Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostizierbarkeit des Todes — Ärztliche Beurteilung oder Scores?

  • Chapter
Grenzsituationen in der Intensivmedizin

Auszug

Trotz aller Fortschritte der Intensivmedizin garantieren diese im Einzelfall nicht das Überleben. In Grenzsituationen ist zu entscheiden, ob man eine Behandlung maximieren, d. h. alle intensivmedizinischen Therapiemaßnahmen ausschöpfen soll, oder ob man die Therapie besser begrenzt, d. h. eine Steigerung der durchgeführten Behandlungsmaßnahmen vermeidet und keine neuen Therapien ansetzt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Arabi Y, Haddad S, Goraj R, Al-Shimemeri A, Al-Malik S. Assessment of performance of four mortality prediction systems in a Saudi Arabian intensive care unit. Critical Care 2002; 6: 166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson S, Bihari D, Smithies M, Daly K, Mason R, McColl I. Identification of futility in intensive care. Lancet 1994; 344:1203–06

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrera R, Nygard S, Sogoloff H, Groeger J, Wilson R. Accuracy of predictions of survival at admission to the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2001; 16(1): 32–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bewley JS. Treatment withdrawal in Intensive Care: the decision making process. www.avon.nhs.uk/bristolitutrainees/dissertations/Jeremy_bewley_dissertation.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brannen AL, Godfrey LJ and Goetter WE. Prediction of outcome from critical illness — a comparison of clinical judgment with a prediction rule. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1083–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundesärztekammer, Zentrale Ethikkommission. Ethikberatung in der klinischen Medizin. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2006; 103(24): A1703–1707

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceriani R, Mazzoni M, Bortone F, Gandini S, Solinas C, Susini G, Parodi O. Application of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Cardiac Surgical Patients. Chest 2003; 123: 1229–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang RW. Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units. Lancet 1989; 2(8655): 143–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang RW, Lee B, Jacobs S, Lee B. Accuracy of decisions to withdraw therapy in critically ill patients: clinical judgment versus a computer model. Crit Care Med 1989; 17 (11): 1091–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang RW, Bihari DJ. [Outcome prediction for the individual patient in the ICU.] Unfallchirurg. 1994; 97(4): 199–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiavone PA, dos Santos Sens YA, Evaluation of APACHE II system among intensive care patients at a teaching hospital. Sao Paulo Med J 2003; 121(2): 53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chromik AM, Wemhöner T, Sülberg D, Reploh KG, Laubenthal H, Uhl W, Mittelkötter U. Das interdisziplinäre Ethikkonsil auf der operativen Intensivstation. Zentralbl Chir (»im Druck«)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen IL, Lambrinos J, Fein IA. Mechanical ventilation for the elderly patient in intensive care. Incremental changes and benefits. JAMA 1993; 269(8): 1025–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook D, Rocker G, Marshall J, Sjokvist P, Dodek P, Griffith L, Freitag A, Varon J, Bradley C, Levy M, Finfer S, Hamielec C, McMullin J, Weaver B, Walter S, Guyatt G, for the Level of Care Study Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in Anticipation of Death in the Intensive Care Unit. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(12): 1123–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Copeland-Fields L, Griffin T, Jenkins T, Buckley M, Wise LC. Comparison of outcome predictions made by physicians, by nurses, and by using the Mortality Prediction Model. Am J Crit Care 2001; 10(5): 313–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Djaiani G, Ridley S. Outcome of intensive care in the elderly. Anaesthesia 1997; 52(12): 1130–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dosa DM. A Day in the Life of Oscar the Cat. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(4): 328–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eschun GM, Jacobsohn E, Roberts D, Sneidermann B. Ethical and practical considerations of withdrawal of treatment in the Intensive Care Unit. Can J Anesth 1999; 46(5): 497–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Esteban A, Gordo F, Solsona JF, Alia I, Caballero J, Bouza C, Alcala-Zamora J, Cook DJ, Sanchez JM, Abizanda R, Miro G, Fernandez Del Cabo MJ, de Miguel E, Santos JA, Balerdi B. Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27(11): 1744–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Faber-Langendoen K, Lanken PN, for the ACP-ASIM Endof-Life Care Consensus Panel. Dying Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Forgoing Treatment, Maintaining Care. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 886–893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fakhry SM, Kercher KW, Ruthledge R. Survival, quality of life, and charges in critically ill surgical patients requiring prolonged ICU stays. J Trauma 1996; 41(6): 999–1007

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Farber NJ, Simpson P, Salam T, Collier VU, Weiner J, Boyer EG. Physicians Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:560–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F. French LATAREA Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. Lancet 2001; 357(9249): 9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B, Kuteifan K, Badet M, Asfar P, Jaber S, Chagnon JL, Renault A, Robert R, Pochard F, Herve C, Brun-Buisson C, Duvaldestin P for the French RESSENTI Group. Discrepancies between Perceptions by Physicians and Nursing Staff of Intensive Care Unit Endof-Life Decisions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 1310–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial Evaluation of the SOFA Score to Predict Outcome in Critically III Patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1754–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Field MJ, Cassel CK. INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE. Approaching Death — Improving Care at the End of Life. NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D. C. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frick S, Uehlinger DE, Zuercher-Zenklusen RM. Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors — a prospective comparative study. Crit Care Med 2003; 31(2): 456–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gusmão Vicente F, Polito Lomar F, Melot C, Vincent JL. Can the experienced ICU physician predict ICU length of stay and outcome better than less experienced colleagues? Intensive Care Med 2004; 30(4): 655–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heyland DK, Konopad E, Noseworthy TW, Johnston R, Gafni A. Is it »worthwhile« to continue treating patients with a prolonged stay (>14 days) in the ICU? An economic evaluation. Chest 1998; 114: 192–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hope AT, Plenderleith JL. The Riyadh Intensive Care Program mortality prediction algorithm assessed in 617 intensive care patients in Glasgow. Anaesthesia 1995; 50(2): 103–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacobs S, Arnold A, Clyburn PA, Willis BA. The Riyadh Intensive Care Program applied to a mortality analysis of a teaching hospital intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 1992; 47(9): 775–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jahresbericht des Berliner Datenschutzbeauftragten 1997. www.datenschutz-berlin.de/jahresbe/97

    Google Scholar 

  33. Junger A, Engel J, Benson M, Böttger S, Grabow C, Hartmann B, Michel A, Röhrig R, Marquardt K, Hempelmann G. Discriminative power on mortality of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for complete automatic computation in an operative intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002; 30(2): 338–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klinkhammer G. Handeln zumWohle des Patienten. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2007; 104(6): A 324–326

    Google Scholar 

  35. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmermann JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, Goldman L, Phillips RS, Connors AF, Dawson NV, Fulkerson WJ, Califf RM, Desbiens N, Layde P, Oye RK, Bellamy PE, Hakim RB, Wagner DP. The SUPPORT Prognostic Model: Objective Estimates of Survival for Seriously III Hospitalized Adults. Annals of Internal Medicine 1995; 122: 191–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koch K. Wenn der Computer kontrolliert, ob Ärzte Fehler machen. Berliner Zeitung 15.04.1998. www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW. Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. JAMA 1988; 260: 1739–1742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lefering R, Wolfrum B, Wauer H, Neugebauer EA. Limitations of score-based daily outcome predictions in the individual intensive care patient. An example of the RIYADH algorithm. Inflamm Res 2004; 53(Suppl 2): 169–74

    Google Scholar 

  40. Le Gall JR. Scores: Are they useful in clinical practice? Euroanaesthesia 2003 — Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lloyd-Thomas AR, Wright I, Lister TA, Hinds CJ. Prognosis of patients receiving intensive care for liefethreatening medical complications of haematological malignancy. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1025–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Marks RJ, Simons RS, Blizzard RA, Browne DR. Predicting outcome in intensive therapy units — a comparison of APACHE II with subjective assessments. Intensive Care Med 1991; 17(3): 159–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Melltorp G, Nilstun T. Age and life-sustaining treatment. Attitudes of intensive care unit professionals. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996; 40: 904–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miguel N, León MA, Ibánez J, DÍaz RM, Merten A, Gahete F. Sepsis-related organ failure assessment and withholding or withdrawing life support from critically ill patients. Crit Care 1998; 2: 61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Montuclard L, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Misset B, De Jonghe B, Carlet J. Outcome, functional autonomy, and quality of life of elderly patients with a long-term intensive care unit stay. Crit Care Med 2000; 28(10): 3389–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moreno R. Miranda DR, Fidler V, Van Schilfgaarde R. Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database. Critical Care Medicine 1998; 26: 50–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers J, Fuller HD. Use of daily APACHE II scores to predict individual patient survival rate. Critical Care Medicine 1994; 22: 1402–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rotondo R. Score-Systeme für die Intensivmedizin. Überwindung der Subjektivität des Arztes durch objektive Entscheidungen eines Computerprogramms? Intensiv-Fachzeitschrift für Intensivpflege und Anästhesie 1997; 5(5): 210–212

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rowan KM, Kerr JH; Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey MP. Intensive Care Society’s APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland: a prospective multicenter, cohort study comparing two methods for predicting outcome for adult intensive care patients. Critical Care Medicine 1994; 22: 1392–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schapira DV, Studnicki J, Bradham DD, Wolff P, Jarrett A. Intensive care, survival, and expense of treating critically ill cancer patients. JAMA 1993; 269(6): 783–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schneiderman JL, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, Dugan DO, Blustein J, Cranford R, Briggs KB, Komatsu GI, Goodman-Crews P, Cohn F, Young EWD. Effect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life-Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2003; 290(9):1166–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Scholz N, Bäsler K, Saur P, Burchardi H, Felder S. Outcome prediction in critical care: physicians prognoses’ vs. scoring systems. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21(8): 606–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sinuff T, Adhikari NK, Cook DJ, Schünemann HJ, Griffith LE, Rocker G, Walter SD. Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(3): 878–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, Amorim C, Toscano L, Rocco JR. Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Critical Care 2004; 8: R 194–R203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T for the Ethicus Study Group. End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units. JAMA 2003; 290(6): 790–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Thiery G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, De Miranda S, Levy V, Fieux F, Moreau D, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B. Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4406–4413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Zimmerman JE, Watts C. Daily prognostic estimates for critically ill adults in intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter, inception cohort analysis. Critical Care Medicine 1994; 22: 1359–1372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zylka-Menhorn V. »Todescomputer«: Risikobewertung von Intensivpatienten. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 1997; 94(11): A 621

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kreiskliniken Altötting-Burghausen, Krankenhausstr. 1, 84489, Burghausen

    R. T. Grundmann (Prof. Dr.)

Authors
  1. R. T. Grundmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein- u. Abdominalchirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz

    Theodor Junginger

  2. Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz

    Axel Perneczky

  3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz-, Thorax- u. Gefäßchirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz

    Christian-Friedrich Vahl

  4. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinik der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz

    Christian Werner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grundmann, R.T. (2008). Prognostizierbarkeit des Todes — Ärztliche Beurteilung oder Scores?. In: Junginger, T., Perneczky, A., Vahl, CF., Werner, C. (eds) Grenzsituationen in der Intensivmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75820-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75820-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75819-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75820-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation