Advances in science often unify conceptually things previously thought to be unconnected. Thus Newtonian mechanics unified our understanding of stellar and terrestial motions, and Maxwell?’s theory unified our understanding of electromagnetic phenomena and light. Einstein’s special theory of relativity unified our concepts of space and time, and his general theory unified our conceptions of spacetime and gravity. My thesis here is that the integration of consciousness into science requires considering together two outstanding fundamental problems in contemporary science, namely the problem of the connection between mind and brain, and the problem of measurement in quantum theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. James, The Principles of Psychology(Dover, NewYork, 1950; reprint of 1890 text), vol. I, p. 146.
W. James, Psychology: Briefer Course(Henry Holt, New York, 1893), p. 468.
W. Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy(Harper and Row, New York, 1958), chap. III.
G. Edelman, The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness (Basic Books, New York, 1990); Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection(Basic Books, New York, 1987).
A. Fogelson and R. Zucker, Presynaptic Calcium Diffusion from Various Arrays of Single Channels: Implications for Transmitter Release and Synaptic Facilitation, Biophys. J. 48, 1003–1017, (1985).
H. Korn and D. Faber, Regulation and Significance of Probabilistic Release Mechanisms at Central Synapses, in Synaptic Function, edited by G. Edelman, W. E. Gall, and W. M. Cowan (Wiley, New York, 1987).
L. Ingber, Statistical Mechanics of Neocortical Interactions: Dynamics of Synaptic Modification, Phys. Rev. A 8, 385–416, (1983).
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, 1955), chap. VI.
Ref. 1, p. 241.
Ref. 1, p. 178.
Ref. 1, p. 606.
Ref. 1, p. 612.
Ref. 4, pp. 93–94.
Ref. 4, pp. 56, 109–112.
Ref. 4, pp. 93, 57.
Ref. 4, p. 93.
Ref. 4, p. 97.
Ref. 4, p. 155.
Ref. 4, p. 101.
Ref. 4, p. 100.
Ref. 4, p. 10.
Ref. 4, pp. 19, 253.
Ref. 4, pp. 19, 260.
Ref. 4, p. 10.
J. C. Eccles, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 227, 411–428 (1986); A Unitary Hypothesis of Mind–Brain Interaction in the Cerebral Cortex: Dendrons, Psychons (the 5th Dennis Gabor Lecture); The Microsite Hypothesis of the Mind–Brain Problem (unpublished).
B. Williams, Brain Damage, Behavior and the Mind(Wiley, New York, 1976); D. L. Schacter, M. P. McAndrews, and M. Moscovich, Access to Consciousness: Dissociations between Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Neurophysiological Syndromes, in Thought Without Language, edited by L.Weiskrantz (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988); K. Pribram, Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing(John M. MacEachran Lecture Series, I. Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990). Professor Pribram, commenting on my paper, says “There is good evidence that the brain processes responsible for updating are coextensive with those involved in processing conscious awareness of the projected body–world schema. This reflective aspect of ‘self-consciousness’ is called intentionality by philosophers [and] is dependent upon paying attention . . .”. My theory claims, essentially, that allconscious awareness is a generalization of this kind of consciousness. Professor Pribram also suggests that my term “symbol” be replaced by the term “action pattern”, to distinguish it from the AI use of the term “symbol”. He also affirms that there is a wealth of neurophysiological and neuropsychological data to support my picture of brain organization in terms of a top-level process that issues instructions to lower-level processes as described in the text.
B. Libet, Cerebral “Time-on” Theory of Conscious and Unconscious Mental Function (unpublished).
N. Bohr, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge(Wiley, New York, 1959), pp. 20–21.
E. Wigner, in The Scientist Speculates, edited by I. J. Good (Windmill Press, Kingswood, Surrey, England, 1967).
E. Wigner, in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and Measurement Theory, NATO AS1 Series, Series B: Physics, vol. 94.
J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
H. P. Stapp, EPR and Bell’s Theorem: A Critical Review, Found. Phys. 21, 1 (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stapp, H.P. (2009). A Quantum Theory of the Mind–Brain Interface. In: Stapp, H.P. (eds) Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89654-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89654-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89653-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89654-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)