Skip to main content

Models and Tools for the Computational Support of Technology Impact Assessments, Applied in the Context of Mass Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming European Data Protection Law

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((ISDP,volume 20))

  • 3695 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the conceptual and practical developments for a software prototype created in the course of the SIAM FP7 project (EC reference 261826). The term assessment support system was coined to characterise this system because its inherent aim is to provide insight about the assessment process itself and so enhance, rather than replace, traditional decision support approaches. An assessment support system follows a participative, human-driven approach and takes as input the specification of technology acquisition scenarios in order to record, analyse, and report on the entirety of individual assessments, made by different actors and stakeholders involved. The focus of such a system is to guide the assessment process and improve the reflexivity of information, opinions, and expertise among the contributors and decision-makers in the assessment of technology impact. This is achieved by making salient the issues which have been assessed (and also those which have been ignored); whether certain actors have been left out of the process and should be included; where there is agreement or conflict between actors; and whether the collective assessments made are balanced in terms of the different interests and responsibilities of all actors involved. This is a novel approach and in stark contrast to most existing decision support systems which focus on computing key performance indicators to suggest particular solutions which embody the best trade-off between assessment criteria, but which may not necessarily present the best solution to choose in terms of other types of impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    E.g., European Regulation on common rules in the field of civil aviation security, EC 300/2008.

  2. 2.

    “Cost Explosion: Price Tag for New Berlin Airport Keeps Rising”, accessed March 5, 2014, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/5-billion-euros-costs-increase-again-for-berlin-brandenburg-airport-a-928989.html.

  3. 3.

    “The curious case of Berlin’s Brandenburg Airport: Will it ever open?”, accessed March 5, 2014, http://www.newstatesman.com/business/2013/09/curious-case-berlins-brandenburg-airport.

  4. 4.

    “German defense minister to face grilling over Euro Hawk debacle”, accessed March 5, 2014, http://www.dw.de/german-defense-minister-to-face-grilling-over-euro-hawk-debacle/a-16964646.

  5. 5.

    European Commission – CORDIS – Projects – SIAM, accessed March 4, 2014, http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/rcn/97990_en.html.

  6. 6.

    George Marakas, Decision support systems in the twenty-first century, (Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1999).

  7. 7.

    Leon Hempel et al., “Innovation Journey Report”, SIAM deliverable D2.4, (European Commission, 2011).

  8. 8.

    Andrew van de Ven et al., The Innovation Journey, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).

  9. 9.

    For the definitions of the phases, please refer to Hempel et al., “Innovation Journey Report”, 7–8.

  10. 10.

    European Commission – CORDIS – Projects – SIAM.

  11. 11.

    Jones and Grau, “The SIAM Assessment Support System: Initial Application and Database Specification”, 10–11.

  12. 12.

    E.g., see Kristof Verfaillie and Rosamunde van Brakel, “Assessing security threats in mass transportation sites”, SIAM Deliverable 6.2, (European Commission, 2012).

  13. 13.

    See Sect. 4.2.2.

  14. 14.

    For some common approaches, see I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 7th ed. (Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley, 2006).

  15. 15.

    E.g., “A Global Approach for European Civil Aviation Security”, White paper, Version 1.0, (EOS Civil Aviation Security Working Group 2009).

  16. 16.

    E.g., Annex 17 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation – Security – Safeguarding International Civil Aviation against acts of unlawful interference, Ninth edition, (International Civil Aviation Organization, 2011).

  17. 17.

    See also Sect. 4.3.3.

  18. 18.

    Cf. Jones and Grau, “A Typology of Security Measure Technologies and Counter Infringement Technologies”, 7, 23.

  19. 19.

    Jones and Grau, “A Typology of Security Measure Technologies and Counter Infringement Technologies”, 5.

  20. 20.

    E.g., Regulation (EC) 300/2008.

  21. 21.

    For the specific perspective and task definitions adopted by SIAM, see Grau and Jones, “The SIAM Assessment Support Toolkit: A Software System for the Support of Technology Impact Assessments”, 7–9.

  22. 22.

    Jones and Grau, “A Typology of Security Measure Technologies and Counter Infringement Technologies”, 19–23.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 23–24.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 26–27.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 24–26.

  26. 26.

    Graeme Jones and Ronald Grau, “Updating the SIAM Application Specification from WP6”, SIAM deliverable D6.4, (European Commission, 2012), 7–8.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 9–12.

  28. 28.

    Graeme Jones and Ronald Grau, “Updating the SIAM Application Requirements: Crime-modelling and ASS tool development activities”, SIAM deliverable D7.3, (European Commission, 2013), 5–6.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 6–7.

  30. 30.

    Grau and Jones, “The SIAM Assessment Support Toolkit: A Software System for the Support of Technology Impact Assessments”.

  31. 31.

    Describing the entire range of interactive functionality verbally would require much more space than is available here. Note that the SIAM AST is free software and available for download at http://staffnet.kingston.ac.uk/siam/download/.

  32. 32.

    Described in Sect. 4.2.2.

  33. 33.

    See Sect. 4.4.2 for details.

  34. 34.

    See Sect. 4.4.3 for details.

  35. 35.

    See Sect. 4.4.4 for details.

  36. 36.

    For details on the methodology applied, see Yair Sharan et al., “Threat Scenarios Report”, SIAM deliverable D6.3, (European Commission, 2012).

  37. 37.

    See Sect. 4.3.1 for the SMT typology used.

  38. 38.

    The filters provide the same constraining functionality (tasks, topics, aspects) as the topic selector, however they are much quicker to use and intended for pro-users who acquired a certain routine in using the tool.

  39. 39.

    E.g., T.J. Menzies. “Knowledge Elicitation: the State of the Art”, in: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Volume II. 2002.

  40. 40.

    E.g., P.C-H. Cheng and R. Barone, Representing complex problems: A representational epistemic approach. In Jonassen, D.H. (ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems, (Mahmah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007), 97–130.

  41. 41.

    For instance, by using diagrammatic knowledge-based systems: Ronald Grau and P.C.-H. Cheng, “The Support of Higher-level Cognition in the Context of Ill-structured Process Knowledge”, 2nd Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems, (Baltimore, MD, 2013).

  42. 42.

    It is not possible to present detailed results within the space of this chapter but references have been provided to the respective reports, where possible. Due to the iterative nature of the evaluation process, many of the earlier results are also somewhat implicit in the final version of the prototype presented in Sect. 4.4.

  43. 43.

    A wireframe is a rapidly produced prototype with limited functionality that is commonly used for illustrating features in the early stages of software development. For details of the results see Andreas Timmermann, “User Forum Report”, SIAM Deliverable D 13.11, (European Commission, 2012).

  44. 44.

    For details, see Graeme Jones, Ronald Grau, and Hans Lammerant, “Updating the SIAM Application Requirements: Freedom Infringement; AST tool development activities”, SIAM deliverable D8.2, (European Commission, 2013).

  45. 45.

    For more details on the evaluation, see Leon Hempel, Lars Ostermeier, and Tobias Schaaf, “The SIAM User Forum, Report”, SIAM Deliverable 13.12, (European Commission, 2013).

  46. 46.

    E.g., some specific results are in Ekaterina de Vries and Veerle Pashley, “Report of the SIAM Workshop (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)”, SIAM Deliverable 13.17, (European Commission, 2014).

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 3.

  48. 48.

    De Vries and Pashley, “Report of the SIAM Workshop (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)”, 5.

Bibliography

  • “A Global Approach for European Civil Aviation Security”, White paper, Version 1.0, (EOS Civil Aviation Security Working Group 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annex 17 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation – Security – Safeguarding International Civil Aviation against acts of unlawful interference, Ninth edition, (International Civil Aviation Organization, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.C.-H., Barone, R. (2007). Representing complex problems: A representational epistemic approach. In Jonassen, D.H. (ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems, Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Cost Explosion: Price Tag for New Berlin Airport Keeps Rising”, accessed March 1, 2014, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/5-billion-euros-costs-increase-again-for-berlin-brandenburg-airport-a-928989.html.

  • De Vries, Ekaterina, and Veerle Pashley, “Report of the SIAM Workshop (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)”, SIAM Deliverable 13.17, European Commission, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission – CORDIS – Projects – SIAM, accessed March 1, 2014, http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/rcn/97990_en.html.

  • Fenz, Stefan, and Andreas Ekelhart, “Formalizing information security knowledge”, in: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security. (ACM, New York, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • “German defense minister to face grilling over Euro Hawk debacle”, accessed March 1, 2014, http://www.dw.de/german-defense-minister-to-face-grilling-over-euro-hawk-debacle/a-16964646.

  • Grau, R.R. and Cheng, P.C.-H., “The Support of Higher-level Cognition in the Context of Ill-structured Process Knowledge”, 2nd Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems, Baltimore, MD, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, Ronald, and Graeme Jones, “The SIAM Assessment Support Toolkit: A Software System for the Support of Technology Impact Assessments”, SIAM deliverable D11.2, European Commission, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Leon, Ostermeier, Lars, Schaaf, Tobias and Dagny Vedder, “Innovation Journey Report”, SIAM deliverable D2.4, European Commission, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Leon, Grau, Ronald, Ostermeier, Lars, Schäufele, Fabia, Schaaf, Tobias, and Dagny Vedder, “SIAM – Security Impact Assessment Measures. Ein System zur Unterstützung von Security Technology Assessments an Flughäfen und im öffentlichen Nahverkehr”, Oranienburger Schriften, Fachhochschule der Polizei des Landes Brandenburg, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Leon, Ostermeier, Lars, and Tobias Schaaf, “The SIAM User Forum, Report”, SIAM Deliverable 13.12, European Commission, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Graeme, and Ronald Grau, “A Typology of Security Measure Technologies and Counter Infringement Technologies”, SIAM deliverable D2.3, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Graeme, and Ronald Grau, “The SIAM Assessment Support System: Initial Application and Database Specification”, SIAM deliverable D11.1, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Graeme, and Ronald Grau, “Updating the SIAM Application Specification from WP6”, SIAM deliverable D6.4, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Graeme, and Ronald Grau, “Updating the SIAM Application Requirements: Crime-modelling and ASS tool development activities”, SIAM deliverable D7.3, European Commission, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Graeme, Grau, Ronald, and Hans Lammerant, “Updating the SIAM Application Requirements: Freedom Infringement; AST tool development activities”, SIAM deliverable D8.2, European Commission, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, George M., Decision support systems in the twenty-first century, Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, T.J., “Knowledge Elicitation: the State of the Art”, Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Volume II, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation No. EC 300/2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security, accessed March 1, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:097:0072:0084:EN:PDF.

  • Sharan, Yair, Rosenberg, Shlomo, Tzesana, Roey, Verfaillie, Kristof, Boyle, Phil, Migliorini, Massimo, and Christian L. Geminn, “Threat Scenarios Report”, SIAM deliverable D6.3, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I. Software Engineering, 7th ed. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The curious case of Berlin’s Brandenburg Airport: Will it ever open?”, accessed March 1, 2014, http://www.newstatesman.com/business/2013/09/curious-case-berlins-brandenburg-airport.

  • Timmermann, Andreas, “User Forum Report”, SIAM Deliverable D 13.11, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew, Polley, Douglas, Garud, Raghu and Sankaran Venkataraman, The Innovation Journey. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfaillie, Kristof and Rosamunde van Brakel, “Assessing security threats in mass transportation sites”, SIAM Deliverable 6.2, European Commission, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald R. Grau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grau, R.R. (2015). Models and Tools for the Computational Support of Technology Impact Assessments, Applied in the Context of Mass Transportation. In: Gutwirth, S., Leenes, R., de Hert, P. (eds) Reforming European Data Protection Law. Law, Governance and Technology Series(), vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics