Skip to main content

Intrapartum Risk Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Injury

Summary

Maternal weight, estimated fetal weight, fundal height, abnormal labor patterns, and need for operative delivery identify a group of women at great risk for shoulder dystocia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Phelan J, Strong T. Shoulder dystocia. Female Patient 1988;13:73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brost B, Calhoun B, Misko C. Evaluation of clinical risk factors for delivering a macrosomic infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;S121:#209.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyachenko A, Ciampi A, Fahey J, Mighty H, Oppenheimier L, Hamilton E. Prediction of risk for shoulder dystocia with neonatal injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1544–1549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehta S, Blackwell S, Hendler R, et al. Accuracy of estimated fetal weight in shoulder dystocia and neonatal birth injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1877–1881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedetti T, Gabbe S. Shoulder dystocia: A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:526–531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruikshank D, White C. Obstetric malpresentations: Twenty years’ experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;116:1097–1104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Golditch I, Kirkman K. The large fetus: Management and outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:26–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Modanlou H, Dorchester W, Thorosian A, Freeman R. Macrosomia—maternal, fetal, and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:420–424.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sack R. The large infant: A study of maternal, obstetric, fetal, and newborn characteristics including a long-term pediatric follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969;104:195–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dignam W. Abnormal delivery. Schaefer G, Graber E, eds. Complications in Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgery. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row; 1981:18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Acker D, Sach B, Friedman E. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia in the average-weight infant. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:614–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dignam W. Difficulties in delivery, including shoulder dystocia and malpresentation of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1976;19:3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gross T, Sokol R, Williams T, et al. Shoulder dystocia: A fetal physician risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris B. Shoulder dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;27:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor T, Cavanaugh D, Knuppel R, eds. Obstetric Emergencies. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1982:243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dor N, Mosherg H, Stern W, Iagami N, Schulman H. Complication in fetal Macrosomia. J Med 1984;84:302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seeds J. Malpresentations. In: Gabbe S, Niebyl Jr, Simpson J, eds. Obstetrics, Normal and Problem Pregnancies. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1986:453.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smeltzer J. Prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986;29:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopwood H. Shoulder dystocia: Fifteen years’ experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:162–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Modanlou H, Komatsu G, Dorchester W, et al. Large for gestational age neonates: Anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:417–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Apuzzio J, Ventzileos A, Iffy L. Operative Obstetrics. Third ed. London & New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bahar A. Risk factors and fetal outcomes in cases of shoulder dystocia. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996;103:868–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bofill J, Rust D, Deiedas M. Shoulder Dystocia and operative vaginal delivery. J Mat Fetal Med 1997;6:220–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seigworth G. Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1966;28:767–771.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hibbard L. Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34:424–429.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McCall J Jr. Shoulder dystocia. A study of after effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962;83:1486–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coustan D, Imarah J. Prophylactic insulin treatment of gestational diabetes reduces the incidence of macrosomia, operative delivery, and birth trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:836–842.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonik B, Stringer C, Held B. An alternative maneuver for management of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:882–888.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Elliott J, Garite T, Freeman R, et al. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:159–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogata E, Sabbagha R, Metzger B, et al. Serial ultrasonography to assess evolving fetal macrosomia. JAMA 1989;243:2405–2409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McLeod A. Editorial comment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:164.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Borell U, Fernstrom I. Radiographic studies of the rotation of the foetal shoulders during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1958;37:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen S, Aisaka K, Mori H, Kigawa T. Effects of sitting position on uterine activity in labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:67–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chestnut D, Bates J, Choi W. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia with lidocaine: Efficacy and influence during the 2nd stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:323–327.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen W. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:266–269.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hellman L, Prystowsky H. The duration of the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952;63:1223–1233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Katz M, Lunenfeld E, Meizner I, Bashan N, Gross J. The effect of the duration of second state of labor on the acid base state of the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:425–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Svigos J. The macrosomic infant: A high risk complication. Med J Aust 1981;1:245–249.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Brien J, Usher R, Maughan G. Causes of birth asphyxia and trauma. Can Med Assoc J 1966;94:1077–1081.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

James A. O'Leary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Leary, J.A. (2009). Intrapartum Risk Factors. In: O'Leary, J. (eds) Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Injury. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-473-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-473-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-28-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-473-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics