Steve Walker
ABSTRACT
This paper takes as its starting point Kyng's (2010) challenges for future participatory design practices in the context of a technology landscape which has changed enormously since the emergence of both 'Scandinavian' PD and the participatory politics of 1960s US radicalism. We describe the Infinite Bandwidth, Zero Latency (IBZL)) project, from its use of the 'Imagine' workshop method to envisage potential technological futures, through to its involvement of stakeholder representatives and potential users in assessing one such vision of potential technological 'futures', the 'real avatar". IBZL was originally conceived as an intervention in policy debates in the UK about the significance and potential of 'next generation' or 'superfast' broadband networks, and as a way of mobilizing wider audiences to consider the possibility of innovative applications of them. By their very nature, the significance of these networks transcends particular workplaces. This case study describes responses to several of the challenges for PD practice raised by Kyng, including the roles of companies, intellectual property, funding, the involvement of social actors as users, the engagement of users in multiple roles.
- Agar, J., Green, S. & Harvey, P. (2002) Cotton to computers: From industrial to information revolutions. in Woolgar, S. (Ed.) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Andersen, D. F. and G. P. Richardson (1997). "Scripts for group model building: System Dynamics Review 13(2): 107--129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arnstein, S. J. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bell, S. and S. Morse (2009). Participatory Visioning of Indicator Use. International Sustainable Development Research Conference, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Bell, S. and S. Morse (2010). "Rich Pictures: A means to explore the 'Sustainable Mind'?" Sustainable Development Wiley Online.Google Scholar
- Bell, S. and S. Morse (2010). "Triple Task Method: Systemic, reflective action research." Systemic Practice and Action Research 23(6): 443--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bell, S. and S. Morse (2011). "Being, Engaging, Contextualising and Managing: BECM Matrix -- a means to assess group dynamics?" Systems Research and Behavioural Science 28(4): 319--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bell, S. and S. Walker (2010). "Futurescaping Infinite Bandwidth, Zero Latency." Futures 43: 525--539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Björgvinnson, E., Ehn, P. & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010) Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". PDC'10. Sydney, Australia, ACM Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S. (2009) Past Experiences and Recent Challenges in Participatory Design Research in Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol II, Oxford, Blackwell. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cave, M. & Martin, I. (2010) Motives and means for public investment in nationwide next generation networks. Telecommunications Policy, 34, 505--512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cawley, A. & Preston, P. (2007) Broadband and digital 'content' in the EU-25: Recent trends and challenges. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 259--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Checkland, P. B. and J. Scholes (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, Wiley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cleaver, F. (1999). "Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development" Journal of International Development 11(4): 597--612.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cybermoor Services Ltd (2011) Real Rural Avatars: Final Report, Technology Strategy Board Application No. 51589Google Scholar
- David, M. (2002). "Problems of Participation: the limits of action research." International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(1): 11--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dearden, A., Walker, S. & Watts, L. (2005) Choosing friends carefully: allies for critical computing. Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing,. Aarhus, Denmark, ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eisle, P. (2003). "Groups, group members and individual decision processes: The effects of decision strategy, social interaction style and reception of decision-threatening information on post-decision processes." Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 44(5): 467--477.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fathulla, K. (2008). "Understanding Diagrams: a pointer to the development of diagramming software." Visible Language 42(3): 265--284.Google Scholar
- Gershenfeld, N., Krikorian, R. & Cohen, D. (2004) The Internet of Things. Scientific American, 291, 76--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iivari, N. (2009) "Constructing the users" in open source software development: an interpretive case study of user participation. Information Technology & People, 22, 132--156.Google Scholar
- Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Karasti, H. (2010) Taking PD to Multiple Contexts: A reply to Kyng. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 85--92.Google Scholar
- Kling, R. & Iacano, C. S. (1988) The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements. The Sociology of Science and Technology, 35, 226--243.Google Scholar
- Knutsen, J., Martinussen, E. S., Arnall, T. & Morrison, A. (2011) Investigating an "Internet of Hybrid Products": Assembling Products, Interactions, Services, and Networks through Design. Computers and Composition, 28, 195--204.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kyng, M. (2010a) Bridging the Gap Between Politics and Techniques: On the next practices of participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 49--68Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1947). "Frontiers in Group Dynamics." Human Relations 1: 5--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, P. J. (1992). "Rich picture building in the soft systems methodology." European Journal of Information Systems 1(5): 351--360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martinez Lucio, M. & Walker, S. (2005) The Networked Union? The Internet as a Challenge to Trade Union Identity and Roles. Critical Perspectives on International Management, 1 (2/3), 137--154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martinez Lucio, M., Walker, S. & Trevorrow, P. (2009) Making Networks and (Re)Making Trade Union Bureaucracy: a European-wide case study of trade union engagement with the Internet and Networking New Technology, Work and Employment, 24, 115--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohan, G. (2001) Participatory development. in Desai, V. & Potter, R. (Eds.) The Arnold companion to development studies. London, Hodder.Google Scholar
- Prell, C., K. Hubacek, M. Reed, C. Quinn, N. Jin, J. Holden, T. Burt, M. Kirby and J. Sendzimir (2007). If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: traditional versus participatory model building. 32: 263--282.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, J. L. (2011) Free, Open Source Software Advocacy as a Social Justice Movement: The Expansion of F/OSS Movement Discourse in the 21st Century. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8, 223--239.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sutrisna, M. and P. Barrett (2007). "Applying rich picture diagrams to model case studies of construction projects." Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 14(2): 164.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Imagine real avatars and flying shepherds: involvement and engagement in innovative ICT
Recommendations
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging TimesWe consider open government (OG) within the context of e-government and its broader implications for the future of public administration. We argue that the current US Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs traditional distinctions between e-...
Understanding e-government (G2C) in the knowledge society
Governments are investing heavily both politically and financially in the knowledge society as a route to economic growth and international competitiveness. Web technology provides an efficient, cost-effective platform for national knowledge management, ...
Public Participation Readiness Toward E-Gov 2.0: Lessons from Two Countries
ICEGOV '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceNowadays, many government has programs to build inclusion and equality in the community where each individual is empowered and given equal opportunities to participate in both social and political processes. Equality in the community is a cultural ...
Comments