Skip to main content
  • 4260 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wiederherstellung der Kontinuität durch Sehnennaht. Die Sehnennaht muss stabil genug sein, um frühzeitige Bewegungsübungen zu erlauben, anderseits darf die Naht die Gleitfähigkeit der Sehne nicht beeinträchtigen und keine Vernarbungen induzieren. Kenntnisse der Anatomie, Biomechanik und Verheilungsprozesse der Beugesehnen sind für die Versorgung enorm wichtig und müssen berücksichtigt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur:

  • Dovelle S, Heeter PK (1989) The Washington Regimen: rehabilitation of the hand following flexor tendon injuries. Phys Ther 69 ( 12 ): 1034–1040

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dogramaci Y et al (2008) Does strand configuration and number of purchase points affect the biomechanical behavior of a tendon repair? A biomechnical evaluation using different Kessler methods of flexor tendon repair. Hand 3: 266–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dovan TT et al (2003) Eight-strand core suture technique for repair of intrasynovial flexor tendon lacerations. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery 7 ( 2 ) 70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot D (2002) Primary flexor tendon repair – operative repair, pulley management and rehabilitation. J hand surg. 27 B, 6: 507–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldmacher J, Köckerling F (1991) Sehnenchirurgie: Urban & Schwarzenberg München, Wien, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts DG et al (1999) Rehabilitation for secondary flexor tendon reconstruction in children. Techniques in hand and Upper Extremity Surgery 3: 286–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage R et al (2005) Differential splintage for flexor tendon rehabilitation. An experimental study of its effect on finger flexion strength. J Hand surg. 30B, 2: 168–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland JW (1999) Flexor tendons – Acute injuries. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC: Green's Operative Hand surgery vol 2: 1851–897 Churchill Livingstone, New York, Edinburgh, London, Philadelphia, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland JW (2005) The scientific basis for advances in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Ther 18: 94–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang JB (2005) Clinical autcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin 21: 199–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kusano MA et al (2005) Supelementary core sutures increase resistance to grapping for flexor digitorum profundus tendon to bone surface repair – An in vitro biomechanical analysis. J Hand Surg 30 B: 288–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier MJ et al (2001) Flexor digitorum profundus tendon to bone repair using a multi-strand suture technique. Techniques in Hand an Upper Extremity Surgery 5: 157–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duran R J, Houser RG (1975) Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones tow and three. In: AAOS Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the hand 182–189. Mosby St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • I wuagwu F, Gupta A (2004) A simple tendon retrieval method. J Hand Surg. 29B: 191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert HE et al (1973) Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop. Clin N Amer 4: 865–876

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert HE et al (1975) Primary repair of zone two flexor tendon lacerations. In: AAOS Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the hand. 91–104. Masby St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora R et al (2008) Primär Behandlung von offenen Strecksehnenverletzungen der Hand. Oper Orthop. Traumatol. 20: 13–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulstrode NW et al (2005) Extensor tendon rehabilitation. A prospective trial comparing three rehabilitation regimes. J Hand Surg 30 B: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport ML, Tucker RL (2005) New perspectives on extensor tendon repair and implications for rehabilitation. J Hand Ther 18: 175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partecke B-D, Peterhof G (1998) Die Versorgung und Nachbehandlung von Strecksehnenverletzungen an der Hand. Unfallchirurg 101: 807–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Windolf J (2006) Strecksehnenverletzungen der Hand. Unfallchirurg 109: 659–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz D et al ( 2005 ) Delayed single Kirschner wire compression technique for malet fracture. J Hand Surg 30 B: 180 – 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister EP et al ( 2003 ) Extension block prinning for large mallet fractures. J Hand Surg 28 A: 453 – 459.

    Google Scholar 

  • King HJ et al ( 2001 ) Complication of operative treatment for mallet fractures of the distal phalanx. J Hand Surg. 26 B : 28–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pegoli L. et al ( 2003 ) The Ishiguro extension block technique for the treatment of mallet finger fracture: Indications and clinical results. J Hand Surg 28 B: 15 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiche A et al (1979) Prevention of boutonnie're deformity. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 46: 164–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JR (1999) Extensor tendons acute injuries. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC ( Eds ) Green's operative hand Surgery 5th ed 1950–1987 Churchill Livingstone New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb K, Pommersberger K-J ( 2008) Erfahrungen mit dem short arc motion ( SAM )-Schema in der Nachbehandlung isolierter Strecksehnenverletzungen der Zone E und F nach WILHELM. Hand Mikrochir. Plast Chir. 40: 165–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khandwala AR et al (2004) Immediate repair and early mobilization of the extensor pollicis longus tendon in Zones 1 to 4 J Hand Surg 29 B: 250–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Slesarenko YA et al (2005) Suture anchor technique for anatomic reconstruction in chronic boutonnie're deformity. Techniques in Hand an Upper Extremity Surgery 9: 172–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow JW (1976) A method for reconstruction of the central slip of the extensor tendon of a finger. Plast Reconstr. Surg 57: 455–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hug LK et al (1990) Early controlled active mobilization with dynamic splintage for treatment of extensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg 15 A: 251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue G., Tamura Y (1996) Dislocation of the extensor tendons over the metacarpophalangeal joints. J Hand Surg 21 A: 464–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaienti L, Merle M (1997) Verletzungen des Extensorenapparates in: Merle M, Dautel G, Rehat St ( ed ): Chirurgie der Hand, Thieme Stuttgart Bd 1: 191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon FT (1954) Recurent dislocation of extensor tensons. J Bone Jt Surg 36 B: 612–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini AK (2008) Orthopädische Handchirurgie –Manual für Klinik und Praxis. 2. Aufl. Steinkopff Verlag

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martini, A.K. (2011). Sehnennaht. In: Traumatologische Handchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00988-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00988-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00988-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics