Abstract
Background
In laparoscopy, 50% of all complications occur during establishment of the pneumoperitoneum. Elevation of the fascia is recommended for the Veress needle approach, although the benefit has not been proved to date. This study aimed to evaluate the intraabdominal changes during lifting of the fascia with regard to the distance from the fascia to the retroperitoneal vessels and the intestine for access in laparoscopy.
Methods
For 10 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the operation started with the computed tomography (CT) scan. After orotracheal intubation, a CT scan of the umbilical region was performed. After a supraumbilical incision, the fascia was freed and elevated with stay sutures. During maximal elevation, a second CT scan was performed. Distances to the intestinal (small bowel) and retroperitoneal structures (iliac artery, vena cava) were measured. Intraabdominal pressure was measured with a transcystic balloon manometer before (a) and after (b) elevation of the fascia, after insertion of the Veress needle (c), and after completion of the insufflations (d).
Results
Lifting of the fascia increased the distance between the fascia and the intestinal structures in the patients with no prior abdominal surgery (mean distance, 1.92 cm; range, 0.87–2.67 cm) and the distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal vessels (mean distance, 7.83 cm; range, 3–11 cm). The median intraabdominal pressures in terms of cm H2O were 5.4 for a, 1.1 for b, 1.1 for c, and 12. 5 for d.
Conclusion
Elevation of the fascia before the first entrance to the abdominal cavity for laparoscopy may increase safety due to a significant enlargement of distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110(6):886–887
Orlando R, Palatini P, Lirussi F (2003) Needle and trocar injuries in diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia: what is the true incidence of these complications? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(3):181–184
Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21(5):529–533
Ballem RV, Rudomanski J (1993) Techniques of pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(1):42–43
Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, Barkun JS (1993) Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):296–299
Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 15(6):566–569
Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2002) Access-related complications in laparoscopic surgery. Tips and tricks to avoid trocar complications. Chirurg 73(8):863–876, quiz 877–879
Semm K (1995) Cutting versus conical tip designs. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(1):39–47
Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonier HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Janson FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(7):1121–1143
Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90(6):668–679
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shamiyeh, A., Glaser, K., Kratochwill, H. et al. Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures. Surg Endosc 23, 313–317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9920-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9920-1