Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nahttechniken

  • Chapter
Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie

  • 60 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Seit Einführung der chirurgischen Naht wurde das Fadenmaterial bis heute stetig weiterentwickelt. Die natürlichen Materialien wurden weitgehend durch die synthetischen Fäden ersetzt, die durchwegs bessere Eigenschaften besitzen. In der gastrointestinalen Chirurgie haben sich resorbierbare Fäden durchgesetzt. Dabei ermöglichen monofile, resorbierbare Fäden, die doppelt armiert sind, die sichere und kostengünstigste Form der fortlaufend genähten, extramukösen Darmanastomose auf Stoß. Nur technisch schwierige Anastomosen am Ösophagus oder transanal am Dickdarm, bei denen die Nähte vorgelegt werden, müssen in Einzelknopfnahttechnik genäht werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allgöwer M, Hasse J, Herzog B (1971) Colonresektionen. Chirurg 42:1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee I-Y et al. (1995) Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaerials 16:1141–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RP (1992) Knotting technique and suture materials. Br J Surg 79:399–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M et al. (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: A comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29:52–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demartines N, Rothenbühler JM, Chevalley JP et al. (1991) The single-layer continuous suture for gastric anastomosis. World J Surg 15(4):522–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demartines N, von Flüe M, Harder F (1998) Neuer Analretraktor für handgenähte coloanale Anastomosen. Chirurg 69:1376–1377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald D, Shumway S, Albear P et al. (1994) Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J Surg Research 56:372–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harder F, Kull C (1987) Fortlaufende einreihige Darmanastomose. Chirurg 58:269–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann JB, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ (1964) Healing of colonic anastomosis in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119:269–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog B (1974) Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie, Bd. XX: Die Darmnaht. Huber, Bern Stuttgart Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund DEW (1974) Knot properties of surgical suture material. Acta Chir Scand 140:355–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1994) Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots. Eur J Surg 160:323–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz AR, Turner RJ (1970) Evaluation of tensile and absorption properties of polyglycolic acid sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131:701–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Max E, Sweeney WB, Bailey HR et al. (1991) Results of 1,000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 162(5):461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald ML, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM et al. (1995) Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach. Surgery 118(4):582–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nockemann PF (1980) Die chirurgische Naht, 3. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwait RW (1970) Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg 171:892–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinbach D, McGregor JR, O’Dwyer PJ (1993) Effect of suture material on tumour cell adherence at site of colonic injury. Br J Surg 80:774–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW et al. (1996) Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture. J Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 6:181–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semjonow A, Brandt M, Reul H et al. (1993) Knotenoberfläche und Knotenzugfestigkeit von Polypropylen Monofilamenten. Biomed Technik 38:21–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setzen G, Williams EF (1997) Tissue response to suture materials implanted subcutaneously in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1788–1795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G et al. (1994) Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 8:1285–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit IB, Witte E, Brand R et al. (1991) Tissue reaction to suture materials revisited: Is there argument to change our views? Eur Surg Res 23:347–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA et al. (1998) Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg 22:78–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R et al. (1995) Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: Poliglecaprone 25 (Moncryl). Eur J Surg 161:319 – 322

    Google Scholar 

  • Uff CR, Yiu CY, Boulos PB et al. (1993) Influence of suture physicochemical and surface topographic structure on tumor cell adherence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:850–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Ollier JC (1984) Etude critique et bilan des sutures mécaniques dans le domaine de la chirurgie rectale. Dans: Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Ollier JC (eds) Actualiteś chirurgicales. Chirurgie abdominale et digestive. Sutures digestives mécaniques. Masson, Paris, pp 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttcher K, Feussner H, Dittler HJ, Etter M, Roder JD, Siewert JR (1998) Laparoskopische Resektion von Magenwandtumoren. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongressband) 1637

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttcher K, Stier A, Roder JD, Etter M, Siewert JR (1998) Ergebnisse der Oesophagojejunoplikatio in Stapler-Technik. In: Schumpelick V, Schippers E (Hrsg) Pouch. Grundlagen — Funktion — Technik — Ergebnisse. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhl K, Lehnert K, Schlag P, Herfarth C (1995) Reconstruction after gastrectomy and quality of life. World J Surg 19:835–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion JP, Nomikos J, Launois B (1988) Duodenal closure and esophago-jejunostomy. Experience with mechanical stapling devices in total gastrectomy for cancer. Arch Surg 123:979–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung RS (1987) Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 206:335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detry RJ, Kartheuser A, Delriviere L, Saba J, Kestens PJ (1995) Use of the circular stapler in 1000 consecutive colorectal anastomoses: experience of one surgical team. Surgery 117:140–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dziki AJ, Duncan MD, Harmon JW (1991) Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 34:442–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J (1986) Comparison of stapling and handsuture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 73:345–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Endoh F et al. (1991) Stapled or manual suturing in esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A comparison of outcome in 379 patients. Am J Surg 162:256–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs KH, Thiede A, Engemann R, Deltz E, Stremme O, Hamelmann H (1995) Reconstruction of the food passage after total gastrectomy: randomized trial. World J Surg 19:678–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haalbööck O, Pahlmann L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjodahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haalböök O, Johannson K, Sjodahl R (1996) Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma — comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction. Br J Surg 83:389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habu H, Kando F, Saito N, Sato Y, Takeshita K, Sunagawa M, Endo M (1989) Experience with the EEA stapler for esophagojejunostomy. Int Surg 74:73–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K et al. (1996) Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Prospective randomized study for determination of optimal pouch size. Dis Colon Rectum 39:986–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher AH, Siewert JR (1992) Stapler am Gastrointestinaltrakt — pro und contra. Langenbecks Arch Chir 377:56–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hültl H (1911) Chirurgisches Nahtinstrument für Magen- und Darmnaht. Fischer, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Izbicki JR, Gawad KA, Quirrenbach S, Hosch SB, Breid V, Knoefel WT Küpper HU, Broelsch CE (1998) Ist die Klammernaht in der Visceralchirurgie noch gerechtfertigt? Eine prospektiv kontrollierte, randomisierte Studie zur Kosteneffektivität von Hand- und Klammernaht. Chirurg 69:725–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, Maruyama K (1997) Wedge resection of the stomach for gastric leiomyosarcoma. Br J Surg 84:560–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka M, Masaoko A, Hayashi S, Honda H, Hotta T, Niwa T, Honda K (1989) Problems associated with the EEA stapling technique for esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 209:99–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyzer S, Gordon PH. Experience with the use of circular stapler in rectal surgery (1992) Dis Colon Rectum 35:696–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E (1986) Resection of the rectum with reconstruction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo E, Belli F, Baldini MT (1993) Total rectal resection, colo-endoanal anastomosis and colic reservoir for cancer of the lower third of the rectum. Eur J Surg Oncol 19:283–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lünstedt B, Engemann R, Thiede A (1993) Kontrollierter Vergleich der Handnaht mit der Klammernahttechnik und klinische Konsequenzen in der kolorektalen Chirurgie. In: Fuchs KH, Engemann R, Thiede A (Hrsg) Klammernahtechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 115–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire J, Wright IC, Leverment JN (1997) Surgical staplers: a review. J R Coll Surg 42:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JB (1892) Cholecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, enterointestinal ana-stomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Rec 42:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohgami M, Otani Y, Kumai K, Kubota T, Kim Y-I, Kitajima M (1999) Curative laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer: five years experience. World J Surg 23:187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omote K, Feussner H, Stein HJ, Ungeheuer A, Siewert JR (1999) Endoscopic stapling divertculostomy for Zenkerś diverticulum. Surg Endoscopy 13:535–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrassy A, Roncone A, Formisani P, Ianello A (1994) Results of the multicenter study (A.C.O.I. Stapler Study Group) on 420 cases of esophagojejunal and 544 cases of colorectal anastomoses. Ann Ital Chir 65:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Petz AV (1924) Zur Technik der Magenresektion. Ein neuer Magen-Darm-Nähapparat. Zentralbl Chir 51:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Steichen FM (1993) Anekdotisches aus der Entwicklung der Klammernahtinstrumente und der Klammernahttechnik. In: Fuchs KH, Engemann R, Thiede A (Hrsg) Klammernahttechnik in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 1–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR (1997) Factors associated with the occurence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:105–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viste A, Eide GE, Soreide O (1987) Stomach cancer: a prospective study of anastomotic failure following total gastrectomy. Acta Chir Scand 153:303–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. W. R. Marti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Harder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Böttcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland

    J. R. Siewert

  2. Department für Chirurgie, Kantonsspital Basel, Spitalstraße 21, 4031, Basel, Schweiz

    F. Harder

  3. Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin I, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland

    M. Rothmund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marti, W.R., Harder, F., Böttcher, K. (2002). Nahttechniken. In: Siewert, J.R., Harder, F., Rothmund, M. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09418-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09418-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-09419-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09418-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation