Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisation und Umwelt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organisation

  • 1627 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel wird mit dem Organisations-Umwelt-Verhältnis das dritte generische Problem der Organisationsgestaltung behandelt. Ganz grundsätzlich müssen sich Organisationen fortwährend in der Auseinandersetzung mit der sie umgebenden Umwelt bewähren. Nachfolgendes Kapitel thematisiert das vielgestaltige und facettenreiche Verhältnis von Organisation und Umwelt in seinen gestalterischen Konsequenzen. Die Ausführungen reichen von Ansätzen, die eine bedingungslose Anpassung der Organisation an die Umwelt postulieren, bis hin zu moderneren Überlegungen, die von einer wechselseitigen Einflussnahme ausgehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abolafia, M. Y./Kilduff, M. (1988): Enacting market crises: The social construction of a speculative bubble, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (2), S. 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. (1996): Management fashion, in: Academy of Management Review 21 (1), S. 254–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. (2001): Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism, in: Organization Science 12 (2), S. 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S./Kwon, S.-W. (2002): Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, in: Academy of Management Review 27 (1), S. 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E. (1979): Organization and environment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965): Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./Felin, T./Foss, N./Zenger, T. (2012): Organizational economics of capability and heterogeneity, in: Organization Science 23 (5), S. 1213–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asan, U./Bozdag, C./Polat, S. (2004): A fuzzy approach to qualitative cross impact analysis, in: Omega 32 (6), S. 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenas, R./Ulrich, D./Jick, T./Kerr, S. (2002): The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure, 3. Aufl., San Francisco.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G. (1985): The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (2), S. 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G./Fombrun, C. J. (1983): Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environments, in: Academy of Management Review 8 (4), S. 576–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsmeier, B./Dilger, A./Lingens, J. (2010): Fluktuation von Vorständen und personelle Verflechtungen in DAX-Unternehmen, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 80 (10), S. 1007–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañuls, V. A./Turoff, M. (2011): Scenario construction via Delphi and cross-impact analysis, in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (9), S. 1579–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, in: Signs 28 (3), S. 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. (1996): Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (3), S. 404–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. P./Hansen, M. T. (1996): The red queen in organizational evolution, in: Strategic Management Journal 17 (1), S. 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, in: Journal of Management 17 (1), S. 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. A./Schoorman, F. D. (1983): A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates, in: Academy of Management Review 8 (2), S. 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N./Walgenbach, P. (2005): Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? The adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry, in: Organization Studies 26 (6), S. 841–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, C. M./Haunschild, P. R. (2002): Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (1), S. 92–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J./Tushman, M. L. (2003): Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, in: Academy of Management Review 28 (2), S. 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J. (1998): Managerherrschaft in Deutschland?, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E./Hughes, T. P./Pinch, T. J. (2012): The Social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgeri, A. (2001): Das Phänomen Lobbyismus, Norderstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M./Child, J. (1999): Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China, in: Organization Science 10 (3), S. 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzem, S./Dobusch, L. (2012): Standardization cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards, in: Organization Studies 33 (5–6), S. 737–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986): The forms of capital, in: Cultural theory: An anthology, S. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L./Bartlett, C. A./Uyterhoeven, H. E. R./Walton, R. E. (1995): Business policy: Managing strategic processes, 8. Aufl., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann-Herz, D. (1972): Entscheidungsprozesse in den Aufsichtsräten der Montanindustrie. Eine empirische Untersuchung über die Eignung des Aufsichtsrates als Instrument der Arbeitnehmermitbestimmung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchko, A. A. (1994): Conceptualization and measurement of environmental uncertainty: An assessment of the Miles and Snow perceived environmental uncertainty scale, in: Academy of Management Journal 37 (2), S. 410–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühner, R. (1993): Strategie und Organisation: Analyse und Planung der Unternehmensdiversifikation mit Fallbeispielen, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1991): Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making an organizational adaptation: Theory and field research, in: Organization Science 2 (3), S. 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T./Stalker, G. M. (1961): The management of innovation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004): Structural holes and good ideas 1, in: American Journal of Sociology 110 (2), S. 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005): Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A. R./John, C. H. S. (2007): Measuring Environmental Complexity A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment, in: Organizational Research Methods 10 (2), S. 296–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1961): The origin and early development of monopolistic competition theory, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (4), S. 515–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977): The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business, Cambridge/Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J./Miller, D. (2015): Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework, in: Strategic Management Journal 36 (5), S. 758–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1972): Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice, in: Sociology 6 (1), S. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1975): Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance, in: Journal of Management Studies 12 (1), S. 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1987): Information technology, organization, and the response to strategic challenges, in: California Management Review 30 (1), S. 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J./Ganter, H. D./Kieser, A. (1987): Technological innovation an organizational conservatism, in: Pennings, J./Buitendam, A. (Hrsg.): New technology as organizational innovation, Cambridge, S. 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988): Social capital in the creation of human capital, in: American Journal of Sociology, S. 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M./March, J. G. (1963): A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L./Sormunen, J./Parks, D. (1988): Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study, in: Strategic Management Journal 9 (2), S. 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L./Weick, K. E. (1984): Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems, in: Academy of Management Review 9 (2), S. 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994): Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, W. H./Malone, M. S. (1993): Das virtuelle Unternehmen. Der Kunde als Co-Produzent (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. P./Eisenhardt, K. M./Bingham, C. B. (2007): Developing theory through simulation methods, in: Academy of Management Review 32 (2), S. 480–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derfus, P. J./Maggitti, P. G./Grimm, C. M./Smith, K. G. (2008): The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance, in: Academy of Management Journal 51 (1), S. 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G./Beard, D. W. (1984): Dimensions of organizational task environments, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1), S. 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2007): Global shift: mapping the changing contours of the world economy, 5. Aufl., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, W. R. (1958): Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 2 (4), S. 409–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P./Powell, W. W. (1983): The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationalities in organizational fields, in: American Sociological Review 48 (2), S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (2001): Reflections on knowledge and knowledge-intensive firms, in: Human Relations 54 (7), S. 955–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. H./Glick, W. H./Huber, G. P. (1993): Fit, equifinality and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories, in: Academy of Management Journal 36 (6), S. 1196–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, H. K./Slocum, J. W. (1975): Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation, in: Academy of Management Journal 18 (3), S. 562–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. (1996): The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?, in: Strategic Management Journal 17 (Special issue), S. 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1980): Managing in turbulent times, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1972): Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3), S. 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R. (2006): Organizational evolution and strategic management, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J./Singh, H. (1998): The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, in: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M. (2004): Kontingenzansatz, in: Schreyögg, G./Werder, A. v. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Unternehmensführung und Organisation, 4. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elenkov, D. S. (1997): Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: The case for institutional influences on scanning behavior, in: Strategic Management Journal 18 (4), S. 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E./Trist, E. L. (1965): The causal texture of organizational environments, in: Human Relations 18 (1), S. 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J. (2000): Regional clusters and multinational enterprises: independence, dependence, or interdependence?, in: International Studies of Management & Organization, S. 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, L./Narayanan, V. K. (1986): Macroenvironmental analysis for strategic management, St. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, R. N./Richman, B. M. (1965): Comparative management and economic progress, Homewood/Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, M./Welpe, I. M. (2010): Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms, in: Research Policy 39 (3), S. 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1986): Structural dynamics within and between organizations, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (3), S. 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984): Strategic management. A stakeholder approach, Boston et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B./Kahn Jr, P. H./Borning, A./Huldtgren, A. (2013): Value sensitive design and information systems, in: Doorn, N./Schuurbiers, D./van de Poel, I./Gorman, M. E. (Hrsg.): Early engagement and new technologies. Opening up the laboratory, S. 55–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J./DeSanctis, G. (1995): Electronic communication and changing organizational forms, in: Organization Science 6 (4), S. 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. (1987): Business alliances and the strategies of the Japanese firms, in: California Management Review 30 (1), S. 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerum, E. (2004): Unternehmensordnung, in: Bea, F. X./Friedl, B./Schweitzer, M. (Hrsg.): Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Bd. 1: Grundfragen, 9. Aufl., Stuttgart, S. 224–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S./Moran, P. (1996): Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory, in: Academy of Management Review 21 (1), S. 13–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984): The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985): Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, in: American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), S. 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998): Alliances and networks, in: Strategic Management Journal 19 (4), S. 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R./Nohria, N./Zaheer, A. (2000): Strategic networks, in: Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), S. 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1977): Choosing constraints and constraining choice, in: Warner, M. (Hrsg.): Organizational choice und constraint, Westmead, S. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H. (1989): Corporate technological behavior, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1972): Organizations: Structure and process, Englewood Cliffs/NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1994): The concept of core competence, in: Hamel, G./Heene, A. (Hrsg.): Competence-based competition, Chichester, S. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M./Champy, J. (1994): Business reengineering (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Frankfurt a. M./New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T./Freeman, J. (1977): The population ecology of organizations, in: American Journal of Sociology 82 (5), S. 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T./Freeman, J. (1989): Organizational ecology, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J./Selten, R. (1988): A general theory of equilibrium selection in games, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J./Zeng, M. (2005): Structural determinants of joint venture performance, in: European Management Review 2 (2), S. 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J./Cannella, A. A. J./Paetzold, R. L. (2000): The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaption of board composition in response to environmental change, in: Journal of Management Studies 37 (2), S. 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D. (2001a): Neue Organisationsformen, in: Zeitschrift Organisation und Führung 70 (6), S. 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D. (2001b): Postmoderne Organisationstheorie und Organisationsgestaltung, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann, E. (1974): Die Abgrenzung des relevanten Marktes im Rahmen des Missbrauchsaufsicht über marktbeherrschende Unternehmen, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1984): The nature and design of post-industrial organizations, in: Management Science 30 (8), S. 928–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C./Tsang, E. W. K. (2005): Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer, in: Academy of Management Review 30 (1), S. 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P./Balogun, J./Seidl, D. (2007): Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective, in: Human Relations 60 (1), S. 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B./Rice, R. E. (1987): Managing organizational innovation: The evolution from word processing to office information systems, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkovich, R. (1974): A core typology of organizational environments, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (3), S. 380–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1997): Rhetoric and myth in management fashion, in: Organization 4 (1), S. 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A./Ebers, M. (2014): Organisationstheorien, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. (2003): Organisation und Differenz. Kritik des organisationstheoretischen Diskurses der Postmoderne, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijenbrink, J./Spender, J.-C./Groen, A. J. (2010): The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques, in: Journal of Management 36 (1), S. 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M./Emmelhainz, M. A./Gardner, J. T. (1996): Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships, in: The international Journal of Logistics Management 7 (2), S. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005): Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R. (1981): The Harvard organization and environment research program, in: Van de Ven, A.H./Joyce, W.F. (Hrsg.): Perspectives on organization design and behavior, New York, S. 311–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R./Lorsch, J. W. (1967): Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M. (1995): A new Phoenix? Modern putting-out in the Modena knitwear industry, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1), S. 34–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatt, P./Schneck, R. E. (1984): Criteria for grouping nursing subunits in hospitals, in: Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), S. 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D./Hitt, M. A./Goldhar, J. D. (1996): Advanced manufacturing technology: Organizational design and strategic flexibility, in: Organization Studies 17 (3), S. 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D./Slocum, J. W./Pitts, R. A. (1999): Designing organizations for competitive advantage: The power of unlearning and learning, in: Organizational Dynamics 27 (3), S. 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992): Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, in: Strategic Management Journal 13 (Special Issue), S. 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C./Baroudi, J. (1994): The role of information technology in organization design, in: Management Information Systems 10 (4), S. 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1964): Lob der Routine, in: Verwaltungsarchiv 55, S. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1970): Funktion und Kausalität, in: ders., Soziologische Aufklärung, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1973): Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982): Funktion der Religion, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984): Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990): Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995): Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation, 4. Aufl., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991): Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, in: Organization Science 2 (1), S. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. P. (1974): An empirical assessment of Perrow’s technology construct, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (3), S. 338–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharzina, K./Wolf, J./Döbler, T. (1993): Werthaltung in den neuen Bundesländern: Strategien für das Personalmanagement, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G./Simon, H. A. (1958): Organizations, New York et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, R. (1993): Betrieb und Umwelt, in: Bitz, M./Dellmann, K./Domsch, M. (Hrsg.): Vahlens Kompendium der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Bd. 1, 3. Aufl., München, S. 47–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G./Gözübüyük, R./Becerra, M. (2015): Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock‐performance relationship, in: Strategic Management Journal 36 (2), S. 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, I./Singh, M./Thompson, F./Nejadmalayeri, A. (2013): Corporate governance and lobbying strategies, in: Journal of Business Research 66 (4), S. 547–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, I./Ebers, M. (2006): Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 51 (2), 262–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1990): The assessment of perceived environmental uncertainty and economic performance, in: Human Relations 43 (12), S. 1203–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. E./Selsky, J. (1984): Hyperturbulence and the emergency of type 5 environments, in: Academy of Management Review 9 (3), S. 460–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B./Aldrich, H. E. (1983): Populations, natural selection, and applied organizational science, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (1), S. 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellewigt, T./Madhok, A./Weibel, A. (2007): Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships—substitutes and complements., in: Managerial and Decision Economics 28 (8), S. 833–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P./Griese, J./Ehrenberg, D. (1998): Virtuelle Unternehmen und Informationsverarbeitung, Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulemann, H. (1996): Werte und Wertewandel, Weinheim/München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E./Snow, C. C./Pfeffer, J. (1974): Organization-environment: Concepts and issues, in: Industrial Relations 13 (3), S. 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. C./Glick, W. H./Wang, Y.-D./Huber, G. P. (1991): Understanding technology-structure relationships: Theory development and meta-analytic theory testing, in: Academy of Management Journal 34 (2), S. 370–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1991): Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment, in: Management Science 37 (1), S. 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D./Friesen, P. (1984): Organization. A quantum view, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J. (1987): Three types of uncertainty about the environment: State, effect and response uncertainty, in: Academy of Management Review 12 (1), S. 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979): The structuring of organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994): Rise and fall of strategic planning, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldoveanu, M. C./Bauer, R. M. (2004): On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration, in: Organization Science 15 (1), S. 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanari, J. R. (1979): Strategic choice: A theoretical analysis, in: Journal of Management Studies 16 (2), S. 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G./Quack, S. (2005): Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: the growth and internationalization of UK and German law firms, in: Organization Studies 26 (12), S. 1765–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möslein, K. (2001): Die virtuelle Organisation: Von der Idee zur Wettbewerbsstrategie, in: Wulf, V./Rittenbruch, M./Rohde, M. (Hrsg.): Auf dem steinigen Weg zur Virtuellen Organisation, Heidelberg, S. 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Stewens, G./Lechner, C. (2011): Strategisches Management: wie strategische Initiativen zum Wandel führen, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J./Goshal, S. (1998): Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, in: Academy of Management Review 23 (2), S. 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, A. R./Reimann, B. C. (1972): A contingency theory of organization reexamined in the context of a developing country, in: Academy of Management Journal 15 (2), S. 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, C. (2006): Zukunft im Management: Orientierungen für das Management von Ungewissheit in strategischen Prozessen, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. (1987): Theoretische Volkswirtschaftslehre, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1990): Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future directions, in: Academy of Management Review 15 (2), S. 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991): Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, in: Academy of Management Review 16 (1), S. 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992): The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations, in: Organization Science 3 (3), S. 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007): Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work, in: Organization Studies 28 (9), S. 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J./Scott, S. V. (2008): Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, in: The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1), S. 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G. (1995): Formen der Produktion. Organisation und Rekursivität, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G./Sydow, J. (2001) (Hrsg.): Strategie und Strukturation. Strategisches Management von Unternehmen, Netzwerken und Konzernen, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, A. E. (1986): Grundzüge der Preistheorie, 3. Aufl., Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, K./Adamek, S. (2008): Der gekaufte Staat: wie Konzernvertreter in deutschen Ministerien sich ihre Gesetze selbst schreiben, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1967): A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations, in: American Sociological Review 32 (2), S. 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1973): Some reflections on technology and organizational analysis, in: Negandhi, A. R. (Hrsg.): Modern organizational theory – contextual, environmental, and socio-cultural variables, Kent, Ohio, S. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1973): Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organizational-environment linkage, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 18 (3), S. 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1974): Cooptation and the composition of electric utility boards of directors, in: Pacific Sociological Review 17 (3), S. 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1997): New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects, New York, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J./Nowak, P. (1976): Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence, in: Administrative Science Quaterly 21 (9), S. 398–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J./Salancik, G. R. (1978): The external control of organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W./Metze, G./Schneider, W./Amler, R. W. (1985): Technologie-Portfolio zum Management strategischer Zukunftsgeschäftsfelder. Innovative Unternehmensführung, Band 7, 3. Aufl., Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A./Dietl, H./Franck, E. (2008): Organisation: Eine ökonomische Perspektive, 5. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A./Reichwald, R./Wigand, R. T. (2008): Information, organization and management, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J./Sabel, C. F. (1985): Das Ende der Massenproduktion. Studie über die Requalifizierung der Arbeit und die Rückkehr der Ökonomie in die Gesellschaft, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poensgen, O. H. (1980): Between market and hierarchy – The role of interlocking directorates, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 136 (2), S. 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeschl, H. (2013): Strategische Unternehmensführung zwischen Shareholder-Value und Stakeholder-Value, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1984): Wettbewerbsstrategie, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1991): Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, in: Strategic Management Journal 12 (Special Issue), S. 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K./Hamel, G. (1990): The core competence of the corporation, in: Harvard Business Review 68 (3), S. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I./Stengers, I. (1984): Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G./Kenis, P. (2008): Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness, in: Journal of public administration research and theory 18 (2), S. 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980): Strategies for change, logical incrementalism, Homewood/Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1992): Intelligent enterprise. A knowledge and service based paradigm for industry, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S./Birkinshaw, J./Probst, G./Tushman, M. L. (2009): Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance, in: Organization Science 20 (4), S. 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reibnitz, U. H. v. (1982): Szenario-Technik als Grundlage von Planungen, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R./Rogers, E. M. (1980): Reinvention in the innovation process, in: Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1 (4), S. 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringlstetter, M. J. (1997): Organisation von Unternehmensverbindungen. Einführung in die Gestaltung der Organisationsstruktur, München/Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, K. (2011): The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation, in: Research Policy 40 (4), S. 588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P./Schendel, D./Teece, R. (1994): Fundamental issues in strategy, in: Rumelt, R. P./Schendel, D./Teece, R. (Hrsg.): Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salimath, M. S./Jones III, R. (2011): Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability, in: Management Decision 49 (6), S. 874–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M./Ross, D. (1990): Industrial market structure and economic performance, 3. Aufl., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A./Steensma, H. K. (2001): The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis, in: Academy of Management Journal 44 (6), S. 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. (1985): Die Unhaltbarkeit des Transaktionskostenansatzes für die „Markt oder Unternehmung“-Diskussion, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (12), S. 1237–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C./de Meyer, A. (1991): Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture, in: Strategic Management Journal 12 (4), S. 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981): Problems with contingency theory, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (3), S. 349–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (1983): Der Aufsichtsrat als Steuerungsinstrument des Vorstands – Die Verwaltung der Aktiengesellschaft im Lichte der neueren Managementlehre, in: Die Aktiengesellschaft 28 (10), S. 278–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (1984): Unternehmensstrategie – Grundlagen einer Theorie strategischer Unternehmensführung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (1995): Umwelt, Technologie und Organisationsstruktur: Eine Analyse des kontingenztheoretischen Ansatzes, 3. Aufl., Bern/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Papenheim-Tockhorn, H. (1995): Personelle Verflechtung als Ressourcenmanagement – Eine Längsschnittstudie zur Kooptationspolitik deutscher Großunternehmen auf Basis der Broken-tie-Methode, in: Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 5, Berlin, S. 107–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Schmidt, L. (2010): Open windows: Shaping information technology as continuous organizational process, in: Managementforschung, Bd. 20, S. 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (2010): Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms, in: Organization Science 21 (6), S. 1251–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1994): Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis, in: Scott, W. R./Meyer, J. W. (Hrsg.): Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D./Whittington, R. (2014): Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies, in: Organization Studies 35 (10), S. 1407–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N./Rivkin, J. W. (2005): Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity, in: Organization Science 16 (2), S. 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. V./Lumsden, C. J. (1990): Theory and research in organizational ecology, in: Annual Review of Sociology 16, S. 161–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T./Hinings, B. (1994): Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test, in: Organization Studies 15 (6), S. 803–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. (1976): Organizations and their environments, in: Dunnette, M. D. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Industrial and Social Psychology, Chicago, S. 1069–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanic-Allmayer, K. (1950): Allgemeine Organisationslehre, Wien/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H./Schreyögg, G. (2005): Management. Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung, 6. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1968): The organization of industry, Homewood, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1990): Information and organizations, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. (1992a): Strategische Netzwerke – Evolution und Organisation, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. (1992b): Strategische Netzwerke und Transaktionskosten, in: Staehle, W. H./Conrad, P. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 2, Berlin/New York, S. 239–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J./Duschek, S. (2011): Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen. Netzwerke–Cluster–Allianzen, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terreberry, S. (1968): The evolution of organizational environments, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (4), S. 590–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. P. (1967): Organizations in action, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986): Networks: Between markets and hierarchies, in: Strategic Management Journal 7 (1), S. 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1995): Industrieökonomik, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todeva, E./Knoke, D. (2005): Strategic alliances and models of collaboration, in: Management Decision 43 (1), S. 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türk, K. (1989): Neuere Entwicklungen in der Organisationsforschung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyre, M. J./Orlikowski, W. J. (1994): Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, in: Organization Science 5 (1), S. 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H./Astley, W. G. (1981) (Hrsg.): Mapping the field to create a dynamic perspective on organization design and behavior, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H./Ganco, M./Hinings, C. R. (2013): Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs, in: The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1), S. 393–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H./Poole, M. S. (1995): Explaining Development and Change in Organizations, in: Academy of Management Review 20 (3), S. 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanovermeire, C./Sörensen, K./van Breedam, A./Vannieuwenhuyse, B./Verstrepen, S. (2014): Horizontal logistics collaboration: decreasing costs through flexibility and an adequate cost allocation strategy, in: International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 17 (4), S. 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, P./Meyer, R. (2007): Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G./Kogut, B./Shan, W. (1997): Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network, in: Organization Science 8 (2), S. 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1969): The social psychology of organizing, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995): Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2000): Making sense of the organization, Maiden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welge, M./Al-Laham, A. (2013): Strategisches Management: Grundlagen-Prozess-Implementierung. Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal 5 (2), S. 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, H. A. (1990): Kontinuität im Wandel, 100 Jahre Mannesmann 1890–1990, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wied-Nebbeling, S. (2004): Preistheorie und Industrieökonomik, 4. Aufl., Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975): Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991): Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (2), S. 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, J./Tan, K.-C./Leong, G. (2015): Principles of supply chain management: a balanced approach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P./Jones, D. T./Roos, D. (1992): Die zweite Revolution in der Automobilindustrie (Übers. a. d. Engl.), Frankfurt a. M. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1958): Management and technology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1965): Industrial organization: Theory and practice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrapp, H. E. (1967): Good managers don’t make policy decisions, in: Harvard Business Review 45 (5), S. 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmnest, W. (2012): Marktmacht und Verdrängungsmissbrauch: eine rechtsvergleichende Neubestimmung des Verhältnisses von Recht und Ökonomik in der Missbrauchsaufsicht über marktbeherrschende Unternehmen, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M./Aiken, M. (1981): Complex organizations. Critical perspectives, Glenview, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, R. (1982): Analyse sozialer Netzwerke. Forschungsbericht, Institut für Soziologie, Universität München, Diss., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2000): Auf dem Weg zu einem ressourcenorientierten Paradigma?, in: Ortmann, G./Sydow, J./Türk, K. (Hrsg.): Theorien der Organisation: Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Georg Schreyögg

  2. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Daniel Geiger

Authors
  1. Georg Schreyögg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Geiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreyögg, G., Geiger, D. (2024). Organisation und Umwelt. In: Organisation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43438-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43439-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation