Skip to main content
  • 64 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Phonetik als Wissenschaft von der Sprache läßt sich nicht leicht innerhalb von bestimmten Grenzen umschließen. Es ist auch nicht leicht, die Frage zu beantworten, wer ein Phonetiker ist und wer es nicht ist, wenn man alle jene Fachleute bedenkt, welche etwas zu dem Wissen über die Sprache beitragen, wie wir sprechen, was wir sprechen und was wir hören, wenn andere sprechen. Im allgemeinen denkt man sich den Phonetiker als einen Fachmann mit einem profunden Wissen über Sprachen und Dialekte, im Besitze eines scharfen Gehörs und eines geschulten Verstandes zum Aufschreiben von Beobachtungen über seine Gehörseindrücke, wobei er sich der phonetischen Schrift bedient. Der klassische Phonetiker ist als Professor Higgins in G. B. Shaws Schauspiel Pygmalion verewigt. Dieser ist aber auch ein Lehrer der Sprache und ein Behüter einer reinen Sprechweise. Shaw dachte an einen seiner Zeitgenossen und Freunde, nämlich Henry Sweet, als er diese Figur schuf (10).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Phonetik und Sprachforschung

  1. BJöRK, L.: Velopharyngeal funetion in connected speech. Studies using tomography and cineradiography synchronized with speech spectrography. Thesis work. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 202 (Stockholm, 1961), 94 pp. (From the Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology of the University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, and the Speech Transmission Laboratory of the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.).

    Google Scholar 

  2. BJöRK, L., B. NYlen, A. MöLLER,and G. FANT: Velopharyngeal funetion in connected speech. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL-QPSR-1/1961), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CArmody, F. J.: X-ray studies of speech articulation. University Calif. Publ. in Mod.Philology. 20: No. 4 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  4. CHerry, C., M. HAlle, and R. JAkobson: Toward a logical description of languages in their phonemic aspects. Language. 2 9: 34–46, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CHiba, T., and M. KAjiyama: The vowel its nature and strueture. (Tokyo, 1941.).

    Google Scholar 

  6. COoper, F. S.: Speech synthesizers. Proc. of the IV Int. Congr. of Phon. Sciences, Helsinki, p. 3–1 (’s-Gra venhage, 1962.).

    Google Scholar 

  7. COoper, F. S., P. C. DEllatre, A. M. LIberman, J. M. BOrst, and L. J. GErstaman: Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. J.Acoust. Soc. Amer. 24: 597–606, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DEllatre, P. C., A. M.LIebermann, and F. S. COoper: Voyelles synthetiques ä deux formantes et voyelles cardinales. Maitre Phonetique. 96: 30–36, 1951;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Acoustic loci and transitional cuesfor consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 27: 769 — 773, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DIeth, E.: Vademekum der Phonetik. (Bern, 1950. ) I I. FAABORG-ANDERSEN, K.: Electromyographic investigation of intrinsic laryngeal muscles in humans. ( Copenhagen, 1957 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. FANO, R. M.: The information theory point of view in speech communication. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 22: 691 — 692, 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FANT, G.: On the predietability of formant levels and spectrum envelopas from formant frequencies.For Roman Jakobson. (’s-Gravenhage, 1956), 109–120;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Modern instruments and methods for acoustic studies of speech. Acta Polytech. Scand. 246/1958, 84 pp.; also publ. in Proc. of VIII Int. Congr. of Linguists Oslo, 282–358. (Oslo, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  14. FISCHER-JORGENSEN, E.: Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. Mise. Phonetica. 2: 42–59, 1954. —

    Google Scholar 

  15. Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish. Ericsson Technics. 15: 1–106, 1959;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Acoustic theory of speech produetion (’s-Gravenhage, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  17. Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. Logos, 5: 3–17, 1962;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Formants and cavities. Proc. of the V Int. Congr. of Phon. Sciences, Münster, 120–141. (Basel, 1965 );

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sound, features and perception. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL-QPSR-2-3/1967), 1 –1 4; also to be publ. in the Proc. of the VI Int. Congr. of Phon. Sciences, Prague 1967;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Analysis and synthesis of speech processes. A chapter prepared for Manual of Phonetics (ed. B. MALMBERG). (’s-Gravenhage, 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. FANT, G., and K. N. STEVENS: Systems for speech compression. Fortschritte der Hochfrequenztechnik, 5: 229–262. (Frankfurt am Main, 1960 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. FANT, G., and J. MARTONY: Speech synthesis. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL- Q P S R - 2 / 1 9 6 2 ) , 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  23. FANT, G., J. ONDRAöKOVA, J. LINDQVIST, and B. SONESSON : Electrical glottography. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL-QPSR-4/1966), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. FISCHER-JORGENSEN, E.: Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. Mise. Phonetica. 2: 42–59, 1954. —

    Google Scholar 

  25. FLANAGAN, J. L.: Difference limen for vowel formant frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer 27: 613–617, 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. FUJIMURA, O.: Analysis of nasal consonants. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report-60 (Jan. 15, 1961 ), 184–188.

    Google Scholar 

  27. GRüTZMACHER, M., and W. LOTTERMOSER: über ein Verfahren zur trägheitsfreien Aufzeichnung von Melodiekurven. Akust. Z. 242 — 248, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  28. HALLE, M.: The strategy of phonemics. Word. 10: 197—209, 1954. — 30. HATTORI, S „K. YAMAMOTO, and O. FUJTMURA: Nasalization of vowels and nasals. Bull, of the Kobayasi Inst, of Phys. Res. 6: 226–235, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  29. HEINZ, J. M.: Analysis of fricative consonants. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report-60 (Jan. 15, 1961), 181 –184.

    Google Scholar 

  30. HOCKETT, C. F.: Manual of phonology. 282 Phonetik und Sprachforschung 282 Indiana Univ. Publ. in Anthropology and Linguistics No. 11. (Bloomington, 1955 ).

    Google Scholar 

  31. HOUSE, A. S., and K. N. STEVENS: Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels. J. Speech Dis. 21: 218–232, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. P. A.-alphabet: The principles of the International Phonetic Association. Dept. of Phonetics, University College London, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  33. JAKOBSON, R., G. FANT, and M. HALLE: Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Acoustics Laboratory Technical Report No. 13 (1952); 4th printing publ. by The M. I. T. Press. ( Cambridge, Mass. 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  34. JAKOBSON, R., and M. HALLE: Fundamentals of language. (’s-Gravenhage, 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Joos, M.: Acoustics phonetics. Language. 24: 1–136, 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. KOZHEVNIKOV, V. A., and L. A. CHISTOVICH: Speech: articulation and perception. (Engl. translationfromRussian, U. S. Dept. of Commerce, JPRS: 30, 543. Washington, D. C., 1965 ).

    Google Scholar 

  37. LADEFOGED, P.: The regulation of sub-glottal pressure. Folia Phoniatr. 12: 169–175, 1960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. LAWRENCE, W.: The synthesis of speech from signals which have a low informationrate. Communication theory (ed. W. JACKSON), 460–469. (London, 1953 ).

    Google Scholar 

  39. LIBERMAN, A. M.: Some results of research on speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 29: 117 –123,1957.

    Google Scholar 

  40. LIBERMAN, A. M., F. INGEMANN, L. LISKER, P. DELATTRE, and F. S. COOPER: Minimal rules for synthesizing speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 31: 1490–1499, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  41. LIBERMAN, A. M.: Some results of research on speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 29: 117 –123,1957.

    Google Scholar 

  42. LIBERMAN, A. M.: Some results of research on speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 29: 117 –123,1957.

    Google Scholar 

  43. LINDBLOM, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 35: 1773 bis 1781, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  44. MENZERATH, P., and A. DE LACERDA: Koartikulation, Steuerung und Lautabgrenzung. ( Berlin-Bonn, 1933 ).

    Google Scholar 

  45. MEYER-EPPLER, W., and G. UNGEHEUER: Die Vokalartikulationals Eigenwertproblem. Z. Phonetik allg. Sprachwissen. 10: Heft 3, 245–257, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  46. MILLER, R. L.: Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 2 5 : 114–21

    Google Scholar 

  47. 1953; — 47. Nature of the vocal cord wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 31: 667 — 677, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  48. NYLEN, B.: Cleft palate and speech. A surgical study including observations on velopharyngeal closure during connected speech, using synchronized cineradiography and sound spectrography. Thesis work. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 203 (Stockholm, 1961), 124 pp

    Google Scholar 

  49. öHMAN, S. E. G.: Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 39: 151 –168,1966;

    Google Scholar 

  50. Word and sentence intonation: a quantitative model. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL-QPSR 2–3/1967), 20–54.

    Google Scholar 

  51. PETERSON, G. E.: The phonetic value of vowels. Language. 27: 541 — 553, 1951;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. The information bearing elements of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 24: 629–637, 1952;

    Google Scholar 

  53. Parameters of vowel quality. J. Speech Hearing Res. 4: 10–29, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  54. PETERSON, G. E., and H. L. BARNEY: Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 24: 1752–184, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  55. PETERSON, G. E., and G. RAISBECK: The measurement of voice with the sound spectrograph. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 2 5: 1157–1162, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  56. POTTER, R. K., et al.: Technical aspects of visible speech. Bell Telephone System, Monograph B-1415, 1946;. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 17: 89 pp., 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  57. POTTER, R. K., A. G. KOPP and H. C. GREEN: Visible speech. (New York, 1957 ).

    Google Scholar 

  58. POTTER, R. K., and J. C. STEINBERG: Toward the specifieation of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 22: 807–820, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  59. ROSEN, G.: Dynemic analog speech synthesizer. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 30: 201–209, 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. ROUSSELOT, L’ABBE, P. J.: Principes de phonetique experimentale. Parts I and I I. ( Paris, 1924 ).

    Google Scholar 

  61. RüSSEL, G. O.: The vowel. ( Columbus, 1928 ).

    Google Scholar 

  62. SIEVERS, E.: Grundzüge der Phonetik. (Leipzig, 1885 ).

    Google Scholar 

  63. SHANNON, C. E.: Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell System Teehn. J. 30: 50–64, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sovi- JÄRVT, A.: Die gehaltenen, geflüsterten und gesungenen Vokale und Nasale der finnischen Sprache. ( Helsinki, 1938 ).

    Google Scholar 

  65. STEVENS, K. N.: Toward a model for speech recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 32: 47–55, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  66. STEVENS, K. N., H. FUJISAKI and A. S. HOUSE: Analysis of vowel spectra. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report-60 (Jan. 15, 1961 ), 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  67. STEVENS, K. N., and A. S. HOUSE: Development of a quantitative description of vowel articulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 27: 484–493, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  68. STevens, K. N., S. KASOWSKI and G. FANT: An electrical analog of the vocal tract. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 25: 734–742, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  69. STevens, K . N., A. S. HOuse and A. P. PAul: Acoustical description of syllabic nuclei: an interpretation in terms of a dynamic model of articulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 4 0 : 123 –132 , 1 9 6 6 .

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stevens, K. N., and A. S. HOUSE: Speech perception. A chapter prepared for Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory (eds. J. TOBIAS and E. SCHUBERT). Under preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Truby, H. M.: Acoustico-cineradiographic analysis considerations with aspecial reference to certain consonantal complexes. Thesis work. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 182 (Stockholm, 1959 ), 227 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ungeheuera, G.: Elemente einer akustischen Theorie der Vokalartikulation. (Berlin, 1962 ).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Van, J.: Subglottal pressures and vibrations of the vocal folds. Folia Phoniatr.9: 6 5 –7 1, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fant, G. (1970). Phonetik und Sprachforschung. In: Handbuch der Stimm- und Sprachheilkunde. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7130-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7130-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7131-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7130-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics