Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Longitudinal Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance of Sense of Coherence and General Self-Efficacy in Adolescence

Published Online:November 30, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000294

Abstract

Abstract. Sense of coherence (SOC) and General Self-efficacy (GSE) are trait-like self-regulatory attributes, supposedly benefitting health. Previous data on their factorial validity and longitudinal stability in adolescent samples have been inconclusive. The present study examined the factor structure, measurement invariance (MI), and stability coefficients of SOC and GSE among German adolescents in a longitudinal design over the course of nine years from age 15 to age 24. Results supported the factorial validity of both scales. GSE parameters were invariant up to the level of strict invariance, whereas for SOC partial scalar and strict invariance were attainable after modifications. Here we document reliability, validity, and factor mean changes of the SOC and GSE scales from adolescence to young adulthood. Interindividual differences in SOC were moderately stable. Though this implies limited sensitivity to intraindividual developmental changes, it qualifies SOC for long-term predictions. GSE was conspicuously less stable, raising questions about its long-term criterion validity.

References

  • Abel, T., Kohlmann, T. & Noack, H. (1995). Eine deutsche Übersetzung des SOC [A German translation of the SOC]. Bern, Switzerland: Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andersson, L. M. C., Moore, C. D., Hensing, G., Krantz, G. & Staland-Nyman, C. (2014). General self-efficacy and its relationship to self-reported mental illness and barriers to care: A general population study. Community Mental Health Journal, 50, 712–728. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9722-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 725–733. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1998). The sense of coherence: An historical and future perspective. In H. I. McCubbinE. A. ThompsonA. I. ThompsonJ. E. FromerEds., Stress, coping, and health in families: Sense of coherence and resiliency (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L. & Young, M. (1995). Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 394–406. doi: 10.1177/0013164495055003003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (1st print. ed.). New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J. & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018. doi: 10.1037/a0013193 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M. & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. doi: 10.1177/109442810141004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ciarrochi, J., Said, T. & Deane, F. P. (2005). When simplifying life is not so bad: the link between rigidity, stressful life events, and mental health in an undergraduate population. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33, 185–197. doi: 10.1080/03069880500132540 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egger, J. W. (2011). Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung – ein bedeutsames kognitives Konstrukt für gesundheitliches Verhalten [Self-efficacy: An important cognitive construct for health behavior]. Psychologische Medizin, 22, 43–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksson, M. & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 460–466. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018085 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eriksson, M. & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 376–381. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.041616 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fan, X. & Sivo, S. A. (2009). Using Δ goodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 54–69. doi: 10.1080/10705510802561311 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U. & Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 239–257. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00094-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U. & Ruoppila, I. (2003). The stability of sense of coherence: Comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1151–1165. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00325-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldt, T., Lintula, H., Suominen, S., Koskenvuo, M., Vahtera, J. & Kivimäki, M. (2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 16, 483–493. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9130-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frenz, A. W., Carey, M. P. & Jorgensen, R. S. (1993). Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 145–153. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.145 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gana, K. & Garnier, S. (2001). Latent structure of the sense of coherence scale in a french sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1079–1090. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00205-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geyer, S. (1997). Some conceptual considerations on the sense of coherence. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1771–1779. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00286-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grevenstein, D., Bluemke, M. & Kroeninger-Jungaberle, H. (2015). Incremental validity of sense of coherence, neuroticism, extraversion, and general self-efficacy: Longitudinal prediction of substance use frequency and mental health, Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hagquist, C. & Andrich, D. (2004). Is the Sense of Coherence-instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Rasch-modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 955–968. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00164-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haukkala, A., Konttinen, H., Lehto, E., Uutela, A., Kawachi, I. & Laatikainen, T. (2013). Sense of coherence, depressive Symptoms, cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75, 429–435. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31828c3fa4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hinz, A., Schumacher, J., Albani, C., Schmid, G. & Brähler, E. (2006). Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung [Standardization of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the German population]. Diagnostica, 52, 26–32. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.52.1.26 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lubke, G. H. & Dolan, C. V. (2003). Can unequal residual variance across groups mask differences in residual means in the common factor model? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 175–192. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hittner, J. B. (2007). Factorial invariance of the 13-item sense of coherence scale across gender. Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 273–280. doi: 10.1177/1359105307074256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holmberg, S., Thelin, A. & Stiernström, E. (2004). Relationship of sense of coherence to other psychosocial indices. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 227–236. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.227 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Honkinen, P., Aromaa, M., Suominen, S., Rautava, P., Sourander, A., Helenius, H. & Sillanpää, M. (2009). Early childhood psychological problems predict a poor sense of coherence in adolescents: A 15-year follow-up study. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 587–600. doi: 10.1177/1359105309103578 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Honkinen, P., Suominen, S., Helenius, H., Aromaa, M., Rautava, P., Sourander, A. & Sillanpää, M. (2008). Stability of the sense of coherence in adolescence. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20, 85–91. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.1.85 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B. & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80–89. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: Common, time‐specific, item‐specific, and residual‐error components of variance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 116–145. doi: 10.1080/10705519409539968 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miyoshi, A. (2012). The stability and causal effects of task‐specific and generalized self‐efficacy in college. Japanese Psychological Research, 54, 150–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00481.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moksnes, U. K., Espnes, G. A. & Haugan, G. (2013). Stress, sense of coherence and emotional symptoms in adolescents. Psychology & Health, 29, 32–49. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.822868 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nilsson, K. W., Leppert, J., Simonsson, B. & Starrin, B. (2010). Sense of coherence and psychological well-being: Improvement with age. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 347–352. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081174 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peter, C., Cieza, A. & Geyh, S. (2014). Rasch analysis of the general self-efficacy scale in spinal cord injury. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 544–555. doi: 10.1177/1359105313475897 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Posadzki, P., Stockl, A., Musonda, P. & Tsouroufli, M. (2010). A mixed-method approach to sense of coherence, health behaviors, self-efficacy and optimism: Towards the operationalization of positive health attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 246–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00764.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi: 10.2307/271063 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richardson, C. G., Ratner, P. A. & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). A test of the age-based measurement invariance and temporal stability of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 679–696. doi: 10.1177/0013164406292089 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rivera, F., García-Moya, I., Moreno, C. & Ramos, P. (2013). Developmental contexts and sense of coherence in adolescence: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 800–812. doi: 10.1177/1359105312455077 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R. & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saris, W. E., Satorra, A. & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582. doi: 10.1080/10705510903203433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. HeijmansD. S. G. PollockA. SatorraEds., Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). London, UK: Kluwer Academic. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y. & Kern, M. J. (2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 1047–1063. doi: 10.1177/0013164406288171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, N. & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210–222. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S. & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.18.3.242 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schumacher, J., Gunzelmann, T. & Brähler, E. (2000). Deutsche Normierung der Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky [Standardization of Antonovsky’s Sence of Coherence Scale in the German population]. Diagnostica, 46, 208–213. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.46.4.208 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. WeinmanS. WrightM. JohnstonEds., Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen des Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Scales for the assessment of teacher and student charecteristics]. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. doi: 10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stein, J. A., Lee, J. W. & Jones, P. S. (2006). Assessing cross-cultural differences through use of multiple-group invariance analyses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 249–258. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_05 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology, 9, 1–12. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000049 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tipton, R. M. & Worthington, E. L. (1984). The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: A study of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 545–548. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4805_14 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Togari, T., Yamazaki, Y., Takayama, T. S., Yamaki, C. K. & Nakayama, K. (2008). Follow-up study on the effects of sense of coherence on well-being after two years in Japanese university undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1335–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zimprich, D., Allemand, M. & Hornung, R. (2006). Measurement invariance of the abridged sense of coherence scale in adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 280–287. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.280 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Zirke, N., Schmid, G., Mazurek, B., Klapp, B. F. & Rauchfuss, M. (2007). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence in psychosomatic patients: A contribution to construct validation. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 4, 1–9. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar