Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wahrnehmung, Aufmerksamkeit und »Situation Awareness« (SA)

  • Chapter
Human Factors

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alberts, B., Bray, D. & Hopkin, K. (2001). Lehrbuch der Molekularen Zellbiologie. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1996). Kognitive Psychologie. Heidelberg u. a.: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artman, H. & Garbis, C. (1998). Situation awareness as distributed cognition. In T. Green, L. Bannon, C. Warren, Buckley (Eds.), Cognition and cooperation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Cognition and Co-operation(pp. 151–165). Limerick, Ireland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Air Safety (1991). Report B/916/3032. A320 Attitude control input and DC-10 Autobrake System anomalies. Australian Government Department of Transport and Regional Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K. & Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3 (1),5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44,211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1937). Psychology and the Royal Air Force, 1–A general survey.Royal Air Force Quarterly, 8, 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Kohler, P. & Badke-Schaub, P. (2007). Shared mental models – Linking team cognition and performance. CoDesign, 3 (1),75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudes, N. & Cellier, J.-M. (1998). Étude du champs d’anticipation dans le controle du traffic aérien.Le travail humain, 61 (1),29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosten, J. M., Robinson, J. D. & Mollon, J. D. (2005). Multidimensional scaling reveals a color dimension unique to ‘colordeficient’ observers. Current Biology, 15, 950–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. R. (1996). The Essence of Winning and Losing.Unpublished lecture notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford u. a.: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. (1971). Decision and stress. London u. a.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A Paradigm. The Journal of Personality, 18,206–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung (2000). Untersuchungsbericht CX001-0/0,1 April 2002. Braunschweig: Bundesoberbehörde im Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, A. (1970). Relevance of physiological and psychological criteria to man-machine systems. Ergonomics, 13, 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, A. (1996). Human factors in engineering design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25,975–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. A. (1993). The neuropsychology of attention. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. W. (1947). Theory of the human operator in control systems: I – The operator as an engineering system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. W. (1948). Theory of the human operator in control systems: II – Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. R., Matthews, G., Stammers, R. B. & Westerman, S. J. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences.Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Spiegel (22.10.2007). Nr. 43, S. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. & Pfeiffer, E. (1992). Strategisches Denken, strategische Fehler, Stress und Intelligenz. Sprache & Kognition, 11 (2),75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1989). Die Logik des Mißlingens.Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1999). Bauplan für eine Seele. Rowohlt: Reinbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPA (27.07.2007). DPA-Meldung 21.05 Uhr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1995a). A taxonomy of situation awareness errors. In R. Fuller, N. Johnston & N. McDonald (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation Operations(pp. 287–292). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1995b) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1),32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (2011). Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R., Bolté, B., Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situation awareness. An approach to user-centered design. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. (1990). Bias in human reasoning: causes and consequences. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyferth, K. & Jungermann, H. (1998). Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in kooperativen Systemen der Flugsicherung und Flugführung – Einfluß von Automatisierung auf die Repräsentation des Flugverkehrs durch Fluglotsen. Zwischenbericht an die DFG.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOCUS Online (2007). Jäger verwechselt Soldat mit Fuchs. http://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/unfall_aid_136768.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1999). Language comprehension: A biological perspective. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2003). Problemlösendes Denken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. von (1985). Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und der Begriff der Objektivität. In H. Gum & H. Meier (Hrsg.), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus(S. 9–39). München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. (2002). Wahrnehmungspsychologie.Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J. & Winner, J. L. (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49 (12),1312–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W. (1986). Arbeitspsychologie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyse, K. von (1856). System der Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: F. Dümmler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. & Buchwald, P. (2004). Die Theorie der Ressourcenerhaltung und das multiaxiale Copingmodell – eine innovative Stresstheorie. In P. Buchwald, C. Schwarzer & S. E. Hobfoll (Hrsg.), Stress gemeinsam bewältigen – Ressourcenmanagement und multi-axiales Coping(S. 11–26). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, U. (1969). Parmenides. Vom Wesen des Seienden. Die Fragmente griechisch und deutsch. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofinger, G. (2005). Menschliche Wahrnehmung. In M. St. Pierre, G. Hofinger & C. Buerschaper, Notfallmanagement. Human Factors in der Akutmedizin(S. 48–55). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibscher, G. (1996). Fragmente zur Ethik. Reclam: Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, London: Holt and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston. Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannot, E., Kelly, C. & Thompson, D. (2003). The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems.Brussels: Eurocontrol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaber, D. A. & Endsley M. R. (1998). Team situation awareness for process control safety and performance. Process Safety Progress, 17 (1),43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnath, H.-O. & Thier, P. (Hrsg.) (2006). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1997). The current status of the naturalistic decision making framework. In R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications(pp. 11–28). Aldershot, GB: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass, U., Yunqiu, F., Guopeng, C., Becker, D. & Lüer, G. (1999). Is memory for shapes subject to language specific effects? An experimental study of memory span in German and Chinese subjects. Sprache und Kognition, 18,136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lions, J.-L. (1996). ARIANE 5 Flight 501 Failure. Report by the Inquiry Board.Online-Dokument, verfügbar unter http://sunnyday.mit.edu/accidents/Ariane5accidentreport.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars Climate Orbiter Investigation Board (1999). Mars Climate Orbiter mishap investigation board phase I Report. Online-Dokument, verfügbar unter ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/reports/1999/MCO_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Material der Bundesanstalt für Flugunfalluntersuchung (2000). Jahresbulletin 2000, Teil 2: Berichte, Aktenzeichen2X003-0/00.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63 (2),81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitschke, T. (1997). Handbuch für technische Einsatzleitungen.Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86,214–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, U. (2001). Platon. Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75,522–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision making (Tech. Rep. No.46).Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J. & Salas, E. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods(pp. 327–346). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1997).Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents.Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, H. (1997). Decision making in complex situations: Cognitive and motivational limitations. In: R. Flin, E. Salas, M. E. Strub & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress. emerging themes and applications(pp. 291–300). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, H. (2006). Störungen und Fehler beim Denken und Problemlösen. In J. Funke (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Band C/II/8 »Denken und Problemlösen«(S. 447–482). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, H. (2007). The importance of the characteristics of the task to understand team mental models. CoDesign, 3 (1),37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, H. (2009a). Der Soldat als Human Factor – Störfaktor moderner Rüstungsprojekte? Gneisenau Blätter: „Soldat und digitales Schlachtfeld" Band 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, H. (2009b). Human Factors in modernen Rüstungsprojekten: Soldaten als Problem oder Problemlöser? Politik & Sicherheit, 9, 10-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. F. & Schaible, H.-G. (Hrsg.) (2006). Neuro- und Sinnesphysiologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1953). Einführung in die Lehre vom Adaptionssyndrom. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spick, M. (1989). The ace factor. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online (2010). Falsche Kameradschaft mit Oberst Klein. http:// http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,712780,00.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieß, R. (2002). Unbewusste Informationsverarbeitung. Forschungsansätze, Ergebnisse und methodische Probleme. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N. A., Stewart, R., Harris, D., Houghton, R. J., Baber, C., McMaster, R., Salmon P., Hoyle, G., Walker, G., Young, M. S., Linsell, M., Dymott, R. & Green, D. (2006). Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: Theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics, 49 (12), 1288–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. (1986). Air disasters. London: Arrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Tzu(1988). The Art of Strategy, translated by R. L. Wing. Seattle, Washington: Main Street Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagesschau.de (2010). Ermittlungen gegen Oberst Klein eingestellt. http:// http://www.tagesschau.de/inland/kundusangriff104.html

  • Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G.(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (2005). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In M. Bazerman (Ed.), Negotiation, decision making and conflict management, Vol 1–3.(pp. 251–258).Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, B. D. (1996). Clausewitzian friction and future war. McNair Paper no. 52. Washington, DC: Institute of National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IABG mbH Defence and Security, Einsteinstr. 20, 85521, Ottobrunn, Deutschland

    Harald Schaub

Authors
  1. Harald Schaub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Product Innovation Management, TU Delft Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Landbergstraat 15, 2628, CE Delft, Niederlande

    Petra Badke-Schaub

  2. Hofinger Forschung Beratung Training, Team HF, Hohenheimer Str. 104, 71686, Remseck

    Gesine Hofinger

  3. Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500, Nijmegen, Niederlande

    Kristina Lauche

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaub, H. (2012). Wahrnehmung, Aufmerksamkeit und »Situation Awareness« (SA). In: Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., Lauche, K. (eds) Human Factors. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19886-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation