Skip to main content

Abstract

The introductory chapter discusses the benefits and challenges of the panel design, among them the possibility to control for unobserved heterogeneity, but also the problems of keeping a panel representative over time. Using typical examples from recent journal articles, it shows that panel data are used not only for the analysis of individual change, but also for the analysis of overall trends. Correspondingly, statistical models for panel data focus either on the change or the level of a dependent variable Y over time. Y can be either continuous or categorical. The chapter concludes with an outline of the following chapters and a summary of the methodological prerequisites a reader should have to benefit from working with this textbook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, it is true that a cross-sectional survey can also ask retrospective questions and in doing so measure what has changed since some former point in time. However, the amount of retrospective information is usually quite limited and always prone to recall bias.

References

  • Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002). Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting. A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (2008). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das, M., Toepoel, V., & van Soest, A. (2011). Nonparametric tests of panel conditioning and attrition bias in panel surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(1), 32–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Gustafsson, B., Hauser, R., Schmauss, G., Messinger, H., Muffels, R., Nolan, B., & Ray, J.-C. (1993). Poverty dynamics in eight countries. Journal of Population Economics, 6(3), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, J. R., Goebel, J., Schechtman, E., Wagner, G. G., & Yitzhaki, S. (2006). Using analysis of Gini (ANOGI) for detecting whether two subsamples represent the same universe. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(4), 427–468.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroh, M. (2012). Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2011), No. 66. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1940). Panel studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The peoples choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Fiske, M. (1938). The panel as a new tool for measuring opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2, 596–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (1995). Die Zuwanderer-Stichprobe des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels (SOEP). Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 64, 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, P., Allum, N., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2009). Attitudes over time: The psychology of panel conditioning. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys (pp. 113–126). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zouwen, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2001). Reactivity in panel studies and its consequences for testing causal hypotheses. Sociological Methods & Research, 30(1), 35–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics. A modern approach. Mason: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This text has a long history and parts of it have served as background literature in lectures, seminars, and workshops both in Cologne and in other places. We thank the participants of these courses for their questions and comments, which helped us to formulate our ideas more precisely and hopefully in a more coherent form. Our special thanks go to our colleagues Josef Brüderl, Kenneth Bollen, Romana Careja, Marco Gießelmann, Achim Goerres, Heiner Meulemann, Henning Lohmann, Luis Maldonado, Ulrich Pötter, Götz Rohwer, and Hawal Shamon who discussed numerous versions of this text with us and contributed valuable improvements. Thorsten Meiser, Ingo Rohlfing, Elmar Schlüter, and Dirk Temme provided helpful literature references from their field of methodological expertise. A special word of thanks goes to all the people that supported our intention to write an applied textbook introducing panel analysis with real research examples from scholarly journals. Helmut Dietl, Bernd Fitzenberger, Geoffrey Garrett, Karsten Hank, Guido Heineck, David Johnson, Markus Klein, Richard Lucas, Pasi Moisio, Stephanie Moller, and John Stephens provided us with their data. Some of them will be used in this textbook, the rest will be provided on the web site for secondary analysis. We especially like to thank Jan Goebel at the Research Data Center of the SOEP and Heather Laurie at the Institute for Social and Economic Research for the permission to use anonymized versions of SOEP and BHPS data in our textbook. Evelyn Funk, Claudia Ubben, and Ravena Penning helped with typesetting the manuscript and producing tables, figures, and the index. Donatas Akmanavičius at VTeX Book Production did the final editing. Finally, Joscha Dick rewrote all our Stata syntax files to publish them on the book’s web site. Martin Spitzenpfeil prepared the data files that are available for secondary analysis on the web site. He also programmed Excel spreadsheets to illustrate examples from Sect. 7.2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andreß, HJ., Golsch, K., Schmidt, A.W. (2013). Introduction. In: Applied Panel Data Analysis for Economic and Social Surveys. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32914-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics