Skip to main content

Systemic Leadership: Ethical and Effective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership, Gender, and Organization

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 27))

  • 3337 Accesses

Editors’ Introduction

This volume devotes a number of chapters to the possible productive interface that there may be between systemic thinking, leadership, and gender. Systems thinking help us understand the relational networks and dynamics that individuals encounter within organizations, and hence provide us with clues as to why leadership patterns emerge in specific ways. The next few chapters present us with a more theoretical overview of systems thinking and explain the notion of “systemic leadership”. After we have made the claims and assumptions of this approach clear, we will move towards a more focused discussion of what systemic leadership offer both male and female leaders in various contexts. In this first theoretical exposé of systemic leadership, Collier and Esteban propose that in postindustrial economies, “systemic leadership,” that is, leading from the middle of an organization and managing that system, its human participants and its paradoxes – creates solid and sustainable communities where participatory management is successfully achieved.

Reprinted from The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 2000, 21(4):207–215.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reprinted from The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 2000, 21(4):207–215.

References

  • Amabile, T. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 76(September/October):77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science 10(3):216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R.A. (1997). How can we train leaders if we do not know what leadership is? Human Relations 50(4):343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1993). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making. Academy of Management Review 35(1):232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1999). The end of leadership: Exemplary leadership is impossible without full inclusion, initiatives and co-operation of followers. Organizational Dynamics 28(1):71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. and B. Nanus (1985). Leaders: The Strategiesfor Taking Charge. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science 2(1):40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.L. and K. Eisenhardt (1998). Competing on the Edge; Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science 32(5):539–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J.B. (1998). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. In Ciulla, J.B. (ed.), Ethics: The Heart of Leadership. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1998). Theorising the ethical organization. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(4):621–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. and R. Esteban (1999). Governance in the participative organization: Freedom, creativity and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 21:173–188. Also as Judge Institute of Management Studies Working Paper 3/99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M.M., H.W. Lane and R.E. White (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24(3):522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F.R. (ed.) (1978). From Contract to Community: Political Theory at the Crossroads. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dering, N. (1998). Leadership in quality organizations. Journal for Quality and Participation 21(1):32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeman, R.L. and J.J. Dahlgaard (1998). A paradigm for leadership excellence. Total Quality Management 9(4/5):75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeman, R.L. and F. Scherer (1999). Systemic leadership via core value deployment. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal 20(2):94–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairtlough, G. (1999). Classical and romantic: Blending discipline and creativity in young companies, talk given at the Judge Institute of Management Studies, Cambridge, November 23, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and M.C. Jackson (1991). Critical Systems Thinking. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, R.M. and J.B. Keys (1998). A conversation with Peter Senge: New developments in organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics 27:33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and C.A. Bartlett (1998). The Individualized Corporation. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R.X. (1977). Servant Leadership. New York, NY: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application, Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (eds.) (1990). The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.A. (1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies 20(1):75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies 25(2):147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M., B.A. Stein and T.D. Jick (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. and M.A. Allison (1998). The Complexity Advantage. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M.F.R. (1996). Leadership for creativity: Generating peak experiences, INSEAD Working Paper 1996/62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezborn, D. (1998). The leadership factor: Leading the way towards the next millenium, Transactions of the American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Koftnan, F. and P. Senge (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organisations. Organizational Dynamics 22(2):5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J.M. and B.X. Posner (1995). The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations, 2nd edn. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, J. (1990). Lessons from the field: An essay on the crisis of leadership in contemporary organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 26(1):49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. and E. Wenger (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967). Organization and Environment. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. (1999). Linking competitive advantage with communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry 8(1):5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice, Which Rationality. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1994). Virtues, practices and justice. In S. Horton and J. Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alistair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J.K. and D.D. Conlon (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly 36:165–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P.G. (1991). Leadership: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S.D. and K.E. Weick (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualisation. Academy of Management Review 15:203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T.J. and R.H. Waterman (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W. and R. van Tulder (1995). The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, J.C. (1993). Leadership development in the new millenium. The Journal of Leadership Studies 1(1):92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1998). Organizations: Natural, Rational and Open. London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1992). The Moral Community: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Oganisation. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1997). Communities of leaders and learners. Harvard Business Review 75(5):30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaate, H.A. (1968). The Pertinence of the Paradox. New York, NY: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. and D. Berg (1987). Paradoxes of Group Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenschein, S. and J. Collier (1999). Social criticism in organizations: Business ethics and corporate learning. Judge Institute of Management Studies, Working Paper 26/99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R.D. (1996). Complexity and Creativity in Organisations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-KoehIer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Collier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collier, J., Esteban, R. (2011). Systemic Leadership: Ethical and Effective. In: Werhane, P., Painter-Morland, M. (eds) Leadership, Gender, and Organization. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics