Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative Erhebungsmethoden

  • Chapter
Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Erhebungsmethoden der psychologischen Forschung lassen sich unterteilen in Verfahren des Beobachtens, Zählens und Messens (► Abschn. 2.2), Verfahren des Selbstberichts (► Abschn. 2.3), psychologische Tests (► Abschn. 2.4) sowie biopsychologische bzw. neurowissenschaftliche Messungen (► Abschn. 2.5). Diese Verfahren sind nicht völlig distinkt voneinander, sondern weisen Überschneidungen auf. Beispielsweise spielen Überlegungen zur Qualität einer Messung bei Selbstberichtsverfahren, Tests oder biopsychologischen Verfahren eine Rolle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Myung, J. & Pitt, M. A. (2002). Mathematical modeling. In J. Wixted & H. Pashler (Eds.), Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 4, Methodology in experimental psychology, pp. 429–460). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1998). The role of mathematical psychology in experimental psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B., & Blanton, H. (2007). Conducting research in psychology: Measuring the weight of smoke (3rd ed.).Belmont: Thomson Wadworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. F., Sechrest, L. & Grove, J. B. (1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R. & Eid, M. (2001). Messen und Testen (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B., & Blanton, H. (2007).Conducting research in psychology: Measuring the weight of smoke (3rd ed.).Belmont: Thomson Wadworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999).Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., Bradburn, M. N., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelang, M. & Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2006). Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (4. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Kelava, A. (2012). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (2. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R. & Eid, M. (2001). Messen und Testen (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer, N. & Schmidt, R. F. (2010). Biologische Psychologie (7. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer, N. & Schmidt, R. F. (2010). Biologische Psychologie (7. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jäncke, L. (2005). Methoden der Bildgebung in der Psychologie und den kognitiven Neurowissenschaften. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandry, R. (2011). Biologische Psychologie: Ein Lehrbuch (3. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P. (2008). Designing effective Web surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N., Lee, R. M. & Blank, G. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Reips, U. & Postmes, T. (Eds.). (2007). The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment.Nature, 393, 470–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.),A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worchester. MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelang, M., & Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2006).Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (4. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amidon, E. J., & Hunter, E. (1967). Verbal interaction in the classroom: The verbal interaction category scheme. In E. J. Amidon, & J. B. Hough (Eds.),Interaction analysis: Theory, research and application (pp. 121–140). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aster, M., Neubauer, A., & Horn, R. (2006).Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (WIE). Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung und Adaptation des WAIS-III von David Wechsler. Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandilla, W. (2002). Web surveys: An appropriate mode of data collection for the social sciences? In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.),Online social sciences (pp. 1–6). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.). (2002).Online social sciences. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,7, 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Psychobiology and social psychology: Past, present, and future.Personality and Social Psychology Review,4, 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer, N., & Schmidt, R. F. (2010).Biologische Psychologie (7. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology.American Psychologist, 61, 27–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993).NEO Fünf Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrea (NEO-FFI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006).Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (4. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2006). Hirnforschung und Psychotherapie.Psychotherapie Forum, 14, 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M., Grabenhorst, F., Starcke, K., Vandekerckhove, M. M. P., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2007). Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Evidence from patients with Urbach- Wiethe disease.Neuropsychologia,45, 1305–1317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brickenkamp, R. (2002).d2– Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test (9. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg. L. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the Internet.European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole.American Psychologist, 57, 819–831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992).Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory. Professional Manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P. (2008).Designing effective Web surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994).Descartes’ error. New York: G. P. Puntam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N. (2000). Selbsthilfe, Beratung und Therapie im Internet. In B. Batinic (Hrsg.),Internet für Psychologen (S. 509–548). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff, G., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2006). »Social Robotics« und Mensch-Maschine Interaktion: Aktuelle Forschung und Relevanz für die Sozialpsychologie.Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C., Carlsmith, J. M., & Henson, A. (1972). The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: A series of field experiments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 302–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000).Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., & Selg, H. (1994).Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI, Revidierte Fassung FPI-R (6. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.). (2008).The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grell, J. (1980).Techniken des Lehrerverhaltens. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, H. (1950).Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress.Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1389–1398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 62–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussy, W., & Jain, A. (2002).Experimentelle Hypothesenprüfung in der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2008).Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäncke, L. (2005).Methoden der Bildgebung in der Psychologie und den kognitiven Neurowissenschaften. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Joinson, K. McKenna, U. Reips, & T. Postmes (Eds.). (2007).The Oxford handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., & Reips, U.-D. (2007). Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys.Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory.Science, 154, 1583–1585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet.American Psychologist, 59, 105–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995).Was ist Kommunikation? (Soziologische Aufklärung. , Bd. 6, S. 113–124). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, M., & Reips, U.-D. (2007). Sleep, sex, and the Web: Surveying the difficult-to-reach clinical population suffering from sexsomnia.Behavior Research Methods, 39, 233–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitsch, H. J. (2004). Warum wir keinen freien Willen haben.Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2003).Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2012).Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (2. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1943).Thematic Apperception Test: Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2002). In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.),Online social sciences (pp. 181–212). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers.Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1979).Kognition und Wirklichkeit. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R., Hess, M., Schulz, S. M., & Alpers, G. W. (2005). Automatic behavioural responses to valence: Evidence that facial action is facilitated by evaluative processing.Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.Judgments and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B., & Blanton, H. (2007).Conducting research in psychology: Measuring the weight of smoke (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1980).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Theory and technique of conducting Web experiments. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.),Online social sciences (pp. 229–250). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reips, U.-D. (2005). Datenautobahn nutzen: Formen der internetgestützten Datenerhebung.Psychoscope, 8, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J., Buchanan, T., Scholey, A. B., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., & Parrott, A. C. (2001). Differential effects of Ecstasy and cannabis on self-reports of memory ability: A Web-based study.Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 16, 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, J. (1939).Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandry, R. (2011).Biologische Psychologie: Ein Lehrbuch (3. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999).Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., & Eid, M. (2001).Messen und Testen (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., & Martin, L. L. (1987). Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In H. J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, & S. Sudman (Eds.),Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 123–148). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., Bradburn, M. N., & Schwarz, N. (1996).Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewes, U. (1991).Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (HAWIE-R), Revision 1991. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. W., Simons, L. S., Berkowitz, L., & Frodi, A. (1977). The stimulating and inhibiting effects of weapons on aggressive behavior.Aggressive Behavior, 3, 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized responses: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answers.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J. (2003).Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. B. (1981).Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weishaupt, D., Köchli, V. D., & Marincek, B. (2006).Wie funktioniert MRI? Eine Einführung in Physik und Funktionsweise der Magnetresonanzbildgebung (5. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Gerald Echterhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Echterhoff, G. (2013). Quantitative Erhebungsmethoden. In: Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34362-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation