Skip to main content

DNA Data Exchange: Germany Flexed Its Muscle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Protection in a Profiled World

Abstract

In the context of improving security, the European Council has incorporated the Prüm Treaty into a Council Decision binding on all EU member states. The core element of the Treaty is the creation of a network of national databases to promote the exchange of information between law enforcement authorities. In particular, reciprocal access is given to Contracting States’ national databases, containing DNA profiles, fingerprints and vehicle registration data. Although this initiative started as a multilateral agreement, a small group of influential countries led by Germany has successfully twisted the arms of other EU countries into integrating the provisions of the agreement into the legislative framework of the EU under the Third Pillar. While the EU law represents a progress in the field of cooperation against crime, it raises privacy and data protection issues which will affect all EU citizens, primarily due to the absence of common legally binding data protection standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Application Nos. 30562/04 30566/04 in the European Court of Human Rights. 2007. Application Nos. 30562/04 30566/04 in the European Court of Human Rights (March 15, 2007). http://www.poptel.org.uk/statewatch/news/2007/nov/echr-marper-submissions-15-03-07-final.pdf. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, Andy. May 2008. DNA bank solves one crime per 800 profiles. Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1929849/DNA-bank-solves-one-crime-per-800-profiles.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservatives. June 7, 2007. EU Constitution moves in by the back door. Conservatives. http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=wales.news.story.page&obj_id=137043. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Decision. 2008. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA. Also available online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:210:0001:0011:EN:PDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. 2007. Beware the state’s ID card sharks (Dec. 30, 2007). Sunday Times Online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3108069.ece. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J. June 15, 2007. Germany seeks to modernize policing across EU. International Herald Tribune. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/15/news/germany.php. Retrieved 26 Jan 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draft European Parliament Legislative Resolution. 2008. Draft European parliament legislative resolution: Report 2, April 2008. Also available online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&reference=A6-0099/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • eGov Monitor. 2007. Home affairs ministers back initiative to create a pan-European network of police databases for more effective crime control. eGov Monitor. (January 18, 2007). http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/9093. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Achievement. 2007. German-Foreign-Policy.com; 1/17/2007. Also available online in its entirety at http://ftrsupplemental.blogspot.com/2007/01/european-achievement.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament legislative resolution. 2007. European Parliament legislative resolution on the initiative by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Kingdom of Sweden on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (6566/2007—C6-0079/2007—2007/0804(CNS)) (June 7, 2007). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-0228. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofacts. 9 February 2007. Slimmed down treaty: The greatest threat to UK. Eurofacts. http://www.junepress.com/PDF/Vol%2012%20No%20%209%20-%209th%20February%202007.pdf. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.GeneWatch. 2006. Would 114 murderers have walked away if innocent people’s records were removed from the National DNA Database? GeneWatch. http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03c6d66a9b354535738483c1c3d49e4/brown.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Justice report. 2008. House of commons. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmjust/154/15402.htm. Retrieved 28 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. 9 May 2007. Prüm: An effective weapon against terrorism and crime? Statewatch. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/may/eu-hol-prum-report.pdf. Retrieved 27 June 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Report. 2007. Parliamentary Report on the initiative by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Kingdom of Sweden on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime. (6566/2007—C6-0079/2007—2007/0804(CNS)) (May 24, 2007). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-0207&language=EN#_part2_def1_part2_def1. Retrieved 27 Jan 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaffardi, Lucia. 2008. Legal protection and management of genetic databases: Challenges of the European process of harmonisation. Jean Monnet Working Paper 19/08. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telegraph. 14 July 2009. DNA database expanding by 40,000 profiles a month. Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5827457/DNA-database-expanding-by-40000-profiles-a-month.htmlchaos.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Data Protection Supervisor. 2007a. Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Kingdom of Sweden, with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (2007/C 169/02). Also available online at http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2007/07-04-04_crossborder_cooperation_EN.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Data Protection Supervisor. 2007b. Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Kingdom of Sweden, with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, Council of the European Union, Brussels, 20 April 2007, 8656/07. Also available online at http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2007/07-04-04_crossborder_cooperation_EN.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, M. 2007. DNA database with 500,000 false or misspelt entries. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/dna-database-chaos-with-500000-false-or-misspelt-entries-463055.html. Retrieved 3 Sept 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier extended version of this article was published in Computer Law and Security Report, Vol. 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 243–252.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Kierkegaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

President, International Association of IT Lawyers; editor-in-chief, International Journal of Private Law; Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Intl. Commercial Law &Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kierkegaard, S. (2010). DNA Data Exchange: Germany Flexed Its Muscle. In: Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., De Hert, P. (eds) Data Protection in a Profiled World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics