Skip to main content
Log in

Should laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair be abandoned in favor of the open approach?

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The most appropriate approach to the repair of large paraesophageal hernias remains controversial. Despite early results of excellent outcomes after laparoscopic repair, recent reports of high recurrence require that this approach be reevaluated.

Methods

For this study, 60 primary paraesophageal hernias consecutively repaired at one institution from 1990 to 2002 were reviewed. These 25 open transabdominal and 35 laparoscopic repairs were compared for operative, short-, and long-term outcomes on the basis of quality-of -life questionnaires and radiographs.

Results

No difference in patient characteristics was detected. Laparoscopic repair resulted in lower blood loss, fewer intraoperative complications, and a shorter length of hospital stay. No difference in general or disease-specific quality-of-life was documented. Radiographic follow-up was available for 78% open and 91% laparoscopic repairs, showing anatomic recurrence rates of 44% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.11).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic repair should remain in the forefront for the management of paraesophageal hernias. However, there is considerable room for improvement in reducing the incidence of recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JJ Andujar PK Papasavas T Birdas J Robke Y Raftopoulos DJ Gagne PF Caushaj RJ Landreneau RJ Keenan (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation Surg Endosc 18 444–447 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3gtlCjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14752653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MA Carlson RE Condon KA Ludwig WJ Schulte (1998) ArticleTitleManagement of intrathoracic stomach with polypropylene mesh prosthesis reinforced transabdominal hiatus hernia repair J Am Coll Surg 187 227–230 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00162-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhtVyqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9740178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. PA Clavien JR Sanabria SM Strasberg (1992) ArticleTitleProposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy Surgery 111 518–526 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B1crotlY%3D Occurrence Handle1598671

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MB Edye J Canin-Endres F Gattorno BA Salky (1998) ArticleTitleDurability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia Ann Surg 228 528–535 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199810000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FgsFSjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9790342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. FH Ellis SuffixJr (2002) Open Nissen fundoplication FG Pearson JD Cooper J Deslauriers RJ Ginsberg C Hiebert GA Patterson H Urschel (Eds) Esophageal surgery EditionNumber2 Churchill Livingstone Philadelphia 319–325

    Google Scholar 

  6. AS Geha MG Massad NJ Snow AE Baue (2000) ArticleTitleA 32-year experience in 100 patients with giant paraesophageal hernia: the case for abdominal approach and selective antireflux repair Surgery 128 623–630 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2000.108425 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fhsl2nug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11015096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M Hashemi JH Peters TR DeMeester JE Huprichi M Quek JA Hagen PF Crookes J Theisen SR DeMeester LF Sillin CG Bremner (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow-up reveals high recurrence rate J Am Coll Surg 190 553–560 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00260-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lvV2lsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10801022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. BA Jobe RW Aye CW Deveney JS Domreis LD Hill (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus: objective follow-up at three years J Gastrointest Surg 6 181–188 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00067-1 Occurrence Handle11992803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L Khaitan H Houston K Sharp M Holzman W Richards (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate Am Surg 68 546–551 Occurrence Handle12079137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SG Mattar SP Bowers KD Galloway JG Hunter CD Smith (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia Surg Endosc 16 745–749 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8194-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383lvVajuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11997814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DE Maziak TR Todd FG Pearson (1998) ArticleTitleMassive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115 53–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ht1yktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9451045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. AF Pierre JD Luketich HC Fernando NA Christie PO Buenaventura VR Litle PR Schauer (2002) ArticleTitleResults of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: 200 consecutive patients Ann Thorac Surg 74 1909–1915 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04088-2 Occurrence Handle12643372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. JD Richardson GM Larson HC Polk SuffixJr (1982) ArticleTitleIntrathoracic fundoplication for shortened esophagus: treacherous solution to a challenging problem Am J Surg 143 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. PR Schauer S Ikramuddin RH McLaughlin TO Graham A Slivka KK Lee WH Schraut JD Luketich (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia Am J Surg 176 659–665 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00272-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7itl2quw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9926809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DB Skinner RH Belsey (1967) ArticleTitleSurgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia: long-term results with 1,030 patients J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53 33–54 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCiD2MjotlQ%3D Occurrence Handle5333620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. N Stylopoulos GS Gazelle DW Rattner (2002) ArticleTitleParaesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236 492–500 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012 Occurrence Handle12368678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LL Swanstrom BA Jobe LR Kinzie KD Horvath (1999) ArticleTitleEsophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication Am J Surg 177 359–363 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ptF2qsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10365869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M Terry CD Smith GD Branum K Galloway JP Waring JG Hunter (2001) ArticleTitleOutcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and paraesophageal hernia Surg Endosc 15 691–699 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080144 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksV2ksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11591970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. V Velanovich R Karmy-Jones (2001) ArticleTitleSurgical management of paraesophageal hernias: outcome and quality-of-life analysis Dig Surg 18 432–437 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000050189 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fnt1Cgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11799291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. V Velanovich SR Vallance JR Gusz FV Tapia MA Harkabus (1996) ArticleTitleQuality-of-life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease J Am Coll Surg 183 217–224 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2sfnsFU%3D Occurrence Handle8784314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JS Wu DL Dunnegan NJ Soper (1999) ArticleTitleClinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair Surg Endosc 13 497–502 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901021 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksVOmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10227951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Fried.

Additional information

Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Tyco Healthcare Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferri, L.E., Feldman, L.S., Stanbridge, D. et al. Should laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair be abandoned in favor of the open approach?. Surg Endosc 19, 4–8 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8903-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8903-0

Keywords

Navigation