Zusammenfassung
Die anatomische Integrität der Blasenhalsregion und proximalen Urethra ist von wesentlicher Bedeutung für die Harnkontinenz. Einen Blick in den retrosymphysären Raum zeigt ◘ Abb. 11.1. Vom Arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis ziehen muskuläre Fasern (M. pubovesicalis) zur Urethra, darunter liegen die pubourethralen Ligamente.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ankardal M, Ekerydh A, Crafoord K, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME (2004) A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 111: 974–981
Ankardal M, Jarbrink K, Milsom I, Heiwall B, Lausten-Thomsen N, Ellstrom-Engh M. (2007) Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26: 761–766
Ankardal M, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh, ME (2005) A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84: 773–779
Beck RP, McCormick S (1982) Treatment of urinary stress incontinence with anterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 59: 269–274
Berglund AL, Eisemann M, Lalos A, Lalos O (1997) Predictive factors of the outcome of primary surgical treatment of stress incontinence in women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 31: 49–55
Berglund AL, Lalos O (1996) The pre- and postsurgical nursing of women with stress incontinence. J Adv Nurs 23: 502–511
Bergman A, Ballard CA, Koonings PP (1989a) Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160: 1102–1106
Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA (1989b) Primary stress urinary incontinence and pelvic relaxation: prospective randomized comparison of three different operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:97–101
Briel RC, Frick AF, Frick GB, Gassner K, Peters FD, Hirsch HA (1980) Initial clinical and cysto-urethral tonometric results with a new modification of the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz-Operation. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 40: 784–790
Colombo M, Milani R, Vitobello D, Maggioni A (1996) A randomized comparison of Burch colposuspension and abdominal paravaginal defect repair for female stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 78–84
Colombo M, Scalambrino S, Maggion, A, Milani R (1994) Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171: 1573–1579
DeLancey JO (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170: 1713–1720; discussion 1720–1713
Demirci F, Yucel O (2001) Comparison of pubovaginal sling and burch colposuspension procedures in type I/II genuine stress incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265: 190–194
Enhorning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women. Acta Chir Scand Suppl Suppl 276: 1–68
Hirsch HA (1979) New modification of vesicourethral suspension. Arch Gynecol 228: 326–327
Kammerer-Doak DN, Dorin MH, Rogers RG, Cousin MO (1999) A randomized trial of burch retropubic urethropexy and anterior colporrhaphy for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 93: 75–78
Klarskov P, Belving D, Bischoff N, Dorph S, Gerstenberg T, Okholm B, Pedersen PH, Tikjob G, Wormslev M, Hald T (1986) Pelvic floor exercise versus surgery for female urinary stress incontinence. Urol Int 41: 129–132
Lapitan MC, Cody DJ, Grant AM (2005) Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD002912
Liapis A, Pyrgiotis E, Kontoravdis A, Louridas C, Zourlas PA (1996) Genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized comparison of two operative methods. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 64: 69–72
Milani R, Scalambrino S, Quadri G, Algeri M, Marchesin R (1985) Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure and Burch colposuspension in the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 1050–1053
Natale F, Weir JM, Cervigni M (2006) Pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: which aspects remain controversial? Curr Opin Urol 16: 407–412
Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 153: 7–31
Wang AC, Chen MC (2003) Comparison of tension-free vaginal taping versus modified Burch colposuspension on urethral obstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 22: 185–190
Ward K, Hilton P (2002) Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. Bmj 325: 67
Ward KL, Hilton P (2008) Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 115: 226–233
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baumann, K. (2009). Abdominale Kolposuspensionsverfahren. In: Inkontinenz- und Deszensuschirurgie der Frau. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79938-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79938-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35033-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79938-2
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)