Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisatorischer Wandel und Lernen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organisation

  • 1691 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Management von Veränderungsprozessen – Change Management – ist sowohl in der Forschung als auch in der Managementpraxis zu einem zentralen Thema geworden. Dieses Kapitel stellt die gängigsten Ansätze zum organisatorischen Wandel dar, unterschieden nach der Konzeption von Wandel als abgeschlossenem Projekt und als kontinuierlichem Prozess. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit wird der Frage nach erfolgreichen Veränderungsprozessen zuteil, und es wird diskutiert, wie Widerstände gegen Änderungen bearbeitet werden können und welche Rolle Beratung dabei zukommt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adler, P. S./Goldoftas, B./Levine, D. I. (1999): Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system, in: Organization Science 10 (1), S. 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937): Personality: A psychological interpretation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (2012): Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1982): Reasoning, learning and action, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1985): Strategy, change and defensive routines, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1990): Overcoming organizational defenses, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C./Schön, D. A. (1978): Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1994): Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, R. J./Grinder, J. (1982): Reframing. Neurolinguistic programming and the transformation of meaning, Moab, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986): Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972): Steps to an ecology of mind, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. (1967): The confrontation meeting, in: Harvard Business Review 45 (2), S. 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, C. M./Haunschild, P. R. (2002): Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (1), S. 92–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J./Tushman, M. L. (2003): Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, in: Academy of Management Review 28 (2), S. 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. v. (1972): Systemtheorie, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961): Experiences in groups and other papers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovey, W. H./Hede, A. (2001): Resistance to organizational change: the role of cognitive and affective processes, in: Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22 (8), S. 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S./Duguid, P. (2001): Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective, in: Organization Science 12 (2), S. 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2000): Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups, 2. Aufl., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L./Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998): Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buer, F. (2003): Aufstellungsarbeit in Organisationen – der klassische Ansatz nach Moreno, in: Supervision 2, S. 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. (2004): Innovationen in Organisationen, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2002): A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development, in: Organization Science 13 (4), S. 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchin, G./Lane, G./Ray, W. A. (1992): Vom strategischen Vorgehen zur Nicht-Intervention: Für mehr Eigenständigkeit in der Systemischen Praxis, in: Familiendynamik 17, S. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L./French Jr., J. R. P. (1948): Overcoming resistance to change, in: Human Relations 1, S. 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M./Bacdayan, P. (1994): Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study, in: Organization Science 5 (4), S. 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T./Worley, C. (2014): Organization development and change, St. Paul, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Aveni, R. A. (1994): Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H./Prusak, L. (1998): Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. B./Goldberg, S. G. (1999): Challenging 'resistance to change', in: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35 (1), S. 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch, L./Schüßler, E. (2012): Theorizing path dependence: a review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations, in: Industrial and Corporate Change 22 (3), S. 617–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E./Duncan, R. B. (1987): The influence of the strategic planning process on strategic change, in: Strategic Management Journal 8 (2), S. 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M./Martin, J. A. (2000): Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, in: Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11), S. 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C./Lee, J./Schilling, M. A. (2010): Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning, in: Organization Science 21 (3), S. 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S. (2000): Organizational routines as a source of continuous change, in: Organization Science 11 (6), S. 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S./Orlikowski, W. J. (2011): Theorizing practice and practicing theory, in: Organization Science 22 (5), S. 1240–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S./Pentland, B. T. (2003): Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (1), S. 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fengler, J. (1981): Grenzen der Gruppendynamik, in: Bachmann, C. H. (Hrsg.): Kritik der Gruppendynamik, Frankfurt a.M., S. 118–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D./Ford, L. W./D'Amelio, A. (2008): Resistance to change: The rest of the story, in: Academy of Management Review 33 (2), S. 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J./Husted, K./Michailova, S. (2010): Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions, in: Journal of Management Studies 47 (3), S. 455–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiling, J. (2001): Resource-based View und ökonomische Theorie, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D./Boerner, S. (1997): Mentale Lernbarrieren in Organisationen und Ansätze zu ihrer Überwindung Handbuch Lernende Organisation, Wiesbaden, S. 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D. (2006): Wissen und Narration: der Kern des Wissensmanagements, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D./Antonacopoulou, E. (2009): Narratives and organizational dynamics: Exploring blind spots and organizational inertia, in: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 45 (3), S. 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D./Schreyögg, G. (2009): Coping with the concept of knowledge: toward a discursive understanding of knowledge. Management Learning 40 (4), S. 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D./Schreyögg, G. (2012): Narratives in knowledge sharing: challenging validity, in: Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (1), S. 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D./Schröder, A. (2014): Ever-changing routines? Toward a revised understanding of organizational routines between rule-following and rule-breaking, in: Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR) 66, S. 170–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1991): Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm, in: Academy of Management Review 16 (1), S. 10–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal 17 (Special Issue), S. 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. (1980): Psychology of learning, in: American Psychologist 35 (8), S. 713–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. E. (1967): Patterns of organization change, in: Harvard Business Review 45 (3), S. 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. E. (1972): Evolution and revolution as organizations grow, in: Harvard Business Review 50 (4), S. 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S./Strati, A. (2012): Learning and knowing in practice-based studies, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band I und II, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefliger, S./Von Krogh, G./Spaeth, S. (2008): Code reuse in open source software, in: Management Science 54 (1), S. 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T./Freeman, J. (1984): Structural inertia and organizational change, in: American Sociological Review 49 (2), S. 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J./Salomo, S. (2011): Innovationsmanagement, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. (1981): How organizations learn and unlearn, in: Nystrom, P. C./Starbuck, W. H. (Hrsg.): Handbook of organizational design, New York, S. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E./Peteraf, M. A. (2003): The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles, in: Strategic Management Journal 24 (10), S. 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E./Winter, S. G. (2011): Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n) ever‐changing world, in: Strategic Management Journal 32 (11), S. 1243–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M./Cockburn, I. M. (1994): Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research, in: Strategic Management Journal 15 (8), S. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, F. (1992): Aufbauorganisation, in: Frese, E. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Organisation, 3. Aufl., Stuttgart, Spalte 208–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature, in: Organization Science 2 (1), S. 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A. S. (1990): Mapping strategic thought, Chichester et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L./King, B. T. (1958): The influence of roleplaying on opinion change, in: Maccoby, E. E./Newcomb, T. M./Hartley, E. L. (Hrsg.): Readings in social psychology, 3. Aufl., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M./Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990): The innovation marathon: Lessons from high-technology firms, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J. M./Knights, D./Nord, W. R. (1994): Resistance and power in organizations, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian, S. D./Ofori‐Dankwa, J. C./Justis, R. T. (2008): Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures, in: Strategic Management Journal 29 (9), S. 963–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R./Allen, T. J. (1988): Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 RED project groups, in: Tushman, M./Moore, W.L. (Hrsg.): Readings in the management of innovation, Cambridge, Mass., S. 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1955): Salience of membership and resistance to change of group-anchored attitudes, in: Human Relations 8 (3), S. 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A./Ebers, M. (2014): Organisationstheorien, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, R./Covin, T. J. (1988) (Hrsg.): Corporate transformation: Revitalizing Organizations for a competitive world, San Francisco/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B./Zander, U. (1992): Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, in: Organization Science 3 (3), S. 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolks, U. (1990): Strategieimplementierung, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J./Salk, J. E./Lyles, M. A. (2001): Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures, in: Strategic Management Journal 22 (12), S. 1139–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A./Smallman, C./Tsoukas, H./Van de Ven, A. H. (2013): Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow, in: Academy of Management Journal 56 (1), S. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R. (1954): How to deal with resistance to change, in: Harvard Business Review 32 (3), S. 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, J. M./Ötsch, W. O. (2015): Jenseits der Hierarchie. Status im beruflichen Alltag aktiv gestalten, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995): Wellsprings of knowledge, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B./March, J. G. (1988): Organizational learning, in: Annual Review of Sociology 14, S. 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A./Merry, U. (1986): Organizational transformation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1943): Forces behind food habits and methods of change, in: Bulletin of the National Research Council (108), S. 35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1958): Group decision and social change, in: Maccoby, E. E./Newcomb, T. M./Hartley, E. L. (Hrsg.): Readings in social psychology, 3. Aufl., New York, S. 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967): The human organization: Its management and value, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looss, W. (2006): Unter vier Augen: Coaching für Manager, Bergisch Gladbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. (1972): Einführung in die Gruppendynamik, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984): Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995): Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation, 4. Aufl., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1999): Das postmoderne Wissen. Ein Bericht, Bd. 4, (Übers. a.d. Französischem), Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, H./Spada, H. (1988) (Hrsg.): Wissenspsychologie, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991): Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, in: Organization Science 2 (1), S. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994): A primer on decision making, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G./Olsen, J. P. (1979): Ambiguity and choice in organizations, Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D./Friesen, P. (1984): Organization. A quantum view, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A. (1995): Discontinuous change: Leading organizational transformation, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1979): Kognition und Wirklichkeit, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991): The knowledge-creating company, in: Harvard Business Review 69 (6), S. 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science 5 (1), S. 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I./Krogh, G. von (2009): Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory, in: Organization Science 20 (3), S. 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I./Takeuchi, H. (1995): The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996): Talking about machines. An ethnography of a modern job, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A./Howard-Grenville, J. (2011): Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives, in: The Academy of Management Annals 5 (1), S. 413–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perich, R. (1992): Unternehmensdynamik. Zur Entwicklungsfähigkeit von Organisationen aus zeitlich-dynamischer Sicht, Bern/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985): Meine Theorie der geistigen Entwicklung, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piderit, S. K. (2000): Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalent attitudes toward organizational change: A multidimensional view, in: Academy of Management Review 25 (4), S. 783–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966): The tacit dimension, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L./Wildavsky, A. B. (1984): Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E./Cameron, K. (1983): Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence, in: Management Science 29 (1), S. 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechtien, W. (1992): Angewandte Gruppendynamik. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Praktiker, Berlin/München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rerup, C./Feldman, M. S. (2011): Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning, in: Academy of Management Journal 54 (3), S. 577–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1996): Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E./Tushman, M. L. (1994): Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test, in: Academy of Management Journal 37 (5), S. 1141–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronken, H. O./Lawrence, P. R. (1952): Administering changes: A case study of human relations in a factory, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./Deeds, D. L. (2004): Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development, in: Strategic Management Journal 25 (3), S. 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenbücher, C. (2012): Organisationsaufstellung im Konfliktmanagement, in: Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching 19 (2), S. 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949): The concept of mind, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1969): Process consultation, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1999): Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiersmann, C./Thiel, H.-U. (2013): Organisationsentwicklung. Prinzipien und Strategien von Veränderungsprozessen, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, F./Knödler, D./Tasto, M. (2012): Innovationsfähigkeit durch Reflexivität: Neue Perspektiven auf Praktiken des Change Management, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, A. (2012): Coaching: Eine Einführung für Praxis und Ausbildung. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Eberl, M. (2015): Organisationale Kompetenzen. Grundlagen – Modelle – Fallbeispiele, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Geiger, D. (2005): Reconsidering organizational knowledge: Knowledge, skills and narrations, in: Schreyögg, G./Koch, J. (Hrsg.): Narratives and knowledge management, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Geiger, D. (2007): The significance of distinctiveness: A proposal for rethinking organizational knowledge, in: Organization 14 (1), S. 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Höpfl, H. (2004): Theatre and organization: Editorial introduction, in: Organization Studies 25 (2), S. 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007): How dynamic can capabilities be?, in: Strategic Management Journal 28 (9), S. 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Noss, C. (2000): Von der Episode zum fortwährenden Prozess – Wege jenseit der Gleichgewichtslogik im Organisatorischen Wandel, in: Schreyögg, G./Conrad, P. (Hrsg.): Organisatorischer Wandel und Transformation – Managementforschung Bd. 10, Wiesbaden, S. 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (2010): Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms, in: Organization Science 21 (6), S. 1251–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüssler, E./Rüling, C./Wittneben, B. (2013): On melting summits: The limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy, in: Academy of Management Journal 57 (1), S. 140–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secord, P. F./Backman, C. W. (1964): Social psychology, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, B. (1973) (Hrsg.): Kognitive Strukturiertheit, Stuttgart et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini Palazzoli, M./Anolli, L./DiBlasio, P./Giossi, L./Pisano, J./Ricci, C./Sacchi, M./Ugazio, V. (1995): Hinter den Kulissen der Organisation, 6. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini Palazzoli, M./Boscolo, L./Cecchin, G./Prata, G. (2003): Paradoxon und Gegenparadoxon, 11. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990): The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F. B./Clement, U./Stierlin, H. (1999): Die Sprache der Familientherapie, 5. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938): The behavior of organisms, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2000): Cynefin: a sense of time and space. The social ecology of knowledge management, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrer, J./Varga von Kibéd, M. (2003): Ganz im Gegenteil, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spee, A. P./Jarzabkowski, P. (2009): Strategy tools as boundary objects, in: Strategic Organization 7 (2), S. 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M./Sandelands, L. E./Dutton, J. E. (1981): Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (4), S. 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J./Schreyögg, G./Koch, J. (2009): Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box, in: Academy of Management Review 34 (4), S. 68–-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J./Schreyögg, G. (Hrsg.) (2013): Self-reinforcing processes in and among organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (2002): Sticky knowledge: Barriers to knowing in the firm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J./Pisano, G./Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, in: Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), S. 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman, W. (1968): Motivation, Persönlichkeit, Umwelt, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996): The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach, in: Strategic Management Journal 17 (Special Issue), S. 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2005): Do we really understand tacit knowledge?, in: Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader, S. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H./Chia, R. (2002): On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change, in: Organization Science 13 (5), S. 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./Newman, W. H./Romanelli, E. (1986): Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution, in: California Management Review 29 (1), S. 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L./O'Reilly III, C. A. (1997): Winning through innovation, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schlippe, A. von/Schweitzer, J. (2013): Lehrbuch der systemischen Therapie und Beratung, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1975): Widerstand gegen Veränderungen, in: Bennis, W.G./Benne, K.D./Chin, R. (Hrsg.): Änderung des Sozialverhaltens, Stuttgart, S. 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1930): Behaviorism, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1985): Die erfundene Wirklichkeit, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P./Beavin, J. H./Jackson, P. P. (1969): Menschliche Kommunikation: Formen, Störungen, Paradoxien, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1977): Organization design: Organizations as self-designing systems, in: Organization Dynamics 6 (2), S. 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995): Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E./Quinn, R. E. (1999): Organizational change and development, in: Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1), S. 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C. (1999): Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C./Snyder, W. M. (2000): Communities of practice: The organizational frontier, in: Harvard Business Review 78 (1), S. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, U./Menzel, D./Pawlowsky, P. (2004): Inside the black-box: Analysing the generation of core competencies and dynamic capabilities by exploring collective minds. An organisational learning perspective, in: Management Revue, S. 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann, U./Rascher, I. (2002): Lasst sich Wissen durch Datenbanken managen?, in: Zeitschrift Führung und Organisation 71 (6), S. 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (1996): Dimensionen des Wissensmanagements – Zum Zusammenhang von gesellschaftlicher und organisatorischer Wissensbasierung, in: Schreyögg, G./Conrad, P. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 6: Wissensmanagement, Berlin/New York, S. 263–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (2003): Understanding dynamic capabilities, in: Strategic Management Journal 24 (10), S. 991–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science 13 (3), S. 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Georg Schreyögg

  2. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Daniel Geiger

Authors
  1. Georg Schreyögg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Geiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreyögg, G., Geiger, D. (2024). Organisatorischer Wandel und Lernen. In: Organisation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43438-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43439-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation