Skip to main content

Risiko-Scores in der Herzchirurgie

  • Chapter
Herzchirurgie
  • 9642 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Ganz allgemein ist ein Score eine vereinfachende Zählmethode. Das altenglische Wort „scoru“ stammt aus dem Norwegischen und bedeutete „zwanzig“ [10]. Später bezeichnete man damit Kerben in Holzstäben, die man beim Zählen von Schafen für je 20 Schafe machte. Die vielfältigen englischen Bedeutungen [6] reichen heute von „Partitur“ und „Stimme“ über „Kerbe“ und „Stiege“ bis zu den hier eher diskutierten Interpretationen „Auswertung“ und „Stand eines Wettkampfs“. Im deutschen Sprachraum hat das Wort „Score“ immer noch ein breites Bedeutungsspektrum: Es reicht von der spielerischen Interpretation der „High-Scores“ bei Computerspielen bis zu Letalitätswahrscheinlichkeiten nach kardiochirurgischen Operationen, beispielsweise im Fall des EuroSCORE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abel U (1993) Bewertung diagnostischer Tests. Hippokrates, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Radi OO, Harrell FE Jr, Caldarone CA et al. (2007) Case complexity scores in congenital heart surgery: a comparative study of the Aristotle Basic Complexity score and the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 865–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Awori MN, Ogendo SW (2008) Rachs-1 system in risk stratification for congenital heart disease surgery outcome. East Afr Med J 85: 36–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone EH (2002) Comparing apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123: 8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boethig D, Jenkins KJ, Hecker H, Thies WR, Breymann T (2004) The RACHS-1 risk categories reflect mortality and length of hospital stay in a large German pediatric cardiac surgery population. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26: 12–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST et al. (2007) Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25, 253 patients. Am Coll Cardiol 49: 1860–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Royal Statistical Soc B 34: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein AJ (2006) Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 63: 403–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies with application to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L (1992) Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. JAMA 267: 2344–2348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs JP, Wernovsky G, Elliott MJ (2007) Analysis of outcomes for congenital cardiac disease: can we do better? Cardiol Young 17 (Suppl 2): 145–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, lezzoni LI (2002) Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123: 110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang N, Cole T, Tsang V, Elliott M, de Levai M (2004) Risk stratification in paediatric open-heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26: 3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang N, Tsang VT, Gallivan S et al. (2006) Quality assurance in congenital heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29: 693–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen SH, Pedersen J, Jacobsen J, Johnsen SP, Hansen OK, Hjortdal V (2005) The RACHS-1 risk categories reflect mortality and length of stay in a Danish population of children operated for congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28: 877–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrazabal LA, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K et al. (2007) Improvement in congenital heart surgery in a developing country: the Guatemalan experience. Circulation 23: 1882–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J et al. (2004) The Aristotle Committee, The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25: 911–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Urn SH, Lee JB, Mun J, Cho H (2006) Scoring and staging systems using Cox linear regression modeling and recursive partitioning. Methods of Information in Medicine 45: 37–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mildh L, Pettilä V, Sairanen H, Rautiainen P (2007) Predictive value of paediatric risk of mortality score and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score after paediatric open-heart surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6: 628–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R (1999) European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro-SCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16: 9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Höglund P, Lührs C, Brandt J (2006) Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 27: 867–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nina RV, Gama ME, dos Santos AM et al. (2007) Is the RACHS-1 (risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery) a useful tool in our scenario? Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 22: 425–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsonnet V (1995) Risk stratification in cardiac surgery: is it worthwhile? J Card Surg 10: 690–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaurn P, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of t he propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant P, de Worm E, Meyns B, Wouters P (2001) The challenge of departmental quality control in the reengineering towards off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20: 538–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbusch PJ, Oostenbrink JB, Zuurbier J J, Schaepkens FJ (2007) The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: a comparative study. Health Policy 81: 289–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf JJ, Hecker H, Krüger M, Manns MP, Meier PN (2007) Characterization, outcome, and prognosis in 273 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: A single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 102: 107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tu JV, Jaglal S B, Naylor CD, and the Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario (1995) Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Circulation 91: 677–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welke KF, Shen I, Ungerleider R M (2006) Current assessment of mortality rates in congenital cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 82: 164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Böthig, D., Breymann, T. (2010). Risiko-Scores in der Herzchirurgie. In: Herzchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79713-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79713-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79713-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics