicherung eingesetzt werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Lebensqualitätsforschung unter konzeptuellen, methodischen und anwendungsbezogenen Gesichtspunkten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Modular Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Oncology: An Update. In: Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed S, Berzon R a, Revicki D a, et al. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Med. Care. 2012;50(12):1060–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Leplège AP Wilkin D (1996) International Use and Application of Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments. In: Spilker B. (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lipincott- Raven, Philadelphia, S 613–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure. Medical Care 19:780–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A, (1991) Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1991) Quality of Life – Definition, Conceptualization and Implications: A Methodologists View. Theoretical Surgery 6:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1997) Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität und Subjektive Gesundheit. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie 47:76–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (2014) Das Konzept der Lebensqualität in der Medizin – Entwicklung und heutiger Stellenwert. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität 108(2–3):97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Ravens-Sieberer U (1995a) Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungsgebiete der Lebensqualitätsforschung bei Kindern. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 44:391–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Ravens-Sieberer U (1995b) Health-related Quality of Life Assessment in Children. A Review of the Literature. European Review of Applied Psychology 45:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Quitmann J (2014) Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 16(2):137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, von Steinbüchel N (1993) Der Fragebogen Alltagsleben – Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie 2:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Kirchberger I & Ware J (1995) Der deutsche SF –36 Health Survey. Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instrumentes zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften 1:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK, Cella DF, Anderson RT (1996). Creating and Evaluating Cross-Cultural Instruments. In Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Brütt A L, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U, Bella Study Group (2008) Psychometric properties of the KINDL-R questionnaire: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17 Suppl 1:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M, Quitmann J, Power M, Herdman M, Mimoun E, Debusk K, Feigerlova E, Lunde C, Dellenmark-Blom M, Sanz D, Rohenkohl A, Pleil A, Wollmann H, Chaplin JE (2013) Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cella DF, Bonomi AE (1996) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) Quality of Life Measurement System. In: Spliker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N (2007), et al The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med. Care 45(5 Suppl 1):3–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, Fullerton S, Aaronson N (2002) Patient-reported outcomes: The example of health-related quality of life – a European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in the drug regulatory process. Drug Inf J 36 (Suppl 1):209–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The DISABKIDS Group Europe (2006). The DISABKIDS Questionnaires – Quality of life questionnaires for children with chronic conditions. Handbook. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ (1996) Health Utilities Index. In: Spliker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt GH, Feeney DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life. Annals of Internal Medicine 118:622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D (1993) Psychometric Considerations in Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Measures. Quality of Life Research 2:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ –5D (EQ –5D –5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herschbach P (1999) Editorial: Das Konzept „Lebensqualität“ verändert die Medizin. Der subjektiven Wahrnehmung des Patienten Respekt zollen. Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift 141:697

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerny C, Bernhard J, Joss R, Willems Y, Cavalli F, Kiser J, Brunner K, Favre S, Alberto P, Glaus A et al (1992) Feasibility of Quality of Life Assessment in a Randomized Phase III Trial of Small Cell Lung Cancer – A Lesson from the Real World – The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK. Ann Oncol. 3:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP, Williams J, Papp E (1981) The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective Health Status and Medical Consultations. Social Science in Medicine, 15A:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Thorlund K, Busse JW, da Costa BR, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH (2013) Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses – part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11(1):211 [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CR, (1995) Use, Misuse and Abuse of Questionnaires on Quality of Life. Patient Education and Counseling 26:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CR, Hickey A, McGee HM, O’Boyle CA (2003) A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL. Qual Life Res 12(3):275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch U, Mehnert A, Strauss B: [Psychological interventions in patients with chronic physical diseases and psychological comorbidity]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2011 54:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasuska M, Riva S et al (2012) Linking quality-of-life measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth Version in chronic health conditions: the example of young people with hemophilia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91(13 Suppl 1): S 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine RJ (1996) Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials: An Ethical Perspective. In: Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 489–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig M, (1991) Implizite Therapiebildung in der Lebensqualität. In: Bullinger M, Ludwig M, von Steinbüchel N (Hrsg) Lebensqualität bei kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen. Hogrefe, Stuttgart, S 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M (2013). Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value Health 16(4):461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell I, Newell C, (Hrsg) (1987) Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Najman JM, Levine S (1981) Evaluating the Impact of Medical Care and Technology on Quality of Life: A Review and Critique. Social Science in Medicine 15F:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Richard AD (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 27(3 Suppl):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Erickson P (1992) Health Status and Health Policy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Bettge S, Erhart M (2003) Lebensqualität von Kindern und Jugendlichen – Ergebnisse aus der Pilotphase des Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurveys. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 46:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Duer W et al. (2005a) The KIDSCREEN –52 Quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Development and first results from a European survey. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research, 5:353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruof J, Knoerzer D, Dünne A, Dintsios C, Staab T, Schwartz FW (2014) Analysis of endpoints used in marketing authorisations versus value assessments of oncology medicines in Germany. Health Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CL (1996) Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd ed.) Lippincott- Raven, Philadelphia, S 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S, Bullinger M (2007) Cross-cultural quality of life assessment approaches and experiences from the health care field In: Ian Gough, JAM (Hrsg) Wellbeing in Developing Countries. From Theory to Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, S 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöffski O, v.d. Schulenburg JM (Hrsg) (2000) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation. 2. Aufl. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PC, Street AD (2013) On the uses of routine patient-reported health outcome data. Health Econ 22(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilker B (1996) Introduction to the Field of Quality of Life Trials. In: Spilker B (Hrsg), Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott- Raven, Philadelphia, S 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, S. (The WHOQOL-Group) (1996). The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Assessment Instrument. In: Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S. 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • The European QoLISSY Study Group (2013) The QoLISSY Questionnaire – User Manual. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Lane MM (2005) Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, Uzark K, Szer IS (2002) The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making. J Behav Med 25(2):175–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Mackensen S, Bullinger M, the Haemo-QoL Group (2004) Development and testing of an instrument to assess the Quality of Life of Children with Haemophilia in Europe (Haemo-QoL). Haemophilia 10(Suppl 1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Steinbüchel N, Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1999) Die Münchner Lebensqualitäts-Dimensionen Liste (MLDL). Entwicklung und Prüfung eines Verfahrens zur krankheitsübergreifenden Erfassung der Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie 3: 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE (1987) Standards for Validating Health Measures. Definition and Content. Journal of Chronic Disease 40:503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS –36 Item Short-Report Health Survey (SF –36).I Conceptual Framework and Item selection. Medical Care 30:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettergren L, Kettis-Lindblad A, Sprangers M, Ring L (2009) The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Qual Life Res 18(6):737–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hamburg, Deutschland

    Monika Bullinger

Authors
  1. Monika Bullinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Bullinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    László Kovács

  2. Universität Tübingen , Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Roland Kipke

  3. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Ralf Lutz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bullinger, M. (2016). Zur Messbarkeit von Lebensqualität. In: Kovács, L., Kipke, R., Lutz, R. (eds) Lebensqualität in der Medizin. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10679-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10679-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10678-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10679-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation